Auditory cortical processing in noise in younger and older adults

References

• Gott P, Hughes E. Effect of noise masking on the brainstem and middle-latency auditory evoked potentials: central and peripheral components. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1989;74:131–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jerger J, Musiek F. Report of the consensus conference on the diagnosis of auditory processing disorders in school-aged children. J Am Acad Audiol. 2000;11:467–74.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dubno J, Dirks D, Morgan D. Effects of age and mild hearing loss on speech recognition in noise. J Acoust Soc Am. 1984;76:87–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon-Salant S. Age related differences in speech recognition performance as a function of test format and paradigm. Ear Hear. 1987;8:277–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon-Salant S, Fitzgibbons P. Selected cognitive factors and speech recognition performance among young and elderly listeners. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997;40:423–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snell K, Mapes F, Hickman E, Frisina DR. Word recognition in competing babble and the effects of age, temporal processing, and absolute sensitivity. J Acoust Soc Am. 2002;112: 720–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart A, Phillips D. Word recognition in continuous and interrupted broadband noise by young normal-hearing, older normal-hearing, and presbyacusic listeners. Ear Hear. 1996;17:478–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boettcher F, Mills J, Swerdoff J, Holley B. Auditory evoked potentials in aged gerbils: responses elicited by noises separated by a silent gap. Hear Res. 1996;102:167–78.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mendelson J, Ricketts T. Agerelated temporal processing speed deterioration in auditory cortex. Hear Res. 2001;158: 84–94.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Walton J, Frisina R, O’Neill W. Age related alteration in processing of temporal sound features in the auditory midbrain of the CBA mouse. J Neurosci. 1998;18:2764–76.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harris K, Dubno J, Keren N, Ahlstrom J, Eckert M. Speech recognition in younger and older adults: a dependency on low-level auditory cortex. J Neurosci. 2009;29: 6078–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plomp R, Mimpen A. Speech reception threshold for sentences as a function of age and noise level. J Acoust Soc Am. 1979;66:1333–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang J, Li C, Wu C, Chen J, Liu T. Aging effects on the activation of the auditory cortex during binaural speech listening in white noise: an fMRI study. Audiol Neurotol. 2007;12:285–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong P, Jin J, Gunasekera G, Abel R, Lee E, Dhar S. Aging and cortical mechanisms of speech perception in noise. Neuropsychologia. 2009;47:693–703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong P, Ettlinger M, Sheppard J, Gunasekera B, Dhar S. Neuroanatomical characteristics and speech perception in noise in older adults. Ear Hear. 2010;31:471–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady H, Harman D, Ordy J. Aging, Vol. 1: Clinical, morphologic, and neurochemical aspects in the aging central nervous system. New York: Raven Press; 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Elberling C, Bak C, Kofoed B, Lebech J, Saermark K. Auditory magnetic fields from the human cerebral cortex: location and strength of an equivalent current dipole. Acta Neurol Scand. 1982;65:553–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherg M, von Cramon D. Evoked dipole source potentials of the human auditory cortex. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1986;65:344–60.
   Google Scholar
• Scherg M, Vajar J, Picton T. A source analysis of the late human auditory evoked potentials. J Cogn Neurosci. 1989; 1:336–55.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vaughan H, Ritter W. The sources of auditory evoked responses recorded from the human scalp.Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1970;28:360–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Billings CJ, Tremblay KL, Stecker GC, Tolin WM. Human evoked cortical activity to signal-to-noise ratio and absolute signal level. Hear Res. 2009;254:15–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCullagh J, Musiek F, Shinn J. Auditory cortical processing in noise in normal-hearing young adults. Audiol Med. 2012;10:114–21.
   Google Scholar
• Bertoli S, Smurzynski J, Probst R. Effects of age, age related hearing loss, and contralateral cafeteria noise on the discrimination of small frequency changes: psychoacoustic and electrophysiological measures. J Assoc Res Otoloaryngol. 2005;6:207–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cranford J, Martin D. Age related changes in binaural processing: I. Evoked potential findings. Am J Otol. 1991; 12:357–64.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gregoire J, vn der Linden M. Effect of age on forward and backward digit spans. Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 1997;4: 140–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carhart R, Jerger J. Preferred method for clinical determination of pure-tone thresholds. J Speech Hear Disord. 1959; 16:340–5.
   Google Scholar
• Weihing J, Musiek F. An electrophysiological measure of binaural hearing in noise. J Am Acad Adiol. 2008;19: 481–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jirsa R. The clinical utility of the P3 AERP in children with auditory processing disorders. J Speech Hear Res. 1992; 35:903–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Greenhouse W, Geisser S. On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika. 1959; 24:95–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shetake J, Wolf J, Cheung R, Engineer C, Ram S, Kilgard M. Cortical activity patterns predict robust speech discrimination ability in noise. Eur J Neurosci. 2011;34:1823–38.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Papanicolaou A, Loring D, Eisenberg H. Age related differences in recovery cycle of auditory evoked potentials. Neurobiol Aging. 1984;5:291–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremblay K, Billings C, Rohila N. Speech evoked cortical potentials: effects of age and stimulus presentation rate. J Am Acad Audiol. 2004;15:226–37.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peters A. The effects of normal aging on myelin and nerve fibers: a review. J Neurocytol. 2002;31:581–93.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goodin D, Squires K, Henderson B, Starr A. Age related variations in evoked potentials to auditory stimuli in normal human subjects. Electroencephal Clin Neurophysiol. 1978; 44:447–58.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Picton T, Stuss D, Champagne S, Nelson R. The effect of age on human event-related potentials. Psychophysiol. 1984; 21:312–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfefferbaum A, Ford J, Roth W, Kopell B. Age related changes in auditory event-related potentials. Electroencephal Clin Neurophysiol. 1980;49:266–76.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anderer P, Semlitsch H, Saletu B. Multichannel auditory event-related brain potentials: Effects of normal aging on scalp distribution of N1, P2, N1, and P300 latencies and amplitudes. Electroencephal Clin Neurophysiol. 1996;99: 458–72.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pfefferbaum A, Ford J, Wenegrat B, Roth W, Kopell B. Clinical application of the P3 component of event-related potentials. I. Normal aging. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1984;59:85–103.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Caspary D, Ling L, Turner J, Hughes L. Inhibitory neurotransmission, plasticity, and aging in the mammalian central auditory system. J Exp Biol. 2008;211:1781–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeChicchis A, Carpenter M, Cranford J, Hymel M. Electrophysiological correlates of attention versus distraction in young and elderly listeners. J Am Acad Audiol. 2002;13: 383–91.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar