References
- Geraghty RM, Aboumarzouk OM, Rai B, Somani BK. Evidence for ureterorenoscopy and laser fragmentation (URSL) for large renal stones in the modern era. Curr Urol Rep 2015;16:54:1–6. doi: 10.1007/s11934-015-0529-3.
- Giusti G, Proietti S, Peschechera R, Taverna G, Sortino G, Cindolo L, et al. Sky is no limit for ureteroscopy: extending the indications and special circumstances. World J Urol 2015;33:257–73.
- Breda A, Ogunyemi O, Leppert JT, Lam JS, Schulam PG. Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for single intrarenal stones 2 cm or greater – is this the new frontier? J Urol 2008;179:981–4.
- Takazawa R, Kitayama S, Tsujii T. Appropriate kidney stone size for ureteroscopic lithotripsy: when to switch to a percutaneous approach. World J Nephrol 2015;4:111–17.
- Akman T, Binbay M, Ozgor F, Ugurlu M, Tekinarslan E, Kezer C, et al. Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde flexible nephrolithotripsy for the management of 2–4 cm stones: a matched-pair analysis. BJU Int 2011;109:1384–9.
- Hyams ES, Shah O. Percutaneous nephrostolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopy/holmium laser lithotripsy: cost and outcome analysis. J Urol 2009;182:1012–17.
- Traxer O, Thomas A. Prospective evaluation and classification of ureteral wall injuries resulting from insertion of a ureteral access sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery. J Urol 2012;189:580–4.
- Lallas CD, Auge BK, Raj GV, Santa-Cruz R, Madden JF, Preminger GM. Laser Doppler flowmetric determination of ureteral blood flow after ureteral access sheath placement. J Endourol 2002;16:583–90.
- Kourambas J, Byrne RR, Preminger GM. Does a ureteral access sheath facilitate ureteroscopy? J Urol 2001;165:789–93.
- Hyams ES, Munver R, Bird VG, Uberoi J, Shah O. Flexible ureterorenoscopy and holmium laser lithotripsy for the management of renal stone burdens that measure 2 to 3 cm: a multi-institutional experience. J Endourol 2010;24:1583–8.
- Burr J, Ishii H, Simmonds N, Somani BK Is flexible ureterorenoscopy and laser lithotripsy the new gold standard for lower pole renal stones when compared to shock wave lithotripsy: comparative outcomes from a University hospital over a similar time period. Cent Eur J Urol 2015;68:183–6.
- Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240:205–13.
- Traxer O, Wendt-Nordahl G, Sodha H, Rassweiler J, Meretyk S, Tefekli A, et al. Differences in renal stone treatment outcomes for patients treated either with or without the support of a ureteral access sheath: the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Ureteroscopy Global Study. World J Urol 2015;33:2137–44.
- Skolarikos A, Gross AJ, Krebs A, Unal D, Bercowsky E, Eltahawy E, et al. Outcomes of flexible ureterorenoscopy for solitary renal stones in the CROES URS global study. J Urol 2015;194:137–43.
- Miernik A, Wilhelm K, Ardelt PU, Adams F, Kuehhou FE, Schoenthaler M. Standardized flexible ureteroscopic technique to improve stone free rates. Urol 2012;80:1198–202.
- L’Esperance JO, Ekeruo WO, Scales CD Jr, Marguet CG, Springhart WP, Maloney ME, et al. Effect of ureteral access sheath on stone-free rates in patients undergoing ureteroscopic management of renal calculi. Urol 2005;66:252–5.
- Stern JM, Yiee J, Park S. Safety and efficacy of ureteral access sheaths. J Endourol 2007;21:119–23.
- Ng Yeung, Somani B K, Dennison A, Kata S G, Nabi G, Brown S. Irrigant flow and intrarenal pressure during flexible ureteroscopy: the effect of different access sheaths, working channel instruments and hydrostatic pressure. J Endourol 2010;24:1915–20.
- Somani BK, Aboumarzouk O, Srivastava A, Traxer O. Tips and tricks of flexible ureterorenoscopy: tips and tricks. Urol Ann 2013;5:1–6.