A bibliometric analysis of the 50 most cited papers in cleft lip and palate

References

• International Collaborative Research on Craniofacial Anomalies. Available online at www.who.int/genomics/anomalies/en/. accessed January 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Stark RB. The pathogenesis of harelip and cleft palate. Plast Reconstr Surg 1954;13:20–39.
   Google Scholar
• Garfield E. The impact factor and its rightful use. Anaesthesist 1998;47:439–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfield E. Journal impact factor: a brief review. Can Med Assoc J 1999;161:979–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saha S, Saint S, Christakis DA. Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality? J Med Libr Assoc 2003;91:42–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfield E. 100 citation classics from the Journal of the American Medical Association. JAMA 1987;2:52–9.
   Google Scholar
• Seglen PO. Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ 1997;314:(7079)498–502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansson S. Impact factor as a misleading tool in evaluation of medical journals. Lancet 1995;346:906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baltussen A, Kindler CH. Citation classics in anesthetic journals. Anesth Analg 2004;98:443–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paladugu R, Schein M, Gardezi S, Wise L. One hundred citation classics in general surgical journals. World J Surg 2002;26:1099–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubin D, Hafner AW, Arndt KA. Citation classics in clinical dermatologic journals: citation analysis, biomedical journals, and landmark articles, 1945-1990. Arch Dermatol 1993;129:1121–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenton JE, Roy D, Hughes JP, Jones AS. A century of citation classics in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery journals. J Laryngol Otol 2002;116:494–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loonen MP, Hage JJ, Kon M. Plastic surgery classics: characteristics of 50 top-cited articles in four plastic surgery journals since 1946. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;121:320–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loonen MP, Hage JJ, Kon M. Value of citation numbers and impact factors for analysis of plastic surgery research. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;120:2082.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon DY, Yun EJ, Ku YJ, et al. Citation classics in radiology journals: the 100 top-cited articles, 1945-2012. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;201:471–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly JC, Glynn RW, O’ Briain DE, et al. The 100 classic papers of orthopaedic surgery: a bibliometric analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010;92:1338–43.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bosker BH, Verheyen CC. The international rank order of publications in major clinical orthopaedic journals from 2000 to 2004. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006;88:156–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mehlman CT, Wenger DR. The top 25 at 25: citation classics in the Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics. J Pediatr Orthop 2006;26:691–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute for Scientific Information. Science citation index expanded 1946–2006. accessed January 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Shprintzen RJ, Goldberg RB, Lewin ML, et al. A new syndrome involving cleft palate, cardiac anomalies, typical facies, and learning disabilities: velo-cardio-facial syndrome. Cleft Palate J 1978;15:56–62.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bergland O, Semb G, Abyholm FE. Elimination of the residual alveolar cleft by secondary bone grafting and subsequent orthodontic treatment. Cleft Palate J 1986;23:175–205.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vanderas AP. Incidence of cleft lip, cleft palate, and cleft lip and palate among races: a review. Cleft Palate J 1987;24:216–25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abyholm FE, Bergland O, Semb G. Secondary bone grafting of alveolar clefts. A surgical/orthodontic treatment enabling a non-prosthodontic rehabilitation in cleft lip and palate patients. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1981;15:127–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furlow LT. Cleft-palate repair by double opposing z-plasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1986;78:724–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw WC, Dahl E, Asher-McDade C, et al. A six-center international study of treatment outcome in patients with clefts of the lip and palate: Part 5. General discussion and conclusions. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1992;29:413–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mars M, Houston WJ. A preliminary study of facial growth and morphology in unoperated male unilateral cleft lip and palate subjects over 13 years of age. Cleft Palate J 1990;27:7–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Polley JW, Figueroa AA. Rigid external distraction: its application in cleft maxillary deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;102:1360–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trost JE. Articulatory additions to the classical description of the speech of persons with cleft palate. Cleft Palate J 1981;18:193–203.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McComb H. Primary correction of unilateral cleft lip nasal deformity: a 10-year review. Plast Reconstr Surg 1985;75:791–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tennison CW. The repair of the unilateral cleft lip by the stencil method. Plast Reconstr Surg (1946) 1952;9:115–20.
