References
- Ratcliff RA, McKoon G. Memory models, test processing, and cue-dependent retrieval. In: Varieties of memory and consciousness. Roediger HL, Craik FIM, eds. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1989.
- Reisberg D. Cognition: exploring the science of the mind. New York: W. W. Norton Co., 1997.
- Anderson JR. Cognitive psychology and its implications. 3rd ed. New York: W. H. Freeman & Co., 1990.
- Baddeley AD. Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986.
- McClelland JL, Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE. The appeal of parallel distributed processing. In: Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Rumelhart DE, McClelland JL, eds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books, 1986.
- Stein BS, Bransford JD. Constraints on effective elaboration: Effects of preci-sion and subject generation. J Verbal Learning Verbal Behav 1979;18:769–77.
- Postman L. Transfer, interference, and forgetting. In: Experimental psycholo-gy. Kling LW, Riggs LA, eds. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, 1964.
- Nelson TO. Reinforcement and human memory. In: Handbook of learning and cognitive processes. Vol. 3. Estes WK, ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1976.
- DiVesta FJ, Gray GS. Listening and notetaking. J Educ Psychol 1972;63: 8–14.
- Kiewra KA. Investigating notetaking and review: a depth of processing alter-native. Educ Psychol 1985;20(1):23–32.
- Kiewra KA. Notetaking and review: the research and its implications. Instr Sci 1987;16:233–49.
- Crawford CC. The correlation between lecture notes and quiz papers. J Educ Res 1925;12:379–86.
- Locke EA. An empirical study of lecture notetaking among college students. J Educ Res 1977;77:93–9.
- Anderson TH, Armbruster BB. The value of taking notes during lectures. Cen-ter for the Study of Reading. Technical Report No. 374. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1986.
- Kiewra KA, Fletcher HJ. The relationship between levels of notetaking and achievement. Hum Learning 1984;3:273–80.
- Rickards JP, Friedman E The encoding versus the external storage hypothesis in note taking. Contemp Educ Psychol 1978;3:136–43.
- Beecher J. Note-taking: what do we know about the benefits? ERIC Digest 1988;12:2–3.
- Kiewra KA. Learning from a lecture: an investigation of notetaking, review, and attendance at a lecture. Hum Learning 1985;4:73–7.
- Kiewra KA. Students' note-taking behaviors and the efficacy of providing the instructor's notes for review. Contemp Educ Psychol 1985;10:378–86.
- Hartley J. Lecture handouts and student note-taking. Programmed Learning Educ Technol 1976;13:58–67.
- Kiewra KA, DuBois NF, Christian D, McShane A, Meyerhoffer M, Roskelley D. Note-taking functions and techniques. J Educ Psychol 1991;83:240–5.
- Kiewra KA, DuBois NF, Christian D, McShane A. Providing study notes: comparison of three types of notes for review. J Educ Psychol 1988;80:595–7.
- Kiewra KA, Benton SL, Kim S, Risch N, Christensen M. Effects of note-tak-ing format and study technique on recall and relational performance. Contemp Educ Psychol 1995;20:172–87.
- Pauk W. How to study in college. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1984.
- Currid C. Make your point Rocklin, CA: Prima Publishing, 1995.
- Gaulke S. 101 ways to captivate a business audience. New York: AMACOM, American Management Association, 1997.
- Kosslyn SM. Ghosts in the mind's machine: creating and using images in the brain. New York: Norton, 1983.