Accurate prediction tools in prostate cancer require consistent assessment of included variables

References

• Official Statistics of Sweden Statistics – Health and medical care cancer incidence in Sweden 2013. Available from http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/publikationer2014/2014-12-10.
   Google Scholar
• Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Ruutu M, Garmo H, Stark JR, Busch C, et al. Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2011;364:1708–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novara G, Ficarra V, Mocellin S, Ahlering TE, Carroll PR, Graefen M, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting oncologic outcome after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2012;62:382–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh PC, Lepor H, Eggleston JC. Radical prostatectomy with preservation of sexual function: anatomical and pathological considerations. Prostate 1983;4:473–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zorn KC, Gallina A, Hutterer GC, Walz J, Shalhav AL, Zagaja GP, et al. External validation of a nomogram for prediction of side-specific extracapsular extension at robotic radical prostatectomy. J Endourol 2007;21:1345–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhojani N, Ahyai S, Graefen M, Capitanio U, Suardi N, Shariat SF, et al. Partin tables cannot accurately predict the pathological stage at radical prostatectomy. Eur J Surg Oncol 2009;35:123–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohori M, Kattan MW, Koh H, Maru N, Slawin KM, Shariat S, et al. Predicting the presence and side of extracapsular extension: a nomogram for staging prostate cancer. J Urol 2004;171:1844–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steineck G, Bjartell A, Hugosson J, Axen E, Carlsson S, Stranne J, et al. Degree of Preservation of the Neurovascular Bundles During Radical Prostatectomy and Urinary Continence 1 Year after Surgery. Eur Urol 2015;67:559–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves F, Preece P, Kapoor J, Everaerts W, Murphy DG, Corcoran NM, et al. Preservation of the neurovascular bundles is associated with improved time to continence after radical prostatectomy but not long-term continence rates: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 2015;68:692–704.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegde JV, Chen MH, Mulkern RV, Fennessy FM, D'Amico AV, Tempany CM. Preoperative 3-Tesla multiparametric endorectal magnetic resonance imaging findings and the odds of upgrading and upstaging at radical prostatectomy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2013;85:e101–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Mullerad M, Chen HN, Eberhardt SC, Kattan MW, Scardino PT, et al. Prostate cancer: incremental value of endorectal MR imaging findings for prediction of extracapsular extension. Radiology 2004;232:133–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shariat SF, Karakiewicz PI, Roehrborn CG, Kattan MW. An updated catalog of prostate cancer predictive tools. Cancer 2008;113:3075–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eifler JB, Feng Z, Lin BM, Partin MT, Humphreys EB, Han M, et al. An updated prostate cancer staging nomogram (Partin tables) based on cases from 2006 to 2011. BJU Int 2013;111:22–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Hricak H, Kattan MW, Chen HN, Scardino PT, Kuroiwa K. Prediction of organ-confined prostate cancer: incremental value of MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging to staging nomograms. Radiology 2006;238:597–603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turo R, Forster JA, West RM, Prescott S, Paul AB, Cross WR. Do prostate cancer nomograms give accurate information when applied to European patients? Scand J Urol 2015;49:16–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center MM, Jemal A, Lortet-Tieulent J, Ward E, Ferlay J, Brawley O, et al. International variation in prostate cancer incidence and mortality rates. Eur Urol 2012;61:1079–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorsteinsdottir T, Stranne J, Carlsson S, Anderberg B, Bjorholt I, Damber JE, et al. LAPPRO: a prospective multicentre comparative study of robot-assisted laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2011;45:102–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haglind E, Carlsson S, Stranne J, Wallerstedt A, Wilderang U, Thorsteinsdottir T, et al. Urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction after robotic versus open radical prostatectomy: a prospective, controlled, nonrandomised trial. Eur Urol 2015;68:216–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steyerberg EW, Harrell FE Jr. Prediction models need appropriate internal, internal-external, and external validation. J Clin Epidemiol 2016;69:245–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung JS, Choi HY, Song HR, Byun SS, Seo S, Song C, et al. Preoperative nomograms for predicting extracapsular extension in Korean men with localized prostate cancer: a multi-institutional clinicopathologic study. J Korean Med Sci 2010;25:1443–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson J, Wilderang U, Jiborn T, Wiklund PN, Damber JE, Hugosson J, et al. Interobserver variability in the pathological assessment of radical prostatectomy specimens: findings of the Laparoscopic Prostatectomy Robot Open (LAPPRO) study. Scand J Urol 2014;48:160–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjurlin MA, Wysock JS, Taneja SS. Optimization of prostate biopsy: review of technique and complications. Urol Clin North Am 2014;41:299–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhojani N, Salomon L, Capitanio U, Suardi N, Shariat SF, Jeldres C, et al. External validation of the updated Partin tables in a cohort of French and Italian men. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009;73:347–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fanning DM, Fan Y, Fitzpatrick JM, Watson RW. External validation of the 2007 and 2001 Partin tables in Irish prostate cancer patients. Urol Int 2010;84:174–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regnier-Coudert O, McCall J, Lothian R, Lam T, McClinton S, N'Dow J. Machine learning for improved pathological staging of prostate cancer: a performance comparison on a range of classifiers. Artif Intell Med 2012;55:25–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Operations in in-patient care 2008 [database on the Internet]. Retrieved September 20, 2010 [Internet]. 2008 . Available from: http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/statistik/statistikdatabas/operationerislutenvard.
   Google Scholar
• Bjurlin MA, Meng X, Le Nobin J, Wysock JS, Lepor H, Rosenkrantz AB, et al. Optimization of prostate biopsy: the role of magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy in detection, localization and risk assessment. J Urol 2014;192:648–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar