Mechanisms of music perception and its changes in hearing impaired people

References

• Veekmans K, Ressel L, Mueller J, Vischerf M, Brockmeiere SJ. Comparison of music perception in bilateral and unilateral cochlear implant users and normal-hearing subjects. Audiol Neurotol. 2009;14:315–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore BC. The role of temporal fine structure processing in pitch perception, masking, and speech perception for normal hearing and hearing impaired people. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2008;9:399–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Looi V, McDermott H, McKay C. Hickson L. Music perception of cochlear implant users compared with that of hearing aid users. Ear Hear. 2008a;29:421–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chasin M, Russo FA. Hearing aids and music. Trends Amplif. 2004;8:34–47.
   Google Scholar
• Snow WB. Audible frequency ranges of music, speech and noise. J Acoust Soc Am. 1931;3:616–27.
   Google Scholar
• Drennan WR, Rubinstein JR. Music perception in cochlear implant users and its relationship with psychophysical capabilities. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008;45:779–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gfeller K, Lansing CR. Melodic, rhythmic, and timbral perception of adult cochlear implant users. J Speech Hear Res. 1991;34:916–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kong YY, Stickney GS, Zeng FG. Speech and melody recognition in binaurally combined acoustic and electric hearing. J Acoust Soc Am. 2005;117:1351–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uys M. Development of a music perception test for adult hearing-aid users. S Afr J Commun Disord. 2011;58:19–47.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pomerantz JR. Perception: Overview. In: Nadel N, ed. Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. London: Nature Publishing Group; 2003. p. 527–37.
   Google Scholar
• Tan SL, Pfordresher P, Harre R. Psychology of Music. From Sound to Significance. Brighton: Psychology Press; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Rossing TD, Moore FR, Wheeler PA. The science of sound. 3rd edn. San Francisco: Addison Wesley; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• McDermott HJ. Music perception with cochlear implants: a review. Trends Amplif. 2004;8:49–82.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Acoustical Society of America: American Standards Acoustic Terminology. 1960. New York: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Gfeller K, Turner C, Oleson J, Zhang X, Gantz B, Froman R, et al. Accuracy of cochlear implant recipients on pitch perception, melody recognition, and speech reception in noise. Ear Hear. 2007;28:412–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore BC. Perceptual consequences of cochlear hearing loss and their implications for the design of hearing aids. Ear Hear. 1996;17:133–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullington HE, Zeng FG. Comparison of bimodal and bilateral cochlear implant users on speech recognition with competing talker, music perception, affective prosody discrimination, and talker identification. Ear Hear. 2011;32:16–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gfeller K, Turner C, Mehr M, Woodworth G, Fearn R, Knutson JF, et al. Recognition of familiar melodies by adult cochlear implant recipients and normal hearing adults. Cochlear Implants Int. 2002a;3:29–53.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gfeller K, Witt S, Adamek M, Mehr M, Rogers J, Stordahl J, et al. Effects of training on timbre recognition and appraisal by post-lingually deafened cochlear implant recipients. J Am Acad Audiol. 2002b;13:132–45.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Looi V, She J. Music perception of cochlear implant users: a questionnaire, and its implications for a music training program. Int J Audiol. 2010;49:116–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leek MR, Molis MR, Kubli LR, Tufts JB. Enjoyment of music by elderly hearing impaired listeners. J Am Acad Audiol. 2008;19:519–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Looi V, McDermott H, McKay C, Hickson L. The effect of cochlear implantation on music perception by adults with usable pre-operative acoustic hearing. Int J Audiol. 2008b;47: 257–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fata EF, James CJ, Laborde ML, Fraysse B. How much residual hearing is ‘useful’ for music perception with cochlear implants?. Audiol Neurootol. 2009;14:14–21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brockmeier SJ, Fitzgerald D, Searle O, Fitzgerald H, Grasmeder ML, Hilbig S, et al. The MuSIC perception test: a novel battery for testing music perception of cochlear implant users. Cochlear Impl Int. 2011;12:10–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sucher CM, McDermott HJ. Bimodal stimulation: benefits for music perception and sound quality. Cochlear Impl Int. 2009;10:96–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leal MC, Shin YJ, Laborde ML, Calmels M, Verges S, Lugardon S, et al. Music perception in adult cochlear implant recipients. Acta Otolaryngologica. 2003;123:826–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahne T, Böhme L, Götze G. Timbre discrimination in cochlear implant users and normal hearing subjects using cross-faded synthetic tones. J Neurosci Methods. 2011;15 :290–5.
   Google Scholar
• Darrow AA. An investigative study: the effect of hearing impairment on musical aptitude. J Music Ther. 1987;24:88–96.
   Google Scholar
• Kong YY, Cruz R, Jones JA, Zeng FG. Music perception with temporal cues in acoustic and electric hearing. Ear Hear. 2004;25:173–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golub JS, Won JH, Drennan WR, Worman TD, Rubinstein JT. Spectral and temporal measures in hybrid cochlear implant users: on the mechanism of electroacoustic hearing benefits. Otol Neurotol. 2012;33;147–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firszt JB, Koch DB, Downing M, Litvak L. Current steering creates additional pitch perceptions in adult cochlear implant recipients. Otol Neurotol. 2007;28:629–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahlstrom JB, Horwitz AR, Dubno JR. Spatial benefit of bilateral hearing aids. Ear Hear. 2009;30:203–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neher T, Behrens T, Carlile S, Jin C, Kragelund L, Petersen AS, et al. Benefit from spatial separation of multiple talkers in bilateral hearing aid users: effects of hearing loss, age, and cognition. Int J Audiol. 2009;48:758–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar