Language development in infants: What do humans hear in the first months of life?

References

• Nespor M, Vogel I. Prosodic Phonology. 2nd edition 2007. Dordrecht: Foris; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Nespor M. On the rhythm parameter in phonology. In: Roca I, editor. Logical issues in language acquisition. Dordrecht: Foris; 1990. p. 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Ramus F, Nespor M, Mehler J. Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal. Cognition. 1999;73: 265–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nespor M, Shukla M, Mehler J. Stress-timed vs. syllable timed languages. In: van Oostendorp M, Ewen CJ, Hume E, Rice K, editors. The Blackwell Companion to Phonology. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2011. p. 1147–59.
   Google Scholar
• Nespor M, Guasti MT, Christophe A. Selecting word order: the Rhythmic Activation Principle. In: Kleinhenz U, editor. Interfaces in Phonology. Berlin: Akademie Verlag; 1996. p. 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Nespor M, Shukla M, van de Vijver R, Avesani C, Schraudolf H, Donati C. Different phrasal prominence realization in VO and OV languages. Lingue e Linguaggio. 2008;7:1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Siqueland ER, DeLucia CA. Visual reinforcement of non-nutritive sucking in human infants. Science. 1969;165: 1144–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eimas PD, Siqueland ER, Jusczyk P, Vigorito J. Speech perception in infants. Science. 1971;171:303–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottlieb G. Krasnegor NA. Measurement of Audition and Vision in the First Year of Postnatal Life: A Methodological Overview. Connecticut: Ablex; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Peña M, Maki A, Kovačić D, Dehaene-Lambertz G, Koizumi H, Bouquet F, Mehler J. Sounds and Silence: an optical topography study of language recognition at birth. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:11702–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benavides-Varela S, Hochmann JR, Macagno F, Nespor M, Mehler J. Newborns’ brain activity signals the origin of word memories. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:17908–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gervain J, Macagno F, Cogoi S, Peña M, Mehler J. The neonate brain detects speech structure. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:14222–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gervain J, Mehler J, Werker JF, Nelson CA, Csibra G, Lloyd-Fox S, et al. Near-infrared spectroscopy: a report from the McDonnell infant methodology consortium. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2011;1:22–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peña M, Pittaluga E, Mehler J. Language acquisition in premature and full-term infants. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:3823–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mahmoudzadeh M, Dehaene-Lambertz G, Fournier M, Kongolo G, Goudjil S, Dubois J, et al. Syllabic discrimination in premature human infants prior to complete formation of cortical layers. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:4431–2.
   Google Scholar
• Lecanuet JP, Granier-Deferre C, Jacquet AY, Capponi I, Ledru L. Prenatal discrimination of a male and female voice uttering the same sentence. Early Dev Parent. 1993;2: 217–28.
   Google Scholar
• Kisilevsky B, Hains S, Brown C, Lee C, Cowperthwaite B, Stutzman S, et al. Foetal sensitivity to properties of maternal speech and language. Infant Behav Dev. 2009;32:59–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehler J, Jusczyk P, Lambertz G, Halsted N, Bertoncini J, Amiel-Tison C. A Precursor of Language Acquisition in Young Infants. Cognition.1988;29:143–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon C, Panneton-Cooper R, Fifer WP. Two-day-olds prefer their native language. Infant Behav Dev. 1993;16:495–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazzi T, Bertoncini J, Mehler J. Language Discrimination by Newborns: Toward an Understanding of the Role of Rhythm. J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept Perform. 1998;24:1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeCasper AJ, Fifer WP. Of human bonding: Newborns prefer their mothers’ voices. Science. 1980;208:1174–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kisilevsky B, Hains S, Lee K, Xie X, Huang H, Zhang K, Wang Z. Effects of experience on foetal voice recognition. Psychobiol Sci. 2003;14:220–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eimas PD, Miller JL. Contextual effects in infant speech perception. Science. 1980;209:1140–1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehaene-Lambertz G, Peña M. Electrophysiological evidence for automatic phonetic processing in neonates. NeuroReport. 2001;12:3155–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sansavini A, Bertoncini J, Giovanelli G. Newborns discriminate the rhythm of multisyllabic stressed word. Dev Psychol. 1997;33:3–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutler A, Mehler J, Norris D, Segui J. The Syllable’s Differing Role in the Segmentation of French and English. J Mem Lang. 1986;25:385–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutler A, Mehler J, Norris D, Segui J. The Monolingual Nature of Speech Segmentation by Bilinguals. Cogn Psychol. 1992;24:381–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupoux E, Kakehi K, Hirose Y, Pallier C, Mehler J. Epenthetic vowels in Japanese: a perceptual illusion? J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept Perf.1999;25:1568–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhl PK. Human adults and human infants show a ‘perceptual magnet effect’ for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not. Percept Psychophys.1991;50:93–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhl PK, Williams KA, Lacerda F, Stevens KN, Lindblom B. Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by six months of age. Science. 1992;255:606–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werker JF, Tees RC. Cross-language speech perception: evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behav Dev. 1984;7:49–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehler J, Dupoux E. Naître Humain. Paris: Odile Jacob; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Mampe B, Friederici A, Christophe A, Wermke K. Newborns’ cry melody is shaped by their native language. Curr Biol. 2009;19:1994–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd James A. Speech Signals in Telephony. London; 1940.
   Google Scholar
• Pike KL. The Intonation of American English. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press; 1945.
