Long-term influence of infant periosteoplasty on facial growth and occlusion in patients with bilateral cleft lip and palate

References

• Nordin K, Johanson B. Freie Knochentransplantation bei Defekten im Alveolarkamm nach Kieferorthopädischer Einstellung der Maxilla bei Lippen-Kiefer-Gaumenspalten. Fortschr Kiefer Gesichtschir 1955;1:168.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenstein S, Jacobson B, Monroe C, A series of cleft lip and palate children five years after undergoing orthopedic and bone grafting procedure. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1972;6:33–50.
   Google Scholar
• Friede H, Johanson B. A follow up study of cleft children treated with primary bone grafting. I. Orthodontic aspects. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1974;8:88–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skoog T. The management of the bilateral cleft of the primary palate (lip and alveolus). Part I: general considerations and soft tissue repair. Plast Reconstr Surg 1965;35:34–44.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hellquist R, Pontén B. The influence of infant periosteoplasty on facial growth and dental occlusion from five to eight years of age in cases of complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1979;16:305–12.
   Google Scholar
• Ristilä V, Sakari A, Gylling U, Rintala A. The use of free periosteum for bone formation in congenital clefts of the maxilla. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1972;6:57–60.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ristilä V, Sakari A, Rintala A. Bone formation with free periosteum. An experimental study. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1972;6:51–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hellquist R, Svärdström K, Pontén B. A longitudinal study of delayed periosteoplasty to the cleft alveolus. Cleft Palate J 1983;20:277–88.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Åbyholm FE, Bergland O, Semb G. Secondary bone grafting of alveolar clefts: surgical/orthodontic treatment enabling a nonprosthodontic rehabilitation in cleft lip and palate patients. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1981;15:127–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andlin-Sobocki A, Eliasson L-A, Paulin G. Periodontal evaluation of teeth in bone grafted regions in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;107:144–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood RJ, Grayson BH, Cutting CB. Gingivoperiosteoplasty and midfacial growth. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1997;34:17–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Millard DR, Latham R, Huifen X, Spiro S. Cleft lip and palate treated by presurgical orthopedics, gingivoperiosteoplasty, and lip adhesion (POPLA) compared with previous lip adhesion method: a preliminary study of serial dental casts. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;103:1630–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee CT, Grayson BH, Cutting CB, Prepubertal midface growth in unilateral cleft lip and palate following alveolar molding and gingivoperiosteoplasty. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2004;41:375–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skoog T. Plastic surgery, new methods and refinements. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International; 1974. pp 34–76.
   Google Scholar
• Huddart AG, Bodenham RS. The evaluation of arch form and occlusion in unilateral cleft palate subjects. Cleft Palate J 1972;9:194–209.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hsieh HY, Ko EW, Chen PK, Huang CS. The effect of gingivoperiosteoplasty on facial growth in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2011;47:439–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henkel KO, Gundlach KK. Alalysis of primary gingivoperiosteoplasty in alveolar cleft repair. Part I: facial growth. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1997;25:266–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkowitz S, Meija M, Bystrik A. A comparison of the effects of the Latham-Millard procedure with those of a conservative treatment approach for dental occlusion and facial aesthetics in unilateral and bilateral complete cleft lip and palate. Part I. Dental occlusion. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;113:1–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semb G. A study of facial growth in patients with bilateral cleft lip and palate treated by the Oslo CLP team. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1991;28:22–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao YF, Huang CS, Tsai YY, Noordhoff MS. Craniofacial morphology in children with complete bilateral cleft lip and palate: does infantile size of the premaxilla predetermine outcome? Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2004;41:410–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao YF, Yang R, Wang R, Huang CS. Two-stage palate repair with delayed hard palate closure is related to favourable maxillary growth in unilateral cleft lip and palate. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;125:1503–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao YF, Huang CS, Noordhoff MS. Comparison of craniofacial morphology in patients with bilateral complete cleft of primary versus secondary palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2002;39:353–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rankielska A, Wojtaszek-Slominska A, Dobke M. Early cleft lip repair in children with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate. A case against primary alveolar repair. Ann Plast Surg 2005;54:595–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojtaszek-Slominska A, Rankielska A, Dobke M, Slominski W. Orthodontic characteristics of maxillary arch deficiency in 5-year-old patients undergoing unilateral cleft lip and palate repair with gingivoplasty. J Craniomaxillifac Surg 2010;38:155–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matic DB, Power SM. Evaluating the success of gingivoperiosteoplasty versus secondary bone grafting in patients with unilateral clefts. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;121:1343–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar