References
- McEnally MR, Hawes JM. The market for generic brand grocery products: a review and extension.] Market 1984;48(Winter):75–83.
- Mandese 2. Who are the targets? Market & Media Decisions 1989;74(July):29–34.
- Neiman J. The encounter for over-the-counter. Adweek's Market Week 1988,24(46):20–3.
- Carroll NV, Siridhara C, Fincham JE. Factors affecting consumer accep-tance of generic drug products: an examination of inherent risk, price and maxi-mum allowable cost coverage. Akron Bus Econ Rev 1987;18(Spr):11–8.
- Bloch PS, Sherrill DL, Ridgeway NM. Consumer search: an extended framework. I Consumer Res 1986;13:119–26.
- Assael H, Kamins MA. Effects of appeal type and involvement on product disconftrmation. I Acad Market Sci 1989;17(Summer):197–208.
- Belonax It Jr, Javalgi RG. The influence of involvement and product class quality on consumer choice sets. I Acad Marlcet Sri 1989;17(Surnmer):209–16.
- Merline 1W. What's wrong with genetic drugs. Consumer Rep 1989;12: 11–7.
- Cunningham IC, Hardy AP, lmperia G. Generic brands versus national brands and store brands. J Advertis R. 1982;22(Oct):25–32.
- Syzmanslci DM, Busch PS. Identifying the generics-prone consumer: a meta-analysis. J Market Res 1987;24,425–31.
- Rao AR, Monroe KB. The effect of price, brand name, and store name on buyers' perceptions of product quality: an integrative review. J Market Res 1989;26(Aug):35–57.
- Wu BTW, Holmes 1H, Alexander IL Risk taking: its effect on selection of branded and generic grocery items. Akron Bus Econ Rev 1984;(Fall):12–6.
- Hawes 3M, Kiser GE. Using psychographics to identify the generic-prone grocery shopper. Akron Bus Econ Rev 1980; 11(Fall):7–12.
- Kona K. Psychographic profile generic buyers. In: Murphy PE, et al., eds. 1983 AMA educators' proceedings. Chicago: American Marketing Associa-tion:11–5.
- Wilkes RE, Valencia H. A note on generic purchaser generalizations and subcultural variations. J Market 1985;49(Summer):114–20.
- Anvik L, Ashton D. A profile of intentions groups for generic branded gro-cery products. In: Gitlow HS, Wheatley EW, eds. Developments in marketing sci-ence, 2. Coral Gables, FL: Academy of Marketing Science, 1976,1–4.
- Bellizzi JA, Krueckeberg HF, Hamilton IR, Martin WS. Consumer percep-tions of national, private and generic brands. J Retail 1981;57(Winter):56–70.
- Strang RA, Hon-is BF, Hernandez AL. Consumer trial of generic products in supermarkets: an exploratory study. In: Beckwith N, et al., eds. 1979 AMA educators' conference proceedings. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 1979.
- Park CW, Smith DC. Product-level choice: a top-down or bottom-up pro-cess? 1 Consumer Res 1989;16: 289–99.
- Alreck PL, Settle RB. The survey research handbook. Homewood, IL: Ir-win, 1985.
- Calder B.1, Phillips LW, Tybout AM. The concept of external validity. J Consumer R. 1982;9:240–4.
- Zaichkowsky JL. Measuring the involvement construct S Consumer Res 1985;12:341–51.
- Churchill GA Jr. A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. J Market Res 1979;16:64–73.
- Peter JP. Construct validity: a review of basic issues and marketing practic-es. S Market Res 1981;18:133–45.
- Callen RB. The scree test for the number of factors. S Multivariate Behav Res 1966;1:245–76.
- Stewart DW. The application and misapplication of factor analysis in mar-keting research. S Market Res 1981;18(Feb):51–62.
- Kaiser 1-1E, Rice J. Little Jiffy Mark IV. Educ Psycho] Measure 1974;34(Spr):111–7.
- Cronback LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psycho-metrika 1951;16:297–334.
- Hawes JM. Retailing strategies for generic brand grocery products. Ares Arbor, MI: UMI Research Press, 1982.
- Darden WR, Perreault WD. A multivariate analysis of media exposure and vacation behavior with life style covariates. 3 Consumer Res 1975;2:93–103.
- Hair JP Jr, Anderson RE, Tatham RL. Multivariate data analysis. 2nd ed. New Ymic: Macmillan Publishing, 1987.