How is individualization in constraint-induced movement therapy performed? A qualitative observational study

References

• Corbetta D, Sirtori V, Moja L, Gatti R. Constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2010;46: 537–544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langhorne P, Bernhardt J, Kwakkel G. Stroke rehabilitation. Lancet. 2011;377:1693–1702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntyre A, Viana R, Janzen S, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of constraint-induced movement therapy in the hemiparetic upper extremity more than six months post stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2012;19:499–513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub E, Uswatte G, Mark VW, et al. Method for enhancing real-world use of a more affected arm in chronic stroke: transfer package of constraint-induced movement therapy. Stroke. 2013;44:1383–1388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP, et al. Retention of upper limb function in stroke survivors who have received constraint-induced movement therapy: the EXCITE randomised trial. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7:33–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris DM, Taub E, Mark VW. Constraint-induced movement therapy: characterizing the intervention protocol. Eura Medicophys. 2006;42:257–268.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• DeJong SL, Schaefer SY, Lang CE. Need for speed: better movement quality during faster task performance after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012;26:362–373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitago T, Liang J, Huang VS, et al. Improvement after constraint-induced movement therapy: recovery of normal motor control or task-specific compensation? Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013;27:99–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thielman G. Insights into upper limb kinematics and trunk control one year after task-related training in chronic post-stroke individuals. J Hand Ther. 2013;26: 156–60; quiz 161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Veerbeek JM, van Wegen EE, Wolf SL. Constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14:224–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleim JA. Neural plasticity and neurorehabilitation: teaching the new brain old tricks. J Commun Disord. 2011;44:521–528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thielman GT, Dean CM, Gentile AM. Rehabilitation of reaching after stroke: task-related training versus progressive resistive exercise. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004; 85:1613–1618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cirstea MC, Levin MF. Compensatory strategies for reaching in stroke. Brain. 2000;123:940–953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sethi A, Patterson T, McGuirk T, et al. Temporal structure of variability decreases in upper extremity movements post stroke. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2013;28:134–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH. Motor control: translating research into clinical practice. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Levin MF, Kleim JA, Wolf SL. What do motor ‘recovery’ and ‘compensation’ mean in patients following stroke? Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009;23:313–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuke A. Constraint-induced movement therapy: a narrative review. Physiotherapy. 2008;94:105–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viana R, Teasell R. Barriers to the implementation of constraint-induced movement therapy into practice. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2012;19:104–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön DA. The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. Copenhagen: Nota; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Higgs J. Clinical reasoning in the health professions. 3rd ed. Edinburgh: Elsevier/Churchill Livingstone; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Gjelsvik Bassøe BE. The Bobath concept in adult neurology. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Thornquist E. Videnskabsfilosofi og videnskabsteori for sundhedsfagene [Philosophy of science and theory of science for health professions]. Copenhagen: Nota; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Malterud K. Kvalitative metoder i medisinsk forskning: en innføring [Qualitative methods in medical research: an introduction]. 3rd ed. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Polit DF, Beck CT. Essentials of nursing research: appraising evidence for nursing practice. Copenhagen: Nota; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale S. Doing interviews. Copenhagen: Nota; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24: 105–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310: 2191–2194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massie C, Malcolm MP, Greene D, Thaut M. The effects of constraint-induced therapy on kinematic outcomes and compensatory movement patterns: an exploratory study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90:571–579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Øberg GK, Normann B, Gallagher S. Embodied-enactive clinical reasoning in physical therapy. Physiother Theory Pract. 2015;31:244–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molander B. ‘Have I kept inquiry moving?’ On the epistemology of reflection. Phenomenol Pract. 2008;2:4–23.
   Google Scholar
• Kleim JA, Jones TA. Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: implications for rehabilitation after brain damage. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008;51:S225–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodal P. The central nervous system: structure and function. 4th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2010.
   Google Scholar