Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Swedish STarT Back Screening Tool

References

• Hestbaek L, Leboeuf-Yde C, Manniche C. Low back pain: What is the long-term course? A review of studies of general patient populations. Eur Spine J. 2003;12:149–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker A, Held H, Redaelli M, Strauch K, Chenot JF, Leonhardt C, et al. Low back pain in primary care: Costs of care and prediction of future health care utilization. Spine. 2010;35:1714–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henschke N, Maher CG, Refshauge KM, Herbert RD, Cumming RG, Bleasel J, et al. Prognosis in patients with recent onset low back pain in Australian primary care: Inception cohort study. BMJ. 2008;337:a171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menezes Costa Lda C, Maher CG, McAuley JH, Herbert RD, Costa LO. The prognosis of acute and persistent low-back pain: A meta-analysis. CMAJ. 2012;184:E613–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deyo RA, Weinstein JN. Low back pain. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:363–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayden JA, Chou R, Hogg-Johnson S, Bombardier C. Systematic reviews of low back pain prognosis had variable methods and results: Guidance for future prognosis reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62:781–796.e1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayden JA, Dunn KM, van der Windt DA, Shaw WS. What ist the prognosis of back pain? Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2010;24:167–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent PM, Keating JL. Can we predict poor recovery from recent-onset nonspecific low back pain? A systematic review. Man Ther. 2008;13:12–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koes BW, van Tulder M, Lin CW, Macedo LG, McAuley J, Maher C. An updated overview of clinical guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care. Eur Spine J. 2010;19:2075–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melloh M, ElferingA, Egli Presland C, Roeder C, Barz T, Rolli Salathé C, et al. Identification of prognostic factors for chronicity in patients with low back pain: A review of screening instruments. Int Orthop. 2009;33:301–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandborgh M, Lindberg P, Denison E. Pain Belief Screening Instrument: Development and preliminary validation of a screening instrument for disabling persistent pain. J Rehabil Med. 2007;39:461–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hockings RL, McAuley JH, Maher CG. A systematic review of the predictive ability of the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire. Spine. 2008;33:E494–500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linton SJ, Nicholas M, MacDonald S. Development of a short form of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire. Spine. 2011;36:1891–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent P, Kjaer P. The efficacy of targeted interventions for modifiable psychosocial risk factors of persistent nonspecific low back pain – A systematic review. Man Ther. 2012;17:385–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Windt D, Hay E, Jellema P, Main C. Psychosocial interventions for low back pain in primary care: Lessons learned from recent trials. Spine. 2008;33:81–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Main CJ, G. Sowden G, Hill JC, Watson PJ, Hay EM. Integrating physical and psychological approaches to treatment in low back pain: The development and content of the STarT Back trial's “high-risk” intervention (StarT Back; ISRCTN 37113406). Physiotherapy. 2012;98:110–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill JC, Dunn KM, Lewis M, Mullis R, Main CJ, Foster NE, et al. A primary care back pain screening tool: Identifying patient subgroups for initial treatment. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59:632–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill JC, Whitehurst DG, Lewis M, Bryan S, Dunn KM, Foster NE, et al. Comparison of stratified primary care management for low back pain with current best practice (STarT Back): A randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2011;378:1560–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morsø L, Kent P, Albert H, Manniche C. Is the psychosocial profile of people with low back pain seeking care in Danish primary care different from those in secondary care? Man Ther. 2013;18:54–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kongsted A, Johannesen E, Leboeuf-Yde C. Feasibility of the STarT Back Screening Tool in chiropractic clinics: A cross-sectional study of patients with low back pain. Chiropr Man Ther. 2011;19:10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fritz JM, Beneciuk JM, George SZ. Relationship between categorization with the STarT Back Screening Tool and prognosis for people receiving physical therapy for low back pain. Phys Ther. 2011;91:722–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25:3186–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter R, Lubinsky J, Domholdt E. Rehabilitation research: Principles and applications. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2011. pp 245–253.
   Google Scholar
• Keele University. STarT Back Screening Tool Website. http://www.keele.ac.uk/sbst/usingscoringthesbst/. Assessed 23 October 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson E, Lindberg P. Subacute and chronic low back pain. Reliability and validity of a Swedish version of the Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1998;30:139–43.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lundberg MKE, Styf J, Carlsson GC. A psychometric evaluation of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia – From a physiotherapeutic perspective. Physiother Theory Practice. 2004;20:121–33.
   Google Scholar
• van Tulder M, Becker A, Bekkering T, Breen A, del Real MT, Hutchinson A, et al. COST B13 Working Group on Guidelines for the Management of Acute Low Back Pain in Primary Care. Chapter 3. European guidelines for the management of acute nonspecific low back pain in primary care. Eur Spine J. 2006;15 Suppl 2:S169–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beatty PC, Willis GB. Research synthesis: The practice of cognitive interviewing. Public Opinion Quart. 2007;71:287–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linton SJ. Örebromanualen för screening av patienter med muskuloskeletala besvär: tidig identifiering av patienter i riskzonen för kronisk smärta. Örebro: Yrkes- och miljömedicinska kliniken, Regionsjukhuset i Örebro; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• McHorney CA, Tarlov AR. Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: Are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res. 1995;4:293–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988. pp 109–143.
   Google Scholar
• Morsø L, Albert H, Kent P, Manniche C, Hill J. Translation and discriminative validation of the STarT Back Screening Tool into Danish. Eur Spine J. 2011;20:2166–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruyère O, Demoulin M, Brereton C, Humblet F, Flynn D, Hill JC, et al. Translation validation of a new back pain screening questionnaire (the STarT Back Screening Tool) in French. Arch Public Health. 2012;70:12.
   Google Scholar
• Hill JC, Dunn KM, Main CJ, et al. Subgrouping low back pain: A comparison of the STarT Back Tool with the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire. Eur J Pain. 2010;14:83–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruyère O, Demoulin M, Beaudart C, Hill JC, Maquet D, Genevay S, et al. Validity and reliability of the French version of the STarT Back Screening Tool for patients with low back pain. Spine. 2014;39:E123–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:34–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linton SJ, Halldén K. Can we screen for problematic back pain? A screening questionnaire for predicting outcome in acute and subacute back pain. Clin J Pain. 1998;14:209–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar