211
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Scientific Reports

Reliability of plastic cups to measure breast volume

, &
Pages 254-258 | Accepted 27 Nov 2013, Published online: 16 Dec 2013

References

  • Kayar R, Civelek S, Cobanoglu M, et al. Five methods of breast volume measurements: a comparative study of measurements of specimen volume in 30 mastectomy cases. Breast Cancer 2001;5:43–52.
  • Bulstrode N, Bellamy E, Shrotria S. Breast volume assessment: comparing five different techniques. Breast 2001;10:117–23.
  • Kovacs L, Eder M, Hollweck R, et al. Comparison between breast volume measurement using 3D surface imaging and classical techniques. Breast 2007;16:137–45.
  • Wilmore JH, Atwater AE, Maxwell BD, et al. Alterations in breast morphology consequent to a 21-day bust developer program. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1985;17:106–12.
  • Loughry CW, Sheffer DB, Price TE, et al. Breast volume measurement of 598 women using biostereometric analysis. Ann Plast Surg 1989;22:380–5.
  • Galdino GM, Nahabedian M, Chiaramonte M, et al. Clinical applications of three-dimensional photography in breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;110:58–70.
  • Palin WE Jr, von Fraunhofer JA, Smith DJ Jr. Measurement of breast volume: comparison of techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 1986;77:253–5.
  • Campaigne BN, Katch VL, Freedson P, et al. Measurement of breast volume in females: description of a reliable method. Ann Hum Biol 1979;6:363–7.
  • Caruso MK, Guillot TS, Nguyen T, Greenway FL. The cost effectiveness of three different measures of breast volume. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2006;30:16–20.
  • Edsander-Nord A, Wickman M, Jurell G. Measurement of breast volume with thermoplastic casts. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1996;30:129–32.
  • Eriksen C, Lindgren EN, Olivecrona H, et al. Evaluation of volume and shape of breasts: comparison between traditional and three-dimensional techniques. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2011;45:14–22.
  • Kalbhen CL, McGill JJ, Fendley PM, et al. Mammographic determination of breast volume: comparing different methods. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;173:1643–9.
  • Malini S, Smith EO, Goldzieher JW. Measurement of breast volume by ultrasound during normal menstrual cycles and with oral contraceptive use. Obstet Gynecol 1985;66:538–41.
  • Neal AJ, Torr M, Helyer S, Yarnold JR. Correlation of breast dose heterogeneity with breast size using 3D CT planning and dose-volume histograms. Radiother Oncol 1995;34:210–18.
  • Isogai N, Sai K, Kamiishi H, et al. Quantitative analysis of the reconstructed breast using a 3-dimensional laser light scanner. Ann Plast Surg 2006;56:237–42.
  • Yip JM, Mouratova N, Jeffery RM, et al. Accurate assessment of breast volume: a study comparing the volumetric gold standard (direct water displacement measurement of mastectomy specimen) with a 3D laser scanning technique. Ann Plast Surg 2012;68:135–41.
  • Koch MC, Adamietz B, Jud SM, et al. Breast volumetry using a three-dimensional surface assessment technique. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2011;35:847–55.
  • Veitch DE, Burford K, Dench P, et al. Measurement of breast volume using body scan technology (computer aided anthropometry). WORK 2012;41:4038–45.
  • Strombeck JO, Malm M. Priority grouping in a waiting list of patients for reduction mammaplasty. Ann Plast Surg 1986;17:498–502.
  • Grossman AJ, Roudner LA. A simple means for accurate breast volume determination. Plast Reconstr Surg 1980;66:851–2.
  • Ringberg A, Bageman E, Rose C, et al. Of cup and bra size: reply to a prospective study of breast size and premenopausal breast cancer incidence. Int J Cancer 2006;119:2242–3.
  • Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979;86:420–8.
  • Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307–10.
  • Westreich M. Anthropomorphic breast measurement: protocol and results in 50 women with aesthetically perfect breasts and clinical application. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;100:468–79.
  • Grossman AJ, Roudner LA. Discussion of “Measurement of breast volume: Comparison of techniques” by Palin WE, Jr, et al. Plast Reconstr Surg 1986;77:255.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.