Test Anxiety with Respect to a Comprehensive Cumulative Assessment

REFERENCES

• A Guide for Doctor of Pharmacy Program Assessment. AACP. 2000. httplIwww. aorp.org/Docs/MainNavigation/Resources/5416_pharmacyprogramassessmentiorweb.pdf (accessed on May 10th, 2004).
   Google Scholar
• Bouldin AS, Wilkin NE. Programmatic Assessment in U.S. schools and col-leges of pharmacy: A snapshot. Am J Pharm Educ. 2000;64(4):380–387.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan GJ, Nykamp D. Use of cumulative examinations at U.S. schools of phar-macy. Am J Pharm Educ. 2000;64(4):409–413.
   Google Scholar
• Latiff DA, Stull R. Relationship between an annual examination to assess stu-dent knowledge and traditional measures of academic performance. Am J Pharm Educ. 2001;65:346–349.
   Google Scholar
• Angoff WH. Scales, norms, and equivalent scores. In R. C. Thomdike (Ed.), Ed-ucational Measurement (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Council on Education; 1971.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald AS. The prevalence and effects of test anxiety in school children. Educational Psychology. 2001 ;21(1): 89–98.
   Google Scholar
• Sieber JE. Defining test anxiety: Problems and approaches. In IG Sarason (Ed.), Test Anxiety: Theory, Research and Applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates. 1980;15–40.
   Google Scholar
• http://www.utdallas.edu/student/slife/counseling/testanx.html (accessed on Jun 14th, 2004).
   Google Scholar
• Morris LW, Davis MA, & Hutchings CH. Cognitive and emotional components of anxiety: Literature review and a revised worry-emotionality scale. Journal of Edu-cational Psychology. 1981;73:541–555.
   Google Scholar
• Musch J and Broder A. Test anxiety versus academic skills: A comparison of two alternative models for predicting performance in a statistics exam. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 1999;69:105–116.
   Google Scholar
• Van Der Ploeg HM. Worry, emotionality, intelligence and academic perfor-mance in male and female Dutch secondary school children. In Van Der Ploeg HM, R Schwarzer,, CD Spielberger (Eds.), Advances in Test Anxiety Research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates. 1984;3:201–210.
   Google Scholar
• Wine JD. Cognitive-attentional theory of test anxiety. In IG Sarason (Ed.), Test Anxiety: Theory, Research, and Applications, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 1980;349–385.
   Google Scholar
• Sarason, IG. Anxiety, self-preoccupation and attention. Anxiety Research. 1988;1:3–8.
   Google Scholar
• Tobias S. Test anxiety: Interference defective skills and cognitive capacity. Ed-ucational Psychologist. 1985;20:135–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seipp B. Anxiety and academic performance: A meta-analysis of findings. Anx-iety Research. 1991;4:27–41.
   Google Scholar
• Sarason IG. Experimental approaches to test anxiety: Attention and the uses of information. In Spielberger CD (Ed.), Anxiety: Current Trends in Theory and Re-search. New York: Academic Press. 1972;381–403.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock DR. Effects of test anxiety and evaluative threat on students' achieve-ment and motivation. The Journal of Educational Research. 2001;94(5):284–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aysan F, Thompson D & Hamarat E. Test anxiety, coping strategies, and per-ceived health in a group of high school students: A Turkish sample. The Journal of Ge-netic Psychology. 2001;162(4):402–411.
   Google Scholar
• Cassady JC. The impact of cognitive test anxiety on test comprehension and re-call in the absence of external evaluative pressure. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 2004;18:311–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naveh-Benjamin M, McKeachie WJ, Lin Y. Two types of test-anxious stu-dents: Support for an Information Processing Model. Journal of Educational Psychol-ogy. 1987;79:131–136.
   Google Scholar
• Kleijn WC, Van Der Ploeg HM, Topman RM. Cognition, study habits, test anxi-ety and academic performance. Psychological Reports. 1994;75:1219–1226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs G, Simpson C. How Assessment Influences Student Learning-A Con-ceptual Overview. Student Support Research Group, Center for Higher Education Practice, Open University. http://cehep.open.ac.uk/cehep/ssrg/reports/documents/42_02.pdf (ac-cessed on Feb. 1st, 2004).
   Google Scholar
• Ross ME, Salisbury-Glennon JD, Guarino A, Reed CJ, Marshall M. Situated self-regulation: Modeling the interrelationships among instruction, assessment, learn-ing strategies and academic performance. Educational Research and Evaluation. 2003;9(2): 189–209.
   Google Scholar
• Lizzio A, Wilson K, Simons R. University students' perceptions of the learning environment and academic outcomes: Implications for theory and practice. Studies in Higher Educ. 2002;27(1):29–52.
   Google Scholar
• Gettinger M, Seiber JK. Contributions of study skills to academic competence. School Psychology Review. 2002;31(3):350–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming VM. Improving students' exam performance by introducing study strategies and goal setting. Teaching of Psychology. 2002;29(2):115–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paris Scott G., Roth Jodie L., Turner Julianne C. Developing disillusionment: Students' perceptions of academic achievement tests. Issues in Education. 2000; 6(1/2):17–46.
   Google Scholar
• Lay C, Schouwenburg H. Trait procrastination, time management and academic behavior. J Soc Behav Pers. 1993;84:647–662.
   Google Scholar
• Krischenbaum DS, Perrie MG. Improving academic competence in adults: A review of recent research. J Couns Psychol. 1982;29:76–94.
   Google Scholar
• Kerlinger FN, Lee HB. Foundations of Behavioral Research, 4th ed. USA: Wadsworth Thompson Learning. 2000:662–3.
   Google Scholar
• Henning K, Sydney E, Shaw D. Perfectionism, the imposter phenomenon and psychological adjustment in medical, dental, nursing and pharmacy students. Medical Education. 1998;32:456–464.
   Google Scholar
• Topman R.M., Klienj W., Ploeg H. and Masset E. Test Anxiety, cognitions, study habits and academic performance: A prospective study. Advances in Test Anxiety Research. 1992;7:221–241.
   Google Scholar
• Waterworth S. Time management strategies in nursing practice. Journal of Ad-vances Nursing. 2003;43(5),432–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar