142
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Evaluation of non-linear frequency compression hearing aids using speech P1-cortical auditory evoked potential

, &
Pages 36-43 | Accepted 03 Aug 2015, Published online: 21 Aug 2015

References

  • McCreery R, Venediktov R, Coleman J, Leech H. An evidence based systematic review of frequency lowering in hearing aids for school-age children with hearing loss. Am J Audiol. 2012;21:313–28.
  • Stelmachowicz P, Hoover B. Hearing instrument fitting and verification for children. In: Katz J, editor. Handbook of clinical audiology. 6th edn. Philadelphia: Williams & Wilkins; 2009. p. 827–45.
  • Simpson A, Hersbach A, McDermott H. Frequency- compression outcomes in listeners with steeply sloping audiograms. Int J Audiol. 2006;45:619–29.
  • Kuk F, Korhonen P, Peeters H, Keenan D, Jessen A, Andersen H. Linear frequency transposition: extending the audibility of high frequency information. Hear Rev. 2006;13: 44–6.
  • Alexander J. Individual variability in recognition of frequency-lowered speech. Semin Hear. 2013;34:86–109.
  • Glista D, Scollie S, Begatto M, Seewald R, Parsa V, Johnson A. Evaluation of non-linear frequency compression: clinical outcomes. Int J Audiol. 2009;48:632–44.
  • Wolfe A, John E, Schafer E. Long-term effects of non-linear frequency compression for children with moderate hearing loss. Int J Audiol. 2011;50:396–404.
  • Villase M, Dillon H, Martin R. New tool evaluates HA fittings in babies. Hear J. 2008;61:50–2.
  • van Dun B, Carter L, Dillon H. Sensitivity of cortical auditory evoked potential detection for hearing impaired infants in response to short speech sounds. Audiol Res. 2012;2: 65–76.
  • Hyde M. The N1 response and its applications. Audiol Neuro-otol. 1997;25:281–307.
  • Golding M, Pearce W, Seymour J, Cooper A, Ching T, Dillon H. The relationship between obligatory cortical auditory evoked potentials and functional measures in young infants. J Am Acad Audiol. 2007;18:117–25.
  • Glista D, Easwar V, Purcell D, Schollie S. A pilot study on cortical auditory evoked potentials in children: aided CAEPs reflect improved high-frequency audibility with frequency compression hearing aid technology. International Journal of Otolaryngology. 2012;2012:1–12.
  • Zhang V, Ching T, van Buynder P, Hou S, Flynn C, Burns L, et al. Aided cortical response, speech intelligibility, consonant perception and functional performance of young children using conventional amplification or non-linear frequency compression. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;78:1692–1700.
  • Northern L, Downs P. Hearing in children. In: Katz J, Burkard R, editors. Handbook of Clinical Audiology. 5th edn. United States of America: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1991. p. 469–80.
  • Soliman S, El-Mahalawi T. Simple speech test as a predictor for speech reception threshold (SRT) in preschool children. Master thesis, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, 1984. Available from: http: URL: library.shams.edu.eg , www.audiology-ainshams.com.
  • Scollie S, Seewald R, Moodie K, Dekok K. Preferred listening levels of children who use hearing aids: comparison to prescriptive targets. J Am Acad Audiol. 2000;11:230–8.
  • Wall G, Davidson A, Dalebout D. Determining latency and amplitude for multiple peaked P300 waveforms. J Am Acad Audiol. 1991;2:189–94.
  • Helm L. The effect of non-linear frequency compression and linear frequency transposition on speech perception in school-aged children. Independent Studies and Capstones. Paper 609. Program in Audiology and Communication Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine (Online). 2010. Available from: URL: http://digitalcommons.wustl.edu/pacs_capstones/609
  • Bentler R, Walker E, McCreery M, Arenas R, Roush P. Non-linear frequency compression in hearing aids: impact on speech and language development. Ear Hear. 2014;35: e143–52.
  • Barnet A. EEG audiometry in children under three years of age. Acta Oto-Laryngologica. 1971;72:1–13.
  • Pang E, Taylor M. Tracking the development of the N1 from age three years to adulthood: an examination of speech and non-speech stimuli. Clin Neurophysiol. 2000;111:388–97.
  • Nossair A, El Danasoury I, El Kholy W, Hassan D. Study of p1 speech evoked response in different paediatric age groups. Master thesis, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, 2012. http: URL: library.shams.edu.eg.
  • Sharma A, Glick H, Campbell J, Biever A. Central auditory development in children with hearing loss: clinical relevance of the p1 CAEP biomarker in hearing impaired children with multiple disabilities. Hear Balance Commun. 2013;11:110–20.
  • Alvarenga K, Vicente L, Lopes R, Ventura L, Bevilacqua M, Moret A.Development of P1 cortical auditory evoked potential in children presented with sensorineural hearing loss following cochlear implantation: a longitudinal study. CoDAS. 2013;25:521–6.
  • Huttenlocher P, Dhabholkar A. Regional differences in synaptogenesis in human cerebral cortex. J Comput Neurol. 1997;87:167–78.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.