The Global Body Examination (GBE): A useful instrument for examination of patients with long-lasting musculoskeletal and/or psychological disorders

References

• Bunkan BH, Thornquist E. Psychomotor therapy: an approach to the evaluation and treatment of psychosomatic disorders. In: Hegna T, Sveram M, editors. International perspectives in physical therapy 5: Psychological and psychosomatic problems. London: Churchill Livingstone; 1990. p. 45–74.
   Google Scholar
• Braatøy T. Fundamentals of psychoanalytic technique. New York: Wiley; 1954.
   Google Scholar
• Bülow-Hansen A. Psykomotorisk behandling: Historikk. [Psychomotor physiotherapy treatment: history]. Sjukgymnasten. 1981;12:8–11.
   Google Scholar
• Sundsvold MØ, Vaglum P. Muscular pains and psychopathology: evaluation by the GPM method. In: Michel TH, editor. International perspectives in physical therapy 1: Pain. London: Churchill Livingstone; 1985. p. 18–47.
   Google Scholar
• Sundsvold MØ, Vaglum P, Denstad K. Global fysioterapeutisk muskelundersøkelse. [The Global Physiotherapeutic Muscle Examination]. Oslo: Private publishing company; 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Thornquist E. Varieties of functional assessment in physiotherapy. Scand J Prim Health Care. 1994;12:44–50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bunkan BH. Den Omfattende Kroppsundersøkelsen (DOK) – The Comprehensive Body Examination (CBE). Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Kvåle A. Measurement properties of a Global Physiotherapy Examination in patients with long-lasting musculoskeletal pain [doctoral thesis]. Bergen: University of Bergen; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Friis S, Bunkan BH, Opjordsmoen S, et al. The Comprehensive Body Examination (CBE): from global impressions to specific sub-scales. Adv Physiother. 2002;4:161–168.
   Google Scholar
• Bunkan BH, Moen O, Opjordsmoen S, et al. Interrater reliability of the comprehensive body examination. Physiother Theory Pract. 2002;18:121–129.
   Google Scholar
• Kvåle A, Skouen JS, Ljunggren AE. Discriminative validity of the Global Physiotherapy Examination-52 in patients with long-lasting musculoskeletal pain versus healthy persons. J Musculoskelet Pain. 2003;11:23–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvåle A, Skouen JS, Ljunggren AE. Sensitivity to change and responsiveness of the Global Physiotherapy Examination (GPE-52) in patients with long-lasting musculoskeletal pain. Phys Ther. 2005;85:712–726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvåle A, Sundsvold MØ. Global fysioterapeutisk muskelmetode – en vurdering av intertester reliabilitet [GPE – an evaluation of intertester reliability]. Fysioterapeuten. 1991;58:29–33.
   Google Scholar
• Bunkan BH. Kroppsundersøkelse – nytte, utfordringer, begrensninger. Omsorg. 1999;16:16–19.
   Google Scholar
• Bunkan BH. [Psychomotor physiotherapy – principles and guidelines]. Tidsskr Norsk Laegeforening. 2001;121:2845–2848.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kvåle A. Physical therapy evaluation of chronic pain patients. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Congress of the World Confederation for Physical Therapy. Book I. 1991. p. 93–95.
   Google Scholar
• Kvåle A, Wilhelmsen K, Fiske HA. Physical findings in patients with dizziness undergoing a group exercise programme. Physiother Res Int. 2008;13:162–175.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anderson B, Strand LI, Råheim M. The effect of long-term body awareness training succeeding a multimodal cognitive behavior program for patients with widespread pain. J Musculoskelet Pain. 2007;15:19–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffner-Starrin L, Klässbo M. GFM-52 och symptom hos unga kvinnor med hovudvärk och friska. Fysioterapeuten. 2007;74:17–23.
   Google Scholar
• Meurle-Hallberg K, Armelius B-Å, von Koch L. Body patterns in patients with psychosomatic, musculoskeletal and schizophrenic disorders: psychometric properties and clinical relevance of Resource Oriented Body Examination (ROBE-II). Adv Physiother. 2004;6:130–142.
   Google Scholar
• Bunkan BH. The Comprehensive Body Examination (CBE). A psychometric evaluation. Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Kvåle A, Bunkan BH, Ljunggren AE, et al. Sammenligning av to undersøkelsesmetoder innen psykomotorisk tradisjon: GFM-52 og DOK. [Comparison of two examination methods from psychomotor physiotherapy: GPE-52 and CBE]. Fysioterapeuten. 2010;77:24–32.
   Google Scholar
• Kvåle A, Bunkan BH, Opjordsmoen S, et al. Development of the Posture domain in the Global Body Examination (GBE). Adv Physiother. 2010;12:157–165.
   Google Scholar
• Friis S, Kvåle A, Opjordsmoen S, Bunkan BH. The Global Body Examination (GBE). A useful instrument for evaluation of respiration. Adv Physiother. 2012;14:146–154.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kvåle A, Bunkan BH, Opjordsmoen S, et al. Development of the Movement domain in the Global Body Examination. Physiother Theory Pract. 2011;28:41–49.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kvåle A, Bunkan BH, Opjordsmoen S, et al. Development of the Palpation domain for Muscle and Skin in the Global Body Examination. J Musculoskelet Pain. 2013;21:9–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvåle A, Ellertsen B, Skouen JS. Relationships between physical findings (GPE-78) and psychological profiles (MMPI-2) in patients with long-lasting musculoskeletal pain. Nord J Psychiatry. 2001;55:177–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales. A practical guide to their development and use. 4th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Costello AB, Osborne JW. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation. 2005;10:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Streiner DL. Starting at the beginning: an introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency. J Pers Assess. 2003;80:99–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Streiner DL, Cairney J. What’s under the ROC? An introduction to receiver operating characteristics curves. Can J Psychiatry. 2007;52:121–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turk DC, Rudy TE. Neglected factors in chronic pain treatment outcome studies – referral patterns, failure to enter treatment, and attrition. Pain. 1990;43:7–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvåle A, Ljunggren AE, Strand LI, et al. Rehabilitation: assessing the outcome. In: Dostrovsky JO, Carr DB, Koltzenburg M, editors. Proceedings of the 10th World Congress on Pain. Vol. 17. Seattle, WA: IASP Press; 2003. p. 893–907.
   Google Scholar
• Stratford PW, Spadoni G, Kennedy D, et al. Seven points to consider when investigating a measure’s ability to detect change. Physiother Can. 2002;54:16–24.
   Google Scholar