2
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Mailed Surveys to Physicians

The Effect of Incentives and Length on the Return Rate

Pages 107-121 | Published online: 04 Dec 2011

REFERENCES

  • Coleman LG. Researchers say nonresponse is the biggest problem. Mar-ket News 1991;25:32–3.
  • Lockhart DC. New directions in program evaluation 21: making effective use of mailed questionnaires. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1984.
  • Baumgartner RM, Heberlein TA. Recent research on mailed questionnaire response rates. In: Lockhart DC, ed. New directions in program evaluation 21: making effective use of mailed questionnaires. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1984.
  • Lockhart DC, Russo JR. The effect of length of questionnaire and type of follow-up on the return rate of a mailed questionnaire. Proceedings of Evaluation 81, a joint meeting of the Evaluation Network and the Evaluation Research Soci-ety, Austin, TX, 1981.
  • Heberlein TA, Baumgartner RM. Factors affecting response rates to mailed questionnaires: a quantitative analysis of the published literature. Am So-ciol Rev 1978;43:447–62.
  • Yu J, Cooper H. A quantitative review of research design effects on re-sponse rates to questionnaires. J Market Res 1983;20:36–44.
  • Goyder JC. Further evidence on factors affecting response rates to mailed questionnaires. Am Sociol Rev 1982;47:550–3.
  • Eichner K, Habermehl W. Predicting response rates to mailed question-naires. Am Sociol Rev 1981;46:361–3.
  • Kanuk L, Berenson C. Mail survey response rates: a literature review. .1 Market Res 1975;12:440–53.
  • James JM, Bolstein R. Monetary incentives and follow-up mailings. Pub Opinion Q 1990;54:346–61.
  • Klein EV. Beyond readership— how physicians view media they receive. Med Market Media 1990;25:68–72.
  • Sobal J, DeForge BR, Ferentz KS, Muncie HL, Valente CM, Levine DM. Physician responses to multiple questionnaire mailings. Evaluation Rev 1990;14:711–22.
  • Leslie L. Are high response rates essential to valid surveys? Soc Sci Res 1972;1:323–34.
  • Senf Hi. The option to refuse: a tool for understanding non-response in mailed surveys. Evaluation Rev 1987;11:775–81.
  • Robertson MT, Sundstrom E. Questionnaire design, return rates, and re-sponse favorableness in an employee attitude questionnaire. J Appl Psychol 1990;73:354–7.
  • Tedeschi IT, Lindscold S. Social psychology. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1976.
  • Berdie DR. Reassessing the value of high response rates to mail surveys. Market Res 1989;(Sept):52–62.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.