Chinese speech audiometry material: Past, present, future

References

• Konkle D, Rintelmann W. Introduction to speech audiometry. In: Konkle D, Rintelmann W, editors. Principles of Speech Audiometry. Baltimore: University Park Press; 1983. p. 1−10.
   Google Scholar
• McArdle R, Hnath-Chisolm T. Speech Audiometry. In: Katz J, editor. Handbook of Clinical Audiology. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009. p. 64−79.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell G. Telephonic intelligibility. Philos Mag. 1910; 19:150–9.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher H, Steinberg JC. Articulation testing methods. Bell System Tech J. 1929;8:806–54.
   Google Scholar
• Kruger B, Mazor RM. Speech audiometry in the USA. In: Martin M, editor. Speech Audiometry. London: Taylor & Francis; 1987. p. 207−35.
   Google Scholar
• Mendel L, Danhauer J. Historical review of speech perception assessment. In: Mendel L, Danhauer J, editors. Audiologic Evaluation and Management and Speech Perception Assessment. San Diego: Singular; 1997. p. 1−5.
   Google Scholar
• Evans PIP. Speech audiometry for differential diagnosis. In: Martin M, editor. Speech Audiometry. London: Taylor & Francis; 1987. p. 109−25.
   Google Scholar
• BSA. Position statement: Auditory processing disorder (APD). 2011; Available from: http://www.thebsa.org.uk/images/stories/docs/BSA_APD_PositionPaper_31March11_FINAL.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• ASHA. (Central) Auditory Processing Disorders. [Technical Report] 2005; Available from: http://www.asha.org/members/deskref-journals/deskref/default.
   Google Scholar
• Bellis TJ. Comprehensive central auditory assessment. In: Bellis T, editor. Comprehensive Central Auditory Assessment and Management of Central Auditory Processing Disorders in the Educational Setting: from Science to Practice. 2nd edn. San Diego: Singular; 2002. p. 231−65.
   Google Scholar
• Green R. The uses and misuses of speech audiometry in rehabilitation. In: Martin M, editor. Speech Audiometry. 2nd edn. San Diego: Singular; 1997. p. 150−75.
   Google Scholar
• Parving A. The value of speech audiometry in hearing aid rehabilitation. Scand Audiol. 1991;20:159–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humes L. Modelling and predicting hearing aid outcome. Trends Amplif. 2003;7:41–75.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Humes L, Wilson D. An examination of changes in hearing aid performance and benefit in the elderly over a three-year period of hearing aid use. J Speech Hear Res. 2003;46: 137–45.
   Google Scholar
• Zwolan T. Cochlear implants. In: Medwetsky L, Burkard R, Hood L, editors. Handbook of Clinical Audiology. 6th edn. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009. p. 912−33.
   Google Scholar
• Hazan V. Speech perception tests for profoundly deaf listeners. In: Martin M, editor. Speech Audiometry. 2nd edn. San Diego: Singular; 1997. p. 195−207.
   Google Scholar
• Pedley K, Giles E. Aural rehabilitation following cochlear implantation: key objectives of an aural rehabilitation programme. In: Pedley K, Giles E, Hogan A, editors. Adult Cochlear Implant Rehabilitation. London: Whurr; 2005. p. 219−44.
   Google Scholar
• Eagles E, Wishik S. A study of hearing in children. Trans Am Acad Opthalmol Otol. 1961;65:261–82.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zakrzewski A, Jassem W, Pruszericz A. Speech audiometry for children and subjective probability of Polish words. Audiology. 1976;15:228.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kirk KI, Diefendorf AO, Pisoni DB, Robbins AM. Assessing speech perception in children. In: Mendel LL, Danhauer JL, editors. Audiologic Evaluation and Management and Speech Perception Assessment. San Diego: Singular; 1997. p. 101−32.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Y. Vocabulary of speech for hearing assessment. Chin J Otorhinolaryngol. 1955;3:40–5.
   Google Scholar
• Cai X. Speech audiometry. Chin J Otorhinolaryngol. 1963;9:8–10.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng J. Development of Chinese speech audiometry material. Chin J Otorhinolaryngol. 1966;12:106–8.
   Google Scholar
• Shen Y, Wang S. Development of a speech test material. Acta Psychological Sinica. 1983;3:316–28.