   Google Scholar
• Ortiz-Monasterio F, Serrano A, Barrera G, et al. A study of untreated adult cleft palate patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 1966;38:36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyszynski DF, Beaty TH, Maestri NE. Genetics of nonsyndromic oral clefts revisited. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1996;33:406–17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cohen MM, Sulik KK. Perspectives on holoprosencephaly. 2. Central-nervous-system, craniofacial anatomy, syndrome commentary, diagnostic approach, and experimental studies. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol 1992;12:196–244.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mars M, Plint DA, Houston WJB, et al. The Goslon Yardstick - a new system of assessing dental arch relationships in children with unilateral clefts of the lip and palate. Cleft Palate J 1987;24:314–22.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Semb G. A study of facial growth in patients with unilateral cleft-lip and palate treated by the Oslo CLP Team. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1991;28:1–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen BL, Kreiborg S, Dahl E, Fogh Anderson P. Cleft-lip and palate in Denmark, 1976-1981: epidemiology, variability, and early somatic development. Cleft Palate J 1988;25:258–69.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grayson BH, Santiago PE, Brecht LE, Cutting CB. Presurgical nasoalveolar molding in infants with cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1999;36:486–98.
   Google Scholar
• Calnan J. Submucous cleft palate. Br J Plast Surg 1954;6:264–82.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shprintzen RJ. The implications of the diagnosis of Robin-sequence. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1992;29:205–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cohen SR, Kalinowski J, Larossa D, Randall P. Cleft-palate fistulas - a multivariate statistical-analysis of prevalence, etiology, and surgical-management. Plast Reconstr Surg 1991;87:1041–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enemark H, Sindetpedersen S, Bundgaard M. Long-term results after secondary bone-grafting of alveolar clefts. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1987;45:913–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorf DS, Curtin JW. Early cleft-palate repair and speech outcome. Plast Reconstr Surg 1982;70:74–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molina F, Monasterio FO, Aguilar MD, Barrera J. Maxillary distraction: aesthetic and functional benefits in cleft lip-palate and prognathic patients during mixed dentition. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;101:951–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sindetpedersen S, Enemark H. Reconstruction of alveolar clefts with mandibular or iliac crest bone-grafts - a comparative-study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990;48:554–8.
   Google Scholar
• Millard DR, Latham RA. Improved primary surgical and dental treatment of clefts. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990;86:856–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salyer KE. Primary correction of the unilateral cleft-lip nose - a 15-year experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 1986;77:558–66.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jones MC. Etiology of facial clefts - prospective evaluation of 428 patients. Cleft Palate J 1988;25:16–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wyszynski DF, Duffy DL, Beaty TH. Maternal cigarette smoking and oral clefts: a meta-analysis. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1997;34:206–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Murray JC, DaackHirsch S, Buetow KH, Munger R, Espina L, Paglindwan N, et al. Clinical and epidemiologic studies of cleft lip and palate in the Philippines. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1997;34:7–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan EN. Occult submucous cleft-palate. Cleft Palate J 1975;12:356–68.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hallock GG. Inutero cleft-lip repair in A/J mice. Plast Reconstr Surg 1985;75:785–8.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw WC, Asher-Mcdade C, Brattstrom V, et al. A 6-center international study of treatment outcome in patients with clefts of the lip and palate. Part 1. Principles and study design. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1992;29:393–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajima S, Maruyama M. Reverse-u incision for secondary repair of cleft-lip nose. Plast Reconstr Surg 1977;60:256–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall HD, Posnick JC. Early results of secondary bone-grafts in 106 alveolar clefts. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1983;41:289–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friede H, Johanson B. A follow-up study of cleft children treated with primary bone grafting. 1. Orthodontic Aspects. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1974;8:88–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen MM. Syndromes with cleft-lip and cleft-palate. Cleft Palate J 1978;15:306–28.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lidral AC, Murray JC, Buetow KH, et al. Studies of the candidate genes TGFB2, MSX1, TGFA, and TGFB3 in the etiology of cleft lip and palate in the Philippines. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1997;34:1–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Farkas LG, Hajnis K, Posnick JC. Anthropometric and anthroposcopic findings of the nasal and facial region in cleft patients before and after primary lip and palate repair. Conference: pre-conf symp on the nose, at the 48th annual meeting of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Assoc. Location: Hilton Head, SC. Mar 1991. Sponsor(s): Amer Cleft Palate Craniofacial Assoc Page 4. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1993;30:1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mars M, Asher-McDade C, Brattstrom V, et al. A 6-center international study of treatment outcome in patients with clefts of the lip and palate. 3. Dental arch relationships. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1992;29:405–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cohen SR, Burstein FD, Stewart MB, Rathburn MA. Maxillary-midface distraction in children with cleft lip and palate: a preliminary report. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;99:1421–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orticoch M. Construction of a dynamic muscle sphincter in cleft palates. Plast Reconstr Surg 1968;41:323–7.
   Google Scholar
• El Deeb M, Messer LB, Lehnert MW, et al. Canine eruption into grafted bone in maxillary alveolar cleft defects. Cleft Palate J 1982;19:9–16.
   Google Scholar
• Fara M, Dvorak J. Abnormal anatomy of muscles of palato-pharyngeal closure in cleft palates - anatomical and surgical considerations based on autopsies of 18 unoperated cleft palates. Plast Reconstr Surg 1970;46:488–97.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lemesurier AB. A method of cutting and suturing the lip in the treatment of complete unilateral clefts. Plast Reconstr Surg 1949;4:1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clementi M, Tenconi R, Bianchi F, Stoll C. Evaluation of prenatal diagnosis of cleft lip with or without cleft palate and cleft palate by ultrasound: experience from 20 European registries. Prenat Diagn 2000;20:870–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krogman WM, Mazaheri M, Harding RL, et al. Longitudinal study of craniofacial growth-pattern in children with clefts as compared to normal, birth to 6 years. Cleft Palate J 1975;12:59–84.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mayer M, Hollinger J, Ron E, Wozney J. Maxillary alveolar cleft repair in dogs using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 and a polymer carrier. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996;98:247–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asher-McDade C, Brattstrom V, Dahl E, et al. A 6-center international study of treatment outcome in patients with clefts of the lip and palate. 4. Assessment of nasolabial appearance. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1992;29:409–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jackson O, Stransky CA, Jawad AF, et al. The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia modification of the Furlow double-opposing Z-palatoplasty: 30-year experience and long-term speech outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013;132:613–22.
   Google Scholar
• Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine - levels of evidence table. Available online at http://www.cebm.net/?o=1025. accessed January 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Ruiz I, González Landa G, Pérez González V, et al. Integrated treatment of cleft lip and palate. Organization of a treatment team. Cir Pediatr 1999;12:4–10; Spanish.
   Google Scholar
• Choudhary S, Cadier MA, Shinn DL, et al. Effect of Veau-Wardill-Kilner type of cleft palate repair on long-term midfacial growth. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;111:576–82.
   Google Scholar
• Sommerlad BC. A technique for cleft palate repair. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;112:1542–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell FM. National bias: a comparison of citation practices by health professionals. Bull Med Libr Assoc 1990;78:376–82.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Link AM. US and non-US submissions: an analysis of reviewer bias. JAMA 1998;280:246–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callaham M, Wears RL, Weber E. Journal prestige, publication bias and other characteristics associated with citation of published studies in peer-reviewed journals. JAMA 2002;287:2847–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole S. Citation and the evaluation of individual scientists. Trends Biochem Sci 1989;14:9–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohannon RW, Roberts D. Core journals of rehabilitation: identification through index analysis. Int J Rehabil Res 1991;14:333–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marx W, Schier H, Wanitschek M. Citation analysis using online databases: feasibilities and shortcomings. Scientometrics 2001;52:59–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guimaraes JA, Carlini CR. Most cited papers in Toxicon. Toxicon 2004;44:345–59.
   Google Scholar
• Moghimi M, Fathi M, Marashi A, et al. A scientometric analysis of 20 years of research on breast reconstruction surgery: a guide for research design and journal selection. Arch Plast Surg 2013;40:109–15.
   Google Scholar