References
- Paddle-Ledinek JE, Nasa Z, Cleland HJ. Effect of different wound dressings on cell viability and proliferation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;117(suppl 7):110S–20S.
- Argirova M, Hadjiski O, Victorova A. Acticoat versus Allevyn as a split-thickness skin graft donor-site dressing. A prospective comparative study. Ann Plast Surg 2007;59:415–22.
- Malpass KG, Snelling CF, Tron V. Comparison of donor-site healing under Xeroform and Jelonet dressings: unexpected findings. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;112:430–9.
- Kilinc H, Sensoz O, Ozdemir R, Unlu RE, Baran C. Which dressing for split-thickness skin graft donor sites? Ann Plast Surg 2001;46:409–14.
- Melandri D, De Angelis A, Orioli R, Use of a new hemicellulose dressing (Veloderm) for the treatment of split-thickness skin graft donor sites. A within-patient controlled study. Burns 2006;32:964–72.
- Barnea Y, Amir A, Leshem D, Clinical comparative study of aquacel and paraffin gauze dressing for split-skin donor site treatment. Ann Plast Surg 2004;53:132–6.
- White R, Morris C. Mepitel: a non-adherent wound dressing with Safetac technology. Br J Nurs 2009;18:58–64.
- Uhlig C, Rapp M, Hartmann B, Hierlemann H, Planck H, Dittel KK. Suprathel - an innovative, resorbable skin substitute for the treatment of burn victims. Burns 2007;33:221–9.
- Schwarze H, Kuntscher M, Uhlig C, Suprathel, a new skin substitute, in the management of donor sites of split-thickness skin grafts: results of a clinical study. Burns 2007;33:850–4.
- Voineskos SH, Ayeni OA, McKnight L, Thoma A. Systematic review of skin graft donor-site dressings. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;124:298–306.
- Cowin AJ, Brosnan MP, Holmes TM, Ferguson MW. Endogenous inflammatory response to dermal wound healing in the fetal and adult mouse. Dev Dyn 1998;212:385–93.
- Nedelec B, Correa JA, Rachelska G, Armour A, LaSalle L. Quantitative measurement of hypertrophic scar: intrarater reliability, sensitivity, and specificity. J Burn Care Res 2008;29:489-500.