The effect of short fiber composite base on microleakage and load-bearing capacity of posterior restorations

References

• Park J, Chang J, Ferracane J, Lee IB. How should composite be layered to reduce shrinkage stress: incremental or bulk filling? Dent Mater. 2008;24:1501–1505
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fennis WM, Kuijs RH, Roeters FJ, Creugers NH, Kreulen CM. Randomized control trial of composite cuspal restorations: five-year results. J Dent Res. 2014;93:36–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garoushi S, Lassila LVJ, Vallittu PK. Fiber-reinforced composite substructure: load bearing capacity of an onlay restoration. Acta Odontol Scand. 2006;64:281–285
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu HH, Quinn JB, Smith DT, Giuseppetti AA, Eichmiller FC. Effect of different whiskers on the reinforcement of dental resin composites. Dent Mater. 2003;19:359–367
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendt SL, Leinfelder KF. The clinical evaluation of heat-treated composite resin inlays. J Am Dent Assoc. 1990;120:177–181
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Loza-Herrero MA, Rueggeberg FA, Caughman WF, Schuster GS, Lefebvre CA, Gardner FM. Effect of heating delay on conversion and strength of a post-cured resin composite. J Dent Res. 1998;77:426–431
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hejazi AAE, Watts DC. Creep and visco-elastic recovery of cured and secondary-cured composites and resin-modified glass ionomers. Dent Mater. 1999;15:138–143
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zandinejad AA, Atai M, Pahlevan A. The effect of ceramic and porous fillers on the mechanical properties of experimental dental composites. Dent Mater. 2006;22:382–387
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilder AD Jr, Bayne SC, Heymann HO. Long-term clinical performance of direct posterior composites. Trans Acad Dent Mater. 1996;9:151–169
   Google Scholar
• Xu HH. Dental composite resins containing silica-fusedceramic single-crystalline whiskers with various filler levels. J Dent Res. 1999;78:1304–1311
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen MH, Chen CR, Hsu SH, Sun SP, Su WF. Low shrinkage light curable nanocomposite for dental restorative material. Dent Mater. 2006;22:138–145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moorthy A, Hogg CH, Dowling AH, Grufferty BF, Benetti AR, Fleming GJ. Cuspal deflection and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with bulk-fill flowable resin-based composite base materials. J Dent. 2012;40:500–505
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campos EA, Ardu S, Lefever D, Jassé FF, Bortolotto T, Krejci I. Marginal adaptation of Class II cavities restored with bulk-fill composites. J Dent. 2014;42:575–581
   Google Scholar
• Magne P, Knezevic A. Thickness of CAD–CAM composite resin overlays influences fatigue resistance of endodontically treated premolars. Dent Mater. 2009;25:1264–1268
   Google Scholar
• Garoushi S, Säilynoja E, Vallittu PK, Lassila L. Physical properties and depth of cure of a new short fiber reinforced composite. Dent Mater. 2013;29:835–841
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garoushi S, Vallittu PK, Lassila LVJ. Short glass fiber reinforced restorative composite resin with semi-interpenetrating polymer network matrix. Dent Mater. 2007;23:1356–1362
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garoushi S, Vallittu PK, Watts DC, Lassila LVJ. Polymerization shrinkage of experimental short glass fiber reinforced composite with semi-inter penetrating polymer network matrix. Dent Mater. 2008;24:211–215
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallesen U, Qvist V. Composite resin fillings and inlays: an 11-year evaluation. Clin Oral Invest. 2003;7:71–79
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wassell RW, Walls AWG, McCabe JF. Direct composite inlays versus conventional composite restorations: 5-year follow-up. J Dent. 2000;28:375–382
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tezvergil A, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK. The effect of fiber orientation on the polymerization shrinkage strain of fiber-reinforced composites. Dent Mater. 2006;22:610–616
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Ende A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL, Poitevin A, Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B. Bulk-filling of high C-factor posterior cavities: effect on adhesion to cavity-bottom dentin. Dental Mater. 2013;29:269–277
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garoushi S, Vallittu P, Lassila L. Depth of cure and surface microhardness of experimental short fiber-reinforced composite. Acta Odontol Scand. 2008;66:38–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goracci C, Cadenaro M, Fontanive L, Giangrosso G, Juloski J, Vichi A, Ferrari M. Polymerization efficiency and flexural strength of low-stress restorative composites. Dent Mater. 2014;30:688–694
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heintze SD. Systematic reviews: I. The correlation between laboratory tests on marginal quality and bond strength. II. The correlation between marginal quality and clinical outcome. J Adhes Dent. 2007;9:77–106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst CP, Galler P, Willershausen B, Haller B. Marginal integrity of class V restorations: SEM versus dye penetration. Dent Mater. 2008;24:319–327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scotti N, Comba A, Gambino A, Paolino DS, Alovisi M, Pasqualini D, Berutti E. Microleakage at enamel and dentin margins with a bulk fills flowable resin. Eur J Dent. 2014;8:1–8
   Google Scholar
• Magne P, Knezevic A. Simulated fatigue resistance of composite resin versus porcelain CAD/CAM overlay restorations on endodontically treated molars. Quintessence Int. 2009;40:125–133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garoushi S, Lassila LVJ, Tezvergil A, Vallittu PK. Load bearing capacity of fiber-reinforced and particulate filler composite resin combination. J Dent. 2006;34:179–184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garoushi S, Lassila LV, Tezvergil A, Vallittu PK. Static and fatigue compression test for particulate filler composite resin with fiber-reinforced composite substructure. Dent Mater. 2007;23:17–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stipho HD. Effect of glass fiber reinforcement on some mechanical properties of autopolymerizing polymethyl methacrylate. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;79:580–584
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fráter M, Forster A, Keresztúri M, Braunitzer G, Nagy K. In vitro fracture resistance of molar teeth restored with a short fibre-reinforced composite material. J Dent. 2014;42:1143–1145
   Google Scholar