References
- Boso DP, Lee S, Ferrari M, Schrefler BA, Decuzzi P. 2011. Optimizing particle size for targeting diseased microvasculature: from experiments to artificial neural networks. Int J Nanomedicine. 6:1517–1526.
- Boyle P, Levin B. 2008. World Cancer Report. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer.
- Brown H, Prescott R. 2006. Applied Mixed Models in Medicine, Second Edition, Newyork: Wiley.
- Cenk N, Budak G, Dayanik S, Sabuncuoglu I. 2014. Artificial neural network modeling and simulation of in-vitro nanoparticle cell interactions. J Comput Theor Nanos. 1:272–282.
- Chithrani BD, Ghazaniand AA, Chan WCW. 2006. Determining the size and shape dependence of gold nanoparticle uptake into mammalian cells. Nano Lett. 6:662–668.
- Davda J, Labhasetwar V. 2001. Characterization of nanoparticle uptake by endothelial cells. Int J Pharm. 233:51–59.
- Lin J, Zhang H, Chen Z, Zheng Y. 2010. Penetration of lipid membranes by gold nanoparticles: Insights into cellular uptake, cytotoxicity, and their relationship. ACS Nano. 4:5421–5429.
- Peetla C, Labhasetwar V. 2008. Biophysical characterization of nanoparticle-endothelial model cell membrane interactions. Mol Pharm. 5:418–429.
- Robinson GK. 1991. [That BLUP is a Good Thing: The Estimation of Random Effects]: Rejoinder. Statist Sci. 6:15–32.
- Ruppert D, Wand MP, Carroll RJ. 2003. Semiparametric Regression. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
- Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jema A. 2013. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 63:11–30.
- Speed T. 1991. [That BLUP is a Good Thing: The Estimation of Random Effects]: Comment. Statist Sci. 6:42–44.
- Wand M. 2002. Smoothing and mixed models. Comput Stat.18: 223–250.