   Google Scholar
• Abercrombie D. Elements of General Phonetics. Chicago: Aldine; 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Ladefoged P. A Course in Phonetics. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich; 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Borzone de Manrique AM, Signorini A. Segmental durations and the rhythm in Spanish. J Phon. 1983;11:117–28.
   Google Scholar
• Wenk B, Wiolland F. Is French really syllable-timed? J Phon. 1982;10:193–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertinetto PM. Strutture prosodiche dell’ italiano. Accento, quantità, sillaba, giuntura, fondamenti metrici. Firenze: Accademia della Crusca; 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Dauer R. Phonetic and phonological components of language rhythm. Paper presented at the XIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Tallinn; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Christophe A, Morton J. Is Dutch native English? Linguistic analysis by two-month-olds. Dev Sci. 1998;1:215–9.
   Google Scholar
• Bosch L, Sebastian-Galles N. Evidence of Early Language Discrimination Abilities in Infants From Bilingual Environments. Infancy. 2001;2:29–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nespor M, Peña M, Mehler J. On the Different Roles of Vowels and Consonants in Speech Processing and Language Acquisition. Lingue & Linguaggio 2003;2:203–31.
   Google Scholar
• Bonatti L, Peña M, Nespor M, Mehler J. Linguistic Constraints on Statistical Computations: The Role of Consonants and Vowels in Continuous Speech Processing. Psychol Sci. 2005;16:451–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toro JM, Bonatti LL, Nespor M, Mehler J. Finding words and rules in a speech stream: functional differences between vowels and consonants. Psychol Sci. 2008;19:137–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toro JM, Shukla M, Nespor M, Endress A. The quest for generalizations over consonants: asymmetries between consonants and vowels are not the by-product of acoustic differences. Percept Psychophys. 2008;70:1515–25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• New B, Nazzi T. The time-course of consonant and vowel processing during word recognition. Lang Cogn Process. 2012;1:1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Hochmann JR, Benavides S, Nespor M, Mehler J. Consonants and vowels: different roles in early language acquisition. Dev Sci. 2011;14:1445–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selkirk E. Phonology and syntax: the relation between sound and structure. Cambridge: The MIT Press; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Beckman M, Pierrehumbert J. Intonational structure in Japanese and English. Phonology Yearbook. 1986;3:15–70.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper WE, Paccia-Cooper J. Syntax and Speech. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Klatt DH. Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: acoustic and perceptual evidence. J Acoust Soc Am. 1976; 59:1208–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wightman CW, Shattuck-Hufnagel S, Ostendorf M, Price PJ. Segmental durations in the vicinity of prosodic phrase boundaries. J Acoust Soc Am. 1992;91:1707–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christophe A, Peperkamp S, Pallier C, Block E, Mehler J. Phonological phrase boundaries constrain lexical access: I. Adult data. J Mem Lang. 2004;51:523–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gout A, Christophe A, Morgan J. Phonological phrase boundaries constrain lexical access: II. Infant data. J Mem Lang. 2004;51:547–67.
   Google Scholar
• Peña M, Bonatti L, Nespor M, Mehler J. Signal-Driven Computations in Speech Processing. Science. 2002;298: 604–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langus A, Marchetto E, Bion RAH, Nespor M. Can prosody be used to discover hierarchical structure in continuous speech? J Mem Lang. 2012;66:285–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dryer MS. The order of subject, object and verb. In: Haspelmath M, Dryer MS, Gil D, Comrie B, editors. The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2005. p. 330–3.
   Google Scholar
• Bolton T. Rhythm. Am J Psychol. 1894;6:145–238.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper G, Meyer L. The Rhythmic Structure of Music. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1960.
   Google Scholar
• Woodrow H. Time perception. In: Stevens S, editor. Handbook of Experimental Psychology. New York: Wiley; 1951. p. 1224–36.
   Google Scholar
• Bion RAH, Benavides-Varela S, Nespor M. Acoustic markers of prominence influence infants’ and adults’ segmentation of speech sequences. Lang Speech. 2011;54:123–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kayne RS. The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky N. Minimalist Program. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Newmeyer FJ. On the reconstruction of ‘Proto-world’ word order. In: Knight C, Hurford JR, Studdert-Kennedy M, editors. The Evolutionary Emergence of Language: social function and the origins of linguistic form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Gell-Mann M, Ruhlen M. The origin and evolution of word order. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:17290–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lenneberg EH. Biological Foundations of Language. Wiley; 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Chin SB, Bergeson TR, Phan J. Speech intelligibility and prosody production in children with cochlear implants. J Commun Disord. 2012;45:355–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meister H, Tepeli D, Wagner P, Hess W, Walger M, von Wedel H, Lang-Roth R. Experiments on prosody perception with cochlear implants. HNO. 2007;55:264–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciocca V, Francis AL, Aisha R, Wong L. The perception of Cantonese lexical tones by early-deafened cochlear implantees, J Acoust Soc Am. 2002;111:2250–6.
   Google Scholar
• Nakata T, Trehub SE, Kanda Y. Effect of cochlear implants on children’s perception and production of speech prosody. J Acoust Soc Am. 2012;131:1307–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peña M, Bion RAH, Nespor M. How modality specific is the Iambic-Trochaic Law? Evidence from vision. J Exp Psychol: Learn Mem Cogn. 2011;37:1199–1208.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar