Effect of tinnitus location on the psychoacoustic measures of hearing

References

• Eggermont JJ, Roberts LE. The neuroscience of tinnitus. Trends Neurosci. 2004;27:676–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiang NY, Moxon EC, Levine RA. Auditory nerve activity in cats with normal and abnormal cochleas. In: Sensorineural hearing loss. Ciba Found Symp. 1970;92:241–73.
   Google Scholar
• LePage EL. Frequency-dependent self-induced bias of the basilar membrane and its potential for controlling sensitivity and tuning in the mammalian cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am. 1987;82:139–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jastreboff PJ. Phantom auditory perception (tinnitus): mechanisms of generation and perception. Neurosci Res. 1990;8:221–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• House JW, Brackmann DE. Tinnitus: surgical treatment. Ciba Found Symp. 1981;85:204–16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaltenbach JA, Zhang J, Finlayson P. Tinnitus as a plastic phenomenon and its possible neural underpinnings in the dorsal cochlear nucleus. Hear Res. 2005;206:200–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits M, Kovacs S, de Ridder D, Peeters RR, van Hecke P, Sunaert S. Lateralization of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) activation in the auditory pathway of patients with lateralized tinnitus. Neuroradiology. 2007;49:669–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penner MJ, Jastreboff PJ. Tinnitus: psychophysical observations in humans and an animal model. In: van de Water TR, Popper AN, Fay RR, editors. Clinical Aspects of Hearing (Internet). New York, NY: Springer New York; 1996 [cited 2015 Feb 19]. p. 258–304.
   Google Scholar
• Axelsson A, Ringdahl A. Tinnitus: a study of its prevalence and characteristics. Br J Audiol. 1989;23:53–62.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barnea G, Attias J, Gold S, Shahar A. Tinnitus with normal hearing sensitivity: extended high-frequency audiometry and auditory-nerve brainstem-evoked responses. Audiology. 1990;29:36–45.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Newman CW, Wharton JA, Shivapuja BG, Jacobson GP. Relationships among psychoacoustic judgments, speech understanding ability and self-perceived handicap in tinnitus subjects. Audiology. 1994;33:47–60.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goldstein B, Shulman A. Tinnitus - Hyperacusis and the Loudness Discomfort Level Test - A Preliminary Report. Int Tinnitus J. 1996;2:83–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Turner JG, Brozoski TJ, Bauer CA, Parrish JL, Myers K, Hughes LF, et al. Gap detection deficits in rats with tinnitus: a potential novel screening tool. Behav Neurosci. 2006;120:188–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanches SGG, Samelli AG, Nishiyama AK, Sanchez TG, Carvallo RMM. GIN Test (Gaps-in-Noise) in normal listeners with and without tinnitus. Pró-Fono Rev Atualização Científica. 2010;22:257–62.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fournier P, Hébert S. Gap detection deficits in humans with tinnitus as assessed with the acoustic startle paradigm: does tinnitus fill in the gap? Hear Res. 2013;295:16–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musiek FE, Shinn JB, Jirsa R, Bamiou D-E, Baran JA, Zaida E. GIN (Gaps-In-Noise) Test performance in subjects with confirmed central auditory nervous system involvement. Ear Hear. 2005;26:608–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggermont JJ. Between sound and perception: reviewing the search for a neural code. Hear Res. 2001;157:1–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore BCJ. Detection of changes in modulation depth of a target sound in the presence of other modulated sounds. J Acoust Soc Am [Internet]. 1992 [cited 2015 Feb 19];91(2):1051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musiek FE, Baran JA, Pinheiro ML. Duration pattern recognition in normal subjects and patients with cerebral and cochlear lesions. Audiology. 1990;29:304–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pastor MA, Macaluso E, Day BL, Frackowiak RSJ. The neural basis of temporal auditory discrimination. NeuroImage. 2006;30:512–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rammsayer TH, Lima SD. Duration discrimination of filled and empty auditory intervals: cognitive and perceptual factors. Percept Psychophys. 1991;50:565–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiller PH. Forward and backward masking as a function of relative overlap and intensity of test and masking stimuli. Percept Psychophys [Internet]. 1966 May [cited 2015 Feb 19];1(3):161–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen Y, Richards VM. Temporal modulation transfer function for efficient assessment of auditory temporal resolution. J Acoust Soc Am. 2013;133:1031–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanneste S, Plazier M, van der Loo E, van de Heyning P, de Ridder D. The difference between uni- and bilateral auditory phantom percept. Clin Neurophysiol. 2011;122:578–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasama JP, Moller MB, Moller AR. Microvascular decompression of the cochlear nerve in patients with severe tinnitus. Preoperative findings and operative outcome in 22 patients. Neurol Res. 1998;20:242–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zacharia T, Naik PV, Sada S, Kuniyil JG, Dwarakanath VM. Development and standardization of tinnitus handicap inventory in Kannada. Int Tinnitus J. 2012;17:117–23.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kumar AU, Sangamanatha AV. Temporal processing abilities across different age groups. J Am Acad Audiol. 2011;22:5–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musiek FE, Pinheiro ML. Frequency patterns in cochlear, brainstem, and cerebral lesions. Audiology. 1987;26:79–88.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grassi M, Soranzo A. MLP: a MATLAB toolbox for rapid and reliable auditory threshold estimation. Behav Res Methods. 2009;41:20–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker RJ, Rosen S. Minimising boredom by maximising likelihood: an efficient estimation of masked thresholds. Br J Audiol. 1998;11:187–200.
   Google Scholar
• Fabijańska A, Smurzyński J, Hatzopoulos S, Kochanek K, Bartnik G, Raj-Koziak D, et al. The relationship between distortion product otoacoustic emissions and extended high-frequency audiometry in tinnitus patients. Part 1: normally hearing patients with unilateral tinnitus. Med Sci Monit. 2012;18:765–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yildirim G, Berkiten G, Kuzdere M, Ugras H. High frequency audiometry in patients presenting with tinnitus. Int Adv Otol. 2010;6:401–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vielsmeier V, Lehner A, Strutz J, Steffens T, Kreuzer PM, Schecklmann M, et al. The Relevance of the High Frequency Audiometry in Tinnitus Patients with Normal Hearing in Conventional Pure-Tone Audiometry. Biomed Research Int. in press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson GP, McCaslin DL. A re-examination of the long latency N1 response in patients with tinnitus. J Am Acad Audiol. 2003;14:393–400.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• An Y-H, Jin SY, Yoon SW, Shim HJ. The effects of unilateral tinnitus on auditory temporal resolution: gaps-in-noise performance. Korean J Audiol [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2015 Aug 20];18(3):119.
   Google Scholar
• Lindblad A-C, Hagerman B, Rosenhall U. Noise-induced tinnitus: a comparison between four clinical groups without apparent hearing loss. Noise Health. 2011;13:423–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehdizade Gilani V, Ruzbahani M, Mahdi P, Amali A, Nilforush Khoshk MH, Sameni J, et al. Temporal processing evaluation in tinnitus patients: results on analysis of gap in noise and duration pattern test. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;25:221–6.
   Google Scholar
• Jain S, Vasudevamurthy BP, Raghavendra AP. Maturation of temporal processing in children: measurement using speech and non-speech stimuli. J Hear Sci. 2015;5:1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Boyen K, Başkent D, van Dijk P. The gap detection test: can it be used to diagnose tinnitus? Ear Hear. 2015;36:e138–45.
   Google Scholar
• Shinn JB, Chermak GD, Musiek FE. GIN (Gaps-In-Noise) performance in the pediatric population. J Am Acad Audiol [Internet]. 2009 Apr 1 [cited 2015 Aug 20];20(4):229–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noreña AJ, Eggermont JJ. Enriched acoustic environment after noise trauma abolishes neural signs of tinnitus. Neuroreport. 2006;17:559–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts LE, Eggermont JJ, Caspary DM, Shore SE, Melcher JR, Kaltenbach JA. Ringing ears: the neuroscience of tinnitus. J Neurosci. 2010;30:14972–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlee W, Mueller N, Hartmann T, Keil J, Lorenz I, Weisz N. Mapping cortical hubs in tinnitus. BMC Biol [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2015 Feb 19];7(1):80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pienkowski M, Eggermont JJ. Long-term, partially-reversible reorganization of frequency tuning in mature cat primary auditory cortex can be induced by passive exposure to moderate-level sounds. Hear Res. 2009;257:24–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar UA, Ameenudin S, Sangamanatha AV. Temporal and speech processing skills in normal hearing individuals exposed to occupational noise. Noise Health. 2012;14:100–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke JE, Zhang H, Kelly JB. Detection of sinusoidal amplitude modulated sounds: deficits after bilateral lesions of auditory cortex in the rat. Hear Res. 2007;231:90–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter BA, Rosenthal TR, Ranasinghe KG, Kilgard MP. Discrimination of brief speech sounds is impaired in rats with auditory cortex lesions. Behav Brain Res. 2011;219:68–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brosch M, Schulz A, Scheich H. Neuronal mechanisms of auditory backward recognition masking in macaque auditory cortex. Neuroreport. 1998;9:2551–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar