Deconvolution of the particle size distribution of ProRoot MTA and MTA Angelus

References

• Parirokh M, Torabinejad M. Mineral trioxide aggregate: a comprehensive literature review – part I: chemical, physical, and antibacterial properties. J Endod. 2010;36:16–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torabinejad M, Parirokh M. Mineral trioxide aggregate: a comprehensive literature review – part II: leakage and biocompatibility investigations. J Endod. 2010;36:190–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parirokh M, Torabinejad M. Mineral trioxide aggregate: a comprehensive literature review – part III: clinical applications, drawbacks, and mechanism of action. J Endod. 2010;36:400–413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torabinejad J, White DJ. Inventors; tooth filling material and method of use. US patent publication US 5,415,547. 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Saghiri MA, Gutmann JL, Orangi J, et al. Radiopacifier particle size impacts the physical properties of tricalcium silicate-based cements. J Endod. 2015;41:225–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grazziotin-Soares R, Nekoofar MH, Davies TE, et al. Effect of bismuth oxide on white mineral trioxide aggregate: chemical characterization and physical properties. Int Endod J. 2014;47:520–533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiang TY, Ding SJ. Comparative physicochemical and biocompatible properties of radiopaque dicalcium silicate cement and mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod. 2010;36:1683–1687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camilleri J. Evaluation of the physical properties of an endodontic Portland cement incorporating alternative radiopacifiers used as root-end filling material. Int Endod J. 2010;43:231–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hungaro Duarte MA, Minotti PG, Rodrigues CT, et al. Effect of different radiopacifying agents on the physicochemical properties of white Portland cement and white mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod. 2012;38:394–397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Formosa LM, Mallia B, Camilleri J. The effect of curing conditions on the physical properties of tricalcium silicate cement for use as a dental biomaterial. Int Endod J. 2012;45:326–336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coomaraswamy KS, Lumley PJ, Hofmann MP. Effect of bismuth oxide radioopacifier content on the material properties of an endodontic portland cement-based (MTA-like) system. J Endod. 2007;33:295–298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camilleri J. The physical properties of accelerated Portland cement for endodontic use. Int Endod J. 2008;41:151–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Min KS, Chang HS, Bae JM, et al. The induction of heme oxygenase-1 modulates bismuth oxide-induced cytotoxicity in human dental pulp cells. J Endod. 2007;33:1342–1346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen CC, Ho CC, David Chen CH, Ding SJ. Physicochemical properties of calcium silicate cements for endodontic treatment. J Endod. 2009;35:1288–1291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentz DP, Garboczi EJ, Haecker CJ, Jensen OM. Effects of cement particle size distribution on performance properties of portland cement-based materials. Cem Concr Res. 1999;29:1663–1671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishnoi S. Vector modelling of hydrating cement microstructure and kinetics [PhD thesis]. Tokyo: University of Tokyo 2008; [cited 2013 Jan 30]. Available from: http://web.iitd.ac.in/∼bishnoi/files/ShashankBishnoiPhDThesis.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ha WN, Kahler B, Walsh LJ. Particle size changes in unsealed mineral trioxide aggregate powder. J Endod. 2014;40:423–426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wedd MW. Determination of particle size distributions using laser diffraction. Educ Reso Part Techn. 2003;4:1–4.
   Google Scholar
• SelectScience. Malvern Mastersizer: Malvern Instruments [Internet]. 2013; [cited 2013 Jan 31]. Available from: http://www.selectscience.net/products/mastersizer-microplus/?prodID=9785.
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. Particle size analysis – laser diffraction methods. International Standard; ISO 13320:2009. Geneva: ISO; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Komabayashi T, Spangberg LS. Comparative analysis of the particle size and shape of commercially available mineral trioxide aggregates and Portland cement: a study with a flow particle image analyzer. J Endod. 2008;34:94–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ha WN, Bentz DP, Kahler B, Walsh LJ. D90: the strongest contributor to setting time in mineral trioxide aggregate and Portland cement. J Endod. 2015;41:1146–1150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luketic SF, Malcic A, Jukic S, et al. Coronal microleakage of two root-end filling materials using a polymicrobial marker. J Endod. 2008;34:201–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Hezaimi K, Naghshbandi J, Oglesby S, et al. Human saliva penetration of root canals obturated with two types of mineral trioxide aggregate cements. J Endod. 2005;31:453–456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginebra MP, Albuixech L, Fernandez-Barragan E, et al. Mechanical performance of acrylic bone cements containing different radiopacifying agents. Biomaterials. 2002;23:1873–1882.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell W, Bridget Matthews J, Stone MH, et al. Comparison of the response of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells to challenge with particles of three bone cements in vitro. Biomaterials. 2003;24:737–748.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar