REFERENCES
- Ritter RW, Eckel FM, Olsen JL, flak 1–1. The assessment of vendors of multisource drug products by the pharmacist. Chapel Hill, NC: North Carolina Pharmaceutical Research Foundation, 1979.
- Anon. On what basis do pharmacists purchase one generic product com-pared with others? Pharm Times 1985;(0463–5.
- Long CW. Group purchasing: case reports. Hospital Corporation of America. Am J Hosp Pharm 1987;44:2501–3.
- Herrick JD. Group purchasing: vendor selection. Am I Hosp Pharm 1987;44:2035–40.
- Kroll DJ, Herrick JD, Ashby DM. Group purchasing: case reports. Amer-ican Healthcare Systems. Am J Hosp Pharm 1987;44:2493–5.
- Bass FM, Wilkie WL. A comparative analysis of attitudinal predictions of brand preference. I Market Res 1973;10(Aug):262–9.
- Pessemier EA. Multi-attribute models for predicting individual preference and choice. West Lafayette, IN: Institute for Research in the Behavioral, Eco-nomic and Management Sciences, Krannert Graduate School of Industrial Admin-istration, Purdue University, 1972, no. 346.
- Green PE, Wind Y. Multiattribute decisions in marketing: a measurement approach. Hinsdale, IL: Dryden Press, 1972.
- Lutz RI, Bettman JR. Multiattribute models in marketing: a bicentennial review. In: Woodside AG, Sheth JN, Bennet PD, eds. Consumer and industrial buying behavior. New York: North-Holland, 1977:137–49.
- Wilkie WL, Pessemier EA. Issues in marketing's use of multi-attribute attitude models. West Lafayette, EN; Institute for Research in the Behavioral, Economic and Management Sciences, Krannert Graduate School of Industrial Ad-ministration, Purdue University, 1973, no. 377.
- Alpert MI. Unresolved issues in identification of determinant attributes. In: Olson JC, ed. Advances in consumer research. vol. 7. Urbana, IL: Association for Consumer Research, 1980:83–8.
- Bass FW, Talarzyk W. An attitude model for the study of brand prefer-ence. J Market 1972;9(Feb):93–6.
- Sheth IN, Talarzyk W. Perceived instrumentality and value importance as determinants of attitudes. J Market Res 1972:9(Feb):6–9.
- Beckwith NE, Lehmann DR. The importance of differential weights in multiple attribute models of consumer attitude. I Market Res 1973:10(May):141–5.
- Holbrook M, Hulbert J. Multi-attribute models: a comparative analysis. Unpublished.
- Day G. Evaluating models of attitudinal structure. J Market Res 1972:9(Aug):279–86.
- Myers J, Alpert M. Semantic confusion in attitude research: salience vs. importance vs. determinance. In: Perreault WD Jr, ed. Advances in consumer research. Atlanta, GA: Association for Consumer Research, 1977:106–10.
- Myers JH, Alpert MI. Determinant buying attitudes: meaning and mea-surement. J Market 1968;32(0c0:13–20.
- Anderson TW Jr, Cox EP III, Fulcher DG. Bank selection decisions and market segmentation. J Market 1976;40(Jan):40–5.
- Berkowitz UW, Ginter JL, Talarzyk WW. An investigation of alternative indicators of attribute saliency and their effects on size of the attribute set in the multi-attribute model. American Marketing Association Proceedings, 1979.
- Alpert MI. Identification of determinant attributes: a comparison of meth-ods..I Market Res 1971;7(May):184–91.
- Moriarty RT Jr, Spekman RE. An empirical investigation of the informa-tion sources used during the industrial buying process. J Market Res 1984;21(May):137–47.
- Myers J, Guttman J. Validating multi-attribute attitude models. American Marketing Association Proceedings, 1974:95–9.
- Anon. The Hayes independent druggist guide. 1987–1988 ed. Newport Beach, CA: Edward N. Hayes.
- Walters MJ, Wallace FL Lessons from nonresponse in a consumer market survey. J Healthcare Market 1985;5(417–28.
- Samuels ML. Statistics for life sciences. San Francisco, CA: Dellen Pub-lishing Company, 1989.