Technological advances in Universal Neonatal Hearing Screening (UNHS)

References

• Kemp DT. Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am. 1978;64:1386–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciorba A, Hatzopoulos S, Camurri L, Negossi L, Rossi M, Cosso D, et al. Neonatal Newborn Hearing Screening: Four Years Of Experience At The Ferrara University Hospital (Cheap Project). Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2007;27:10–16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• White KR, Vohr BR, Meyer S, Widen JE, Johnson JL, Gravel JS, et al. A multisite study to examine the efficacy of the otoacoustic emission/automated auditory brainstem response newborn hearing screening protocol: research design and results of the study. Am J Audiol. 2005;14:S186–99.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cone-Wesson B, Dowell R, Tomlin D, Rance G, Ming Wu. The Auditory Steady State Response. Comparisons with the Auditory Brainstem Response. J Am Acad Audiol. 2002; 13:173–87.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dimitrijevic A, John MS, van Roon P, Purcell DW, Adamonis J, Ostroff J, et al. Estimating the Audiogram Using Multiple Auditory Steady State Responses. J Am Acad Audiol. 2002;13:205–24.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• John MS, Picton TW. Human auditory steady-state responses to amplitude-modulated tones: phase and latency measurements. Hear Res. 2000;141:57–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorga MP, Neely ST, Hoover BM, Dierking DM, Beauchaine KL, Manning C. Determining the upper limits of stimulation for auditory steady-state response measurements. Ear Hear. 2004;25:302–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luts H, Desloovere C, Kumar A, Vandermeersch E, Wouters J. Objective assessment of frequency-specific hearing thresholds in babies. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2004; 68:915–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanepoel D, Hugo R, Roode R. Auditory steady-state responses for children with severe to profound hearing loss. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130:531–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciorba A, Hatzopoulos S, Petruccelli J, Mazzoli M, Pastore A, Kochanek K, et al. Identifying congenital hearing impairment: preliminary results from a comparative study using objective and subjective audiometric protocols.Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2013;33:29–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead ML, McCoy MJ, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK. Dependence of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in primary tone level in normal and impaired ears. I. Effects of decreasing L2 below L1. J Acoust Soc Am. 1995; 97:2346–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead ML, Stagner BB, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK. Effects of ear-canal standing waves on measurements of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am. 1995;98:3202–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shera CA, Guinan JJ Jr. Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs. J Acoust Soc Am. 1999;105:782–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen T, Kummer P, Arnold W. Growth behavior of the 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission in tinnitus. J Acoust Soc Am. 1998;103:3418–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorn PA, Konrad-Martin D, Neely ST, Keefe DH, Cyr E, Gorga MP. Distortion product otoacoustic emission input/output functions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired human ears. J Acoust Soc Am. 2001;110:3119–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorga MP, Neely ST, Dierking DM, Dorn PA, Hoover BM, Fitzpatrick DF. Distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired human ears. J Acoust Soc Am. 2003; 114:263–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills DM, Rubel ED. Development of the cochlear amplifier. J Acoust Soc Am. 1996;100:428–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kummer P, Janssen T, Arnold W. The level and growth behavior of the 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission and its relationship to auditory sensitivity in normal hearing and cochlear hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am. 1998; 103:3431–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boege P, Janssen T. Pure tone threshold estimation from extrapolated distortion product otoacoustic emission I/O functions in normal and cochlear hearing loss ears. J Acoust Soc Am. 2002;111:1810–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorga MP, Neely ST, Dorn PA, Hoover BM. Further efforts to predict pure tone thresholds from distortion product otoacoustic emission input/output functions. J Acoust Soc Am. 2003;113:3275–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen T, Klein A, Gehr D. Automatische Hörschwellenbestimung bei Neugeborenen mit extrapolierten DPOAE-Wachstumsfunktionen. Eine neue Hörscreening-Methode. HNO. 2003;16:125–8.
   Google Scholar
• Oswald JA, Janssen T. Weighted DPOAE I/O functions: a tool for automatically assessing hearing loss in clinical application. Z Med Physik. 2003;13:93–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hatzopoulos S, Petruccelli J, Ciorba A, Martini A. Optimizing otoacoustic emission protocols for a UNHS programme. Audiol Neurotol. 2009;14:7–16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hatzopoulos S, Ciorba A, Petruccelli J, Grasso D, Sliwa L, Skarzynski H, et al. Estimation of the Hearing Threshold Using behavioral Audiometry, Cochlea-Scan and ASSR protocols. Int J Audiol. 2009;48:625–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sliwa L, Kochanek K, Pilka A, Senderski A, Sulkowski W, Skarzynski H. Assessment of usefulness of objective and audiometric methods in hearing screening of school children. In: 9th EFAS Congress, Puerto de la Cruz, Tenerife, 21– 24 June, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Sliwa L, Hatzopoulos S, Kochanek K, Piłka A, Senderski A, Skarzynski H. A comparison of audiometric and objective methods in hearing screening of school children: a preliminary study. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;75:483–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stueve MP, O’Rourke C. Estimation of hearing loss in children: comparison of auditory steady-state response, auditory brainstem response, and behavioral test methods. Am J Audiol. 2003;12:125–36.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar