200
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Impact of pelvic biometric measurements, visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue areas on trifecta outcome and surgical margin status after open radical retropubic prostatectomy

, , , , &
Pages 108-114 | Received 04 May 2014, Accepted 28 Aug 2014, Published online: 16 Oct 2014

References

  • Russell JG, Richards B. A review of pelvimetry data. Br J Radiol 1971;44:780–4.
  • Sporri S, Hanggi W, Braghetti A, Vock P, Schneider H. Pelvimetry by magnetic resonance imaging as a diagnostic tool to evaluate dystocia. Obstet Gynecol 1997;89:902–8.
  • Boyle KM, Petty D, Chalmers AG, Quirke P, Cairns A, Finan PJ, et al. MRI assessment of the bony pelvis may help predict resectability of rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2005;7:232–40.
  • Chang SS, Duong DT, Wells N, Cole EE, Smith JAJr, Cookson MS. Predicting blood loss and transfusion requirements during radical prostatectomy: the significant negative impact of increasing body mass index. J Urol 2004;171:1861–5.
  • Freedland SJ, Grubb KA, Yiu SK, Nielsen ME, Mangold LA, Isaacs WB, et al. Obesity and capsular incision at the time of open retropubic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2005;174:1798–801.
  • Rosen RC, Riley A, Wagner G, Osterloh IH, Kirkpatrick J, Mishra A. The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology 1997;49:822–30.
  • Avery K, Donovan J, Peters TJ, Shaw C, Gotoh M, Abrams P. ICIQ: a brief and robust measure for evaluating the symptoms and impact of urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 2004;23:322–30.
  • Bianco FJJr, Scardino PT, Eastham JA. Radical prostatectomy: longterm cancer control and recovery of sexual and urinary function (“trifecta”). Urology 2005;66:83–94.
  • Hong SK, Chang IH, Han BK, Yu JH, Han JH, Jeong SJ, et al. Impact of variations in bony pelvic dimensions on performing radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 2007;69:907–11.
  • von Bodman C, Matsushita K, Matikainen MP, Eastham JA, Scardino PT, Akin O, et al. Do pelvic dimensions and prostate location contribute to the risk of experiencing complications after radical prostatectomy? BJU Int 2011;108:1566–71.
  • Hong SK, Lee ST, Kim SS, Min KE, Hwang IS, Kim M, et al. Effect of bony pelvic dimensions measured by preoperative magnetic resonance imaging on performing robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. BJU Int 2009;104:664–8.
  • von Bodman C, Matikainen MP, Favaretto RL, Matsushita K, Mulhall JP, Eastham JA, et al. Pelvimetric dimensions do not impact upon nerve sparing or erectile function recovery in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Sex Med 2011;8:567–74.
  • von Bodman C, Matsushita K, Savage C, Matikainen MP, Eastham JA, Scardino PT, et al. Recovery of urinary function after radical prostatectomy: predictors of urinary function on preoperative prostate magnetic resonance imaging. J Urol 2012;187:945–50.
  • Hsu EI, Hong EK, Lepor H. Influence of body weight and prostate volume on intraoperative, perioperative, and postoperative outcomes after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 2003;61:601–6.
  • Singh A, Fagin R, Shah G, Shekarriz B. Impact of prostate size and body mass index on perioperative morbidity after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2005;173:552–4.
  • Miyazato M, Kaiho Y, Mitsuzuka K, Yamada S, Namiki S, Saito H, et al. Impact of prostate size on urinary quality of life scores after open radical prostatectomy: a single-center experience. Scand J Urol 2014;48:146–52.
  • D’Amico AV, Moul J, Carroll PR, Sun L, Lubeck D, Chen MH. Cancer specific mortality after surgery or radiation for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer managed during the prostate-specific antigen era. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:2163–72.
  • Ou YC, Yang CK, Wang J, Hung SW, Cheng CL, Tewari AK, et al. The trifecta outcome in 300 consecutive cases of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy according to D’Amico risk criteria. Eur J Surg Oncol 2013;39:107–13.
  • Yee DS, Narula N, Amin MB, Skarecky DW, Ahlering TE. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: current evaluation of surgical margins in clinically low-, intermediate-, and high-risk prostate cancer. J Endourol 2009;23:1461–5.
  • Matikainen MP, von Bodman CJ, Secin FP, Yunis LH, Vora K, Guillonneau B, et al. The depth of the prostatic apex is an independent predictor of positive apical margins at radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2010;106:622–6.
  • Chang CM, Moon D, Gianduzzo TR, Eden CG. The impact of prostate size in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2005;48:285–90.
  • D’Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, Schultz D, Tomaszewski JE, Wein A. A prostate gland volume of more than 75 cm³ predicts for a favorable outcome after radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer. Urology 1998;52:631–6.
  • Freedland SJ, Grubb KA, Yiu SK, Humphreys EB, Nielsen ME, Mangold LA, et al. Obesity and risk of biochemical progression following radical prostatectomy at a tertiary care referral center. J Urol 2005;174:919–22.
  • SEARCH Database Study Group. Jayachandran J, Aronson WJ, Terris MK, Presti JCJr, Amling CL, et al. Obesity and positive surgical margins by anatomic location after radical prostatectomy: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital database. BJU Int 2008;102:964–8.
  • Freedland SJ, Banez LL, Sun LL, Fitzsimons NJ, Moul JW. Obese men have higher-grade and larger tumors: an analysis of the Duke Prostate Center database. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2009;12:259–63.
  • Jayachandran JJr, Banez LL, Aronson WJ, Terris MK, Presti JCAmling CL, et al. Obesity as a predictor of adverse outcome across black and white race: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) database. Cancer 2009;115:5263–71.
  • Siddiqui SA, Inman BA, Sengupta S, Slezak JM, Bergstralh EJ, Leibovich BC, et al. Obesity and survival after radical prostatectomy: a 10-year prospective cohort study. Cancer 2006;107:521–9.
  • Gacci M, Sebastianelli A, Salvi M, De Nunzio C, Schiavina R, Simonato A, et al. Role of abdominal obesity for functional outcomes and complications in men treated with radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: results of the Multicenter Italian Report on Radical Prostatectomy (MIRROR) study. Scand J Urol 2014;48:138–45.
  • Mucksavage P, Mitchell C, Kutikov Wein AJ, Torigian D, Malkowicz SB. Anthropometric differences in obese men with biochemical failure after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urol Oncol 2012;30:590–5.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.