   Google Scholar
• Bao Z. Assessment for Chinese speech intelligibility of communication system. Audio Engineering. 1986;2:1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Gu R, Li X, Chen G. The staggered spondaic word test and the competing sentence test in Chinese: a normative investigation of Chinese test material. Acad J PLA Postgraduate Med School. 1985;6:31–4.
   Google Scholar
• Xi X. The history and present state of speech audiometry. Chin Sci J Hear Speech Rehabil. 2005;1:20–4.
   Google Scholar
• Gu R, Fu BT. Diagnostic significance of the staggered spondaic word test and 40-Hz auditory event-related potentials. Audiology. 1988;27:8–16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gu R, Zheng JF, Yu LM. Central low frequency hearing loss. Chin J Otorhinolaryngol. 2000;35:441–4.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Cao K, Wang Z. Development and primary application of Minimal Auditory Capabilities in Chinese (MACC). Chin J Otorhinolaryngol. 1990;25:79–82.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang J. Acoustics − Speech articulation testing method. National Standard GB/T 15508-1995, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang JL, Ma DY. The statistical relation between the articulation scores of several language units. J Acoustics. 1964; 1:90–4.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang H. The importance of developing Chinese speech audiometry materials. Chin J Otol. 2008;6:11–2.
   Google Scholar
• Pu X, Ni D. Promoting the standardization and clinical application of Chinese audiometry materials. Chin J Otol. 2008; 6:9–10.
   Google Scholar
• Dillon H, Ching T. What makes a good speech test? In: Plant G, Spens K, editors. Profound Deafness and Speech Communication. London: Whurr Publishers;1995. p. 305−44.
   Google Scholar
• Weekes B, Yin W, Su I, Chen M. The cognitive neuropsychology of reading and writing in Chinese. Lang Linguist. 2006; 7:595–617.
   Google Scholar
• Krenmayr A, Qi B, Liu B, Liu H, Chen X, Han D, et al. Development of a Mandarin tone identification test: sensitivity index d’ as a performance measure for individual tones. Int J Audiol. 2011;50:155–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu S, Han D, Han N, Liu B, Chen X, Guo L, et al. The use of Mandarin hearing in noise test in non-Mandarin speakers. J Clin Otorhinolaryngol. 2006;20:1079–84.
   Google Scholar
• Lin S, Ye S, Chen X. Speech test with Mandarin monosyllable lists in Fujian dialect speakers with normal hearing. Chin J Otol. 2012;10:233–6.
   Google Scholar
• Cai X, Zhang Y, Huang Y. The Cantonese dialect and Mandarin speech audiometric software for computerized audiometer: a preliminary report of exploratory research. Chin J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994;29:52–4.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng Y, Sproat R, Gu L, Shafran I, Zhou H, Su Y, et al. Accent detection and speech recognition for Shanghai- accented Mandarin. INTERSPEECH-2005. p. 217−20.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Zhang Q. Development of spondee lists of Shanxi dialect speech test materials. J Shanxi Med Univ. 2008;39: 720–2.
   Google Scholar
• Wong L, Soli S, Liu S, Han N, Huang M. Development of the Mandarin Hearing in Noise (MHINT). Ear Hear. 2007;28:S70–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang M, Wu J, Lin Y. Development of Mandarin monosyllabic Lexical Neighbourhood Test (LNT). Cochlear Implant Int. 2004;5:203–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yuen K, Ng I, Luk B, Chan SK, Chan SC, Kwok I, et al. The development of Cantonese Lexical Neighborhood Test: a pilot study. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2008;72:1121–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen X, Wang S, Kong Y, Wu Y, Zhou W, Wu W, et al. Development of Chinese computerized training and assessment system for adults hearing rehabilitation. J Audiol Speech Pathol. 2001;9:106–8.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Wang S, Chen J, Wang L, Shao G, Li Y, et al. The Mandarin Speech Test Materials (MSTMs): development and application. Chin Sci J Hear Speech Rehabil. 2008;6: 16–8.
   Google Scholar
• Ji F, Xi X. The development of Mandarin-Chinese phonetically balanced monosyllable words test lists. Chin J Otol. 2007;5:417–26.
   Google Scholar
• Ji F, Xi X, Chen A, Xu J, Qiu C, Dongyi H. The equivalence study of Mandarin monosyllable lists. Chin J Otol. 2008;6: 17–20.
   Google Scholar
• Nissen SL, Harris RW, Jennings LJ, Eggett DL, Buck H. Psychometrically equivalent trisyllabic words for speech reception threshold testing in Mandarin. Int J Audiol. 2005;44:391–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nissen SL, Harris RW, Jennings LJ, Eggett DL, Buck H. Psychometrically equivalent Mandarin bisyllabic speech discrimination materials spoken by male and female talkers. Int J Audiol. 2005;44:379–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun X, Yu L, Qu C, Liang W, Wang Q, Wei Z. An epidemiological study on the hearing-impaired population identified in China and proposed intervention strategies. Chin Sci J Hear Speech Rehabil. 2008;27:21–4.
   Google Scholar
• Sun X, Zhang F, Huang H, Zhang L. Assessment of speech and hearing for children with hearing impairment. J Audiol Speech Pathol. 2009;17:327–9.
   Google Scholar
• Sun X, Gao C, Yuan H. Assessment of hearing and speech rehabilitation for children with hearing impairment. Jilin: Jilin Educational Audio-Visual Publishing Co; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Chen X, Liu H, Chen A, Wu W, Zhang H, Wu Y. The formation of auditory and visual material in Chinese utilized in aural rehabilitation for hearing impaired children. J Audiol Speech Pathol. 2007;15:316–8.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang N, Liu S, Sheng Y, Guo L, Yang Y, Xu J. The development of Mandarin multisyllabic lexical neighbourhood test. Chin J Otol. 2008;6:30–4.
   Google Scholar
• Kirk K. Assessing speech perception in listeners with cochlear implants: the development of the Lexical Neighborhood Tests. Volta Rev. 1998;100:63–85.
   Google Scholar
• Xi X, Zhao Y, Ji F, Ching T, Han D. Homogeneity of Mandarin sentence intelligibility in babble noise. Chin J Otol. 2008;6:35–9.
   Google Scholar
• Xi X, Chen A, Li J, Ji F, Hong M, Yang S, et al. Standardized Mandarin sentence perception in babble noise test materials for children. J Audiol Speech Pathol. 2009;17:318–22.
   Google Scholar
• Xi X, Ching TYC, Ji F, Zhao Y, Li JN, Seymour J, et al. Development of a corpus of Mandarin sentences in babble with homogeneity optimized via psychometric evaluation. Int J Audiol. 2012;51:399–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao Y, Hua Q, Tao Z. The initial design of Mandarin word lists of tone discrimination for young children. J Audiol Speech Pathol. 2008;6:473–6.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng Y, Soli S, Wang K, Meng Z, Xu K, Tao Y. Development of the Mandarin paediatric speech intelligibility (MPSI) test. Int J Audiol. 2009;48:718–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng Y, Meng Z, Wang K, Tao Y, Xu K, Soli S. Development of the Mandarin early speech perception test: children with normal hearing and the effects of dialect exposure. Ear Hear. 2009;30:600–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau C, So K. Material for Cantonese speech audiometry constructed by appropriate phonetic principles. Brit J Audiol. 1988;22:297–304.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kei J, Chan T, Ma M, Ng L, Lowe C, Lai D, et al. Cantonese speech audiometry for children of Hong Kong. Aust J Audiol. 1991;13:41–5.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung DMC, Lee KYS. Speech Perception Assessment for Cantonese. Hong Kong: Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Cochlear Implant Working Group HK. Hong Kong Speech Perception Test Manual − Paediatric (HKSPTM-P). Hong Kong: Hospital Authority, Hong Kong; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Cochlear Implant Working Group HK. Hong Kong Speech Perception Test Manual (HKSPT). Hong Kong: Hospital Authority, Hong Kong; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Lee KYS. The Cantonese Basic Speech Perception Test (CBSPT). Hong Kong: Department of Surgery, the Chinese University of Hong Kong; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Xi X. Hearing in noise test: an important approach to evaluating the effects of hearing aids. Chin Sci J Hear Speech Rehabil. 2008;6:27–9.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson R. Adding speech in noise testing to your clinical protocol: why and how?Hear J. 2004;57:10–8.
   Google Scholar
• Wong L, Soli S. Development of the Cantonese version of the Hearing In Noise Test (HINT). Ear Hear. 2005;26: 276–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson M, Soli SD, Sullivan JA. Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am. 1994;95: 1085–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong L, Soli S, Liu S, Han N, Huang M. Development of the Mandarin Hearing in Noise Test (MHINT). Ear Hear. 2007;28:S70–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu J, Liu S. Speech developmental characteristics and selection of test in noise materials for children. J Audiol Speech Pathol. 2009;17:212–4.
   Google Scholar
• Yuen KC, Luan L, Li H, Wei C, Cao K, Yuan M, et al. Development of the computerized Mandarin Paediatric Lexical Tone and Disyllabic-word Picture Identification Test in Noise (MAPPID-N). Cochlear Implants Int. 2009;10:138–47.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cameron S, Dillon H. Development of the Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences Test (LISN-S). Ear Hear. 2007; 28:196–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron S, Dillon H. The Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences Test (LISN-S): Comparison to the prototype LISN and results from children with either a suspected (central) auditory processing disorder or a confirmed language disorder. J Am Acad Audiol. 2008;19:377–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee KYS, van Hasselt CA, Chiu SN, Cheung DMC. Cantonese tone perception ability of cochlear implant children compared with normal hearing children. Int J Paediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2002;63:137–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee KYS. The Cantonese Tone Identification Test (CanTIT). Hong Kong: Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, the Chinese University of Hong Kong; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Lee KYS, Ng IHY. The impact of hearing loss on speakers of tonal languages: insights from long-term studies on Cantonese speakers. In: Dupont JP, editor. Hearing Loss: Classification, Causes and Treatment. New York: Nova Science Publishers; 2011. p. 165−88.
   Google Scholar
• Nissen SL, Harris RW, Channell RW, Conklin B, Kim M, Wong L. The development of psychometrically equivalent Cantonese speech audiometry materials. Int J Audiol. 2011;50:191–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nissen SL, Harris RW, Slade KB. Development of speech reception threshold materials for speakers of Taiwan Mandarin. Int J Audiol. 2007;46:449–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisleder P, Hodgson WR. Evaluation of four Spanish word-recognition ability lists. Ear Hear. 1989;10:387–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang B. The preliminary development of Chinese speech audiometry. J Chin Med Assoc. 1960;7:219–24.
   Google Scholar
• Su Y. Speech hearing test: word lists for Chinese. J Formosan Med Assoc. 1962;61:94–104.
   Google Scholar
• Wang L, Su F. Development of Chinese phonetic balance word lists. J Taiwan Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1979; 14:87–96.
   Google Scholar
• Li Z. Chinese speech reception threshold test. J Chin Med Assoc. 1983;32:282–3.
   Google Scholar
• Lin R, Lee C, Chen S, Lee K. Spondee words lists for speech reception threshold test in Taiwanese. J Taiwan Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994;29:457–63.
   Google Scholar
• Li DCC. The sociolinguistic context of Mandarin in Taiwan: trends and developments. In: Chu C, Coblin WS, Tsao FE, editors. The Fourteenth International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics; Taipei, Taiwan: Student Book Company; 1983. p. 257−78.
   Google Scholar
• Chen HC, Li WF. Speech reception threshold test lists for preschool children. J Spec Educ Rehabil. 1999;7:183–217.
   Google Scholar
• Xi X. Validity, reliability and sensitivity of speech tests. Chin J Otol. 2008;6:1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Xi X, Yi F, Chen A. How to develop standardized Chinese speech test materials. Chin J Otol. 2008;6:13–6.
   Google Scholar
• Kruel E, Bell D, Nixon J. Factors affecting speech discrimination test difficulty. J Speech Hear Res. 1969;12:281–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen X. Assessment of auditory ability for infants. News and Review. 2011;26:106–8.
   Google Scholar
• Xi X. New progress of Chinese speech audiometry material. Chin J Ophthalm and Otorhinolaryngol. 2008;8:341–3.
   Google Scholar
• Wiley TL, Page AL. Summary: current and future perspectives on speech perception tests. In: Mendel LL, Danhauer JL, editors. Audiologic Evaluation and Management and Speech Perception Assessment. San Diego: Singular; 1997. p. 201−10.
   Google Scholar