References
- Ohlsen L. Closure of nasal septal perforation with a cutaneos flap and a perichondrocutaneous graft. Ann Plastic Surg 1988;32:276–88.
- Pedroza F, Gomes L, Arevalo O. A review of 25-year experience of nasal septal perforation repair. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2007;9:12–8.
- Parlan MS, Ossof RH, Sisson GA. A compendium of intranasal flaps. Laryngoscope 1982;92:774–82.
- Kogan L, Gilbey P, Samet A, Talmon Y. Nasal septal perforation repair using oral mucosal flaps. Isr Med Assoc J 2007;9:373–5.
- Goh AY, Hussain SSM. Different surgical treatments for nasal septal perforation and their outcomes. J Laryngol Otol 2007;121:419–26.
- Eng SP, Nilssen EL, Ranta M, White PS. Surgical management of septal perforation: an alternative to closure of perforation. J Laryngol Otol 2001;115:194–7.
- Nuñez-Fernandez D, Vokurka J, Chrobok V. Bone and temporal fascia graft for the closure of septal perforation. J Laryngol Otol 1998;112:1167–71.
- Kridel RWH, Foda H, Lunde KC. Septal perforation repair with acellular human dermal allograft. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998;123:73–8.
- Presutti L, Alicandri Ciufelle M, Marchioni D, Villari D, et al. Nasal septal perforations: Our surgical technique. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;136:369–72.
- Woolford TJ, Jones NS. Repair of nasal septal perforations using local mucosal flaps and a composite cartilage graft. J Laryngol Otol 2001;115:22–5.
- Kim SW, Rhee CS. Nasal septal perforation repair: predictive factors and systematic review of the literature. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012;20:58–65.
- Hodde J. Extracellular matrix as a bioactive material for soft tissue reconstruction. ANZ J Surg 2006;76:1096–100.
- Sternberg K. Current requirements for polymeric biomaterials in otolaryngology. GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009;8:11 doi: 10.3205/cto000063, urn:nbn:de:0183-cto0000634
- Spiegel JH, Kessler JL. Tympanic membrane perforation repair with acellular porcine submucosa. Otol Neurotol 2005;26:563–6.
- Ansaloni L, Catena F, D’Alessandro L. Prospective randomized, double blind, controlled trial comparing Lichtenstein’s repair of inguinal hernia with polypropylene mesh versus surgisis gold soft tissue graft: Preliminary results. Acta Biomed 2003;74:10–14.
- Puccio F, Solazzo M, Marciano P. Comparison of three different mesh materials in tension-free inguinal hernia repair: prolene versus Vypro versus surgisis. Hernia 2006;10:253–7.
- Konstantinovic ML, Lagae P, Zheng F, et al. Comparison of host response to polypropylene and non-cross-linked porcine small intestine serosal-derived collagen implants in rat model. BJOG 2005;112:1554–60.
- Clarke KM, Lantz GC, Salisbury SK, et al. Intestine submucosa and polypropylene mesh for abdominal wall repair in dogs. J Surg Res 1996;60:107–14.
- Franklin ME, Gonzalez JJ, Michaelson RP, et al. Preliminary experience with new bioactive prosthetic material for repair of hernias in infected fields. Hernia 2002;6:171–4.
- Bellon JM, Contreras LA, Bujan J, et al. Evaluation of the acute scarring response to the implant of different types of biomaterial in the abdominal wall. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2000;11:25–9.
- Bellón JM, Carnicer E, Rodríguez M, et al. Estudio experimental comparativo entre una prótesis compuesta (PL-PU99) y una prótesis biológica (surgisis) en el cierre temporal abdominal. Cir Esp 2005;78:103–8.
- Allman AJ, McPherson TB, Merril LC, et al. The Th2- restricted immune response to xenogenic small intestinal submucosa does not influence systemic protective immunity to viral and bacterial pathogens. Tissue Eng 2002;8:53–62.
- Record RD, Hillegonds D, Simmons C, et al. In vivo degradation of 14C-labeled Small intestinal submucosa (SIS) when used for urinary bladder repair. Biomaterials 2001;22:2653–9.
- Ambro BT, Zimmerman J, Rosenthal M, Pribitkin EA. Nasal septal perforations repair with porcine small intestinal submucosa. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2003;5:228–9.
- Seyhan H, Kopp J, Beier JP, et al. Smooth and textured silicone surfaces of modified gel mammary prostheses cause a different impact on fibroproliferative properties of dermal fibroblasts. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2011;64:60–6.