Biomechanical trial of modified flexor tendon sutures: An in vitro study

References

• McCarthy DM, Boardman ND 3rd, Tramaglini DM, Clinical management of partially lacerated digital flexor tendons: a survey of hand surgeons. J Hand Surg 1995;20A:273–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lister GD, Kleinert HE, Kutz JE, Atasoy E. Primary flexor tendon repair followed by immediate controlled mobilization. J Hand Surg 1977;2A:441–51.
   Google Scholar
• McGrouther DA, Ahmed MR. Flexor tendon excursion in “no man's land”. Hand 1981;13:129–41.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Phillips GF, McGrounther DA, Andrews BJ. Finger mobility following flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg 1985;10B:331–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silfverskiöld KL, May E. Flexor tendon repair in zone II with a new suture technique and an early mobilization program combining passive and active flexion. J Hand Surg 1994;19A:53–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bainbridge LC, Robertson C, Gillies D, Elliot D. A comparison of postoperative mobilization of flexor tendon repairs with “passive flexion – active extension” and “controlled active motion” techniques. J Hand Surg 1994;19B:517–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelberman RH, Boyer MI, Brodt MD, The effect of gap formation at the repair site on the strength and excursion of intrasynovial flexor tendons. An experimental study on the early stages of tendon-healing in dogs. J Bone Joint Surg 1999;81A:975–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ejeskär A, Irstam L. Elongation in profundus tendon repair. A clinical and radiological study. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1981;15:61–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuind F, Garcia-Elias M, Cooney WP 3rd, An KN. Flexor tendon forces: in vivo measurements. J Hand Surg 1992;17A:291–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennington DG. The locking loop tendon suture. Plast Reconstr Surg 1979;63:648–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessler I, Nissim F. Primary repair without immobilization of flexor tendon division within the digital sheath. An experimental and clinical study. Acta Orthop Scand 1969;40:587–601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hotokezaka S, Manske PR. Differences between locking loops and grasping loops: effects on 2-strand core suture. J Hand Surg 1997;22A:995–1003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatanaka H, Manske PR. Effect of suture size on locking and grasping flexor tendon repair techniques. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2000;375:267–74.
   Google Scholar
• Cao Y, Tang JB. Biomechanical evaluation of a four-strand modification of the Tang method of tendon repair. J Hand Surg 2005;30B:374–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao Y, Zhu B, Xie RG, Tang JB. Influence of core suture purchase length on strength of four-strand tendon repairs. J Hand Surg 2006;31A:107–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winters SC, Gelberman RH, Woo SL, The effects of multiple-strand suture methods on the strength and excursion of repaired intrasynovial flexor tendons: a biomechanical study in dogs. J Hand Surg 1998;23A:97–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viinikainen A, Göransson H, Huovinen K, Kellomäki M, Rokkanen P. A comparative analysis of the biomechanical behaviour of five flexor tendon core sutures. J Hand Surg 2004;29B:536–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLarney E, Hoffman H, Wolfe SW. Biomechanical analyses of the cruciate four-strand flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg 1999;24A:295–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wada A, Kubota H, Hatanaka H, The mechanical properties of locking and grasping suture loop configurations in four-strand core suture techniques. J Hand Surg 2000;25B:548–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trail IA, Powell ES, Noble J. An evaluation of suture materials used in tendon surgery. J Hand Surg 1989;14B:422–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ketchum LD. Suture methods and suture techniques used in tendon repair. Hand Clin 1985;1:43–53.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Diao E, Hariharan JS, Soejima O, Lotz JC. Effect of peripheral suture depth on strength of tendon repairs. J Hand Surg 1996;21A:234–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotz JC, Hariharan JS, Diao E. Analytic model to predict the strength of tendon repairs. J Orthop Res 1998;16:399–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrie KA, Tomak SL, Cholewicki J, Wolfe SW. The role of multiple strands and locking sutures on gap formation of flexor tendon repairs during cyclical loading. J Hand Surg 2000;25A:714–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silfverskiöld KL, Andersson CH. Two new methods of tendon repair: an in vitro evaluation of tensile strength and gap formation. J Hand Surg 1993;18A:58–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strickland JW. Flexor tendon injuries: I. Foundations of treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 1995;2:44–54.
   Google Scholar
• Aoki M, Pruitt DL, Kubota H, Manske PR. Effect of suture knots on tensile strength of repaired canine flexor tendons. J Hand Surg 1995;20B:72–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Momose T, Amadio PC, Zhao C, The effect of knot location, suture material, and suture size on the gliding resistance of flexor tendons. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;53:806–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pruitt DL, Aoki M, Manske PR. Effect of suture knot location on tensile strength after flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg 1996;21A:969–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmlund DE. Knot properties of surgical suture materials. A model study. Acta Chir Scand 1974;140:355–62.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Savage R. In vitro studies of a new method of flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg 1985;10B:135–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soejima O, Diao E, Lotz JC, Hariharan JS. Comparative mechanical analysis of dorsal versus palmar placement of core suture for flexor tendon repairs. J Hand Surg 1995;20A:801–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar