27
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Validity and reliability of a revised Japanese version of the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales version 2 (AIMS2)

, , , , , , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 247-255 | Received 15 May 2000, Accepted 01 Sep 2000, Published online: 02 Jan 2014

References

  • Meenan FtF, Gertman PM, Mason JH. Measuring health in arthritis: the arthritis impact measurement scales. Arthritis Rheum 1980;23:146–52.
  • Meenan FtF, Gertman PM, Mason JH, Funaif R. The arthritis impact measurement scales: further investigations of a health status measure. Arthritis Rheum 1982;25:1048–53.
  • Taal E, Jacobs JW, Seydel ER, Wiegman O, Rasker JJ. Evaluation of the Dutch arthritis impact measurement scales (Dutch AIMS) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Ftheumatol 1989;28:487–91.
  • Samplis JS, Pouchot J, Beaudet F, Carette S, Gutkowski A, Harth M, et al. Arthritis impact measurement scales: reliability of a French version and validity in adult Still's disease. J Ftheumatol 1990;17:1657–61.
  • Bijsma J, Huiskes C, Kraaimaat FW, Vanderveen MJ, Huber-Bruning O. Relation between patients' own health assessment and clinical and laboratory findings in rheumatoid arthritis. J Ftheumatol 1991;18:650–3.
  • Fitzpatric R. The measurement of health status and quality of life in rheumatoid arthritis. Bailliere's Clin Ftheumato11993;7:297–317.
  • Abello-Banfi M, Cardiel MH, Ruiz-Mercado R, Alarcon-Segovia D. Quality of life in rheumatoid arthritis: validation of a Spanish version of the arthritis impact measurement scales (Spanish AIMS). J Ftheumatol 1994;21:1250–5.
  • Archenholz B, Bjelle A. Evaluation of a Swedish version of the arthritis impact measurement scales (AIMS). Scand J Ftheumatol 1995;24:64–8.
  • Meenan FtF, Mason JH, Anderson JJ, Guccione AA, Kazis LE. AIMS2: the content and properties of a revised and expanded arthritis impact measurement scales health status questionnaire. Arthritis Rheum 1992;35: 1–10.
  • Ftiemsma RP, Taal E, Rasker JJ, Houtman PM, van Paassen HC, Wiegman O. Evaluation of a Dutch version of the AIMS2 for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Ftheumatol 1996;35:755–60.
  • Archenholz B, Bjelle A. Reliability, validity, and sensitivity of a Swedish version of the revised and expanded arthritis impact measurement scales (AIMS2). J Ftheumatol 1997;24:1370–7.
  • Hashimoto A, Sato H, Kondo H, Ishihara Y, Akizuki M, Kutsuna T, et al. Results of the QOL study in RA patients with the Japanese AIMS2 and the questionnaires developed by the QOL research group (in Japanese). In: Ministry of Health and Welfare. Report of the grant study on chronic diseases, rheumatoid arthritis 1992–1993. Tokyo: Ministry of Health and Welfare; 1993. pp. 235–42.
  • Hashimoto A, Sato H, Kondo H, Ishihara Y, Akizuki M, Kutsuna T, et al. Development and reliability of the revised Japanese AIMS2 (in Japanese). In: Ministry of Health and Welfare. Report of the grant study on chronic diseases, rheumatoid arthritis 1993–1994. Tokyo: Ministry of Health and Welfare; 1994. pp. 184–7.
  • Sato H, Araki S, Hashimoto A, Kondo H, Ishihara Y, Akizuki M, et al. The validity and reliability of a Japanese version of arthritis impact measurement scales in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (in Japanese). Ryumachi (J Jpn College Rheumatol) 1995;35:566–74.
  • Kelley WN, Harris ED, Ruddy S, Sledge CB. Textbook of rheuma-tology. 2nd ed. Vol 1. Philadelphia (PA): WB Saunders; 1985. pp. 914–48.
  • Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrica 1951;16:297–334.
  • Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psycho Bull 1979;86:420–8.
  • Donoghue JR, Collins LM. A note on the unbiased estimation of the intraclass correlation. Psychometrica 1990;55:159–64.
  • Rae G. The equivalence of multiple rater kappa statistics and intraclass correlation coefficients. Educ Psychol Measure 1988;48:367–74.
  • Stata Corporation. Stata Statistical Software: release 6.0. College Station (TX): Stata Corporation; 1999.
  • Coulton CJ, Hyduk CM, Chow JC. An assessment of the arthritis impact measurement scales in 3 ethnic groups. J Ftheumatol 1989;16: 1110–5.
  • Pollock SE, Christian BJ, Sands D. Responses to chronic illness: analysis of psychological and physiological adaptation. Nurs Res 1990;39:300–4.
  • Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159–74.
  • Potts MK, Brandt KD. Evidence of the validity of the arthritis impact measurement scales. Arthritis Rheum 1987;30:93–6.
  • Fifield J, Reisine ST, Grady K. Work disability and the experience of pain and depression in rheumatoid arthritis. Soc Sci Med 1991;33:579–85.
  • Ravenson TA, Felton BJ. Disability and coping as predictors of psychological adjustment to rheumatoid arthritis. J Consult Clin Psychol 1989;57:344–8.
  • Clough DH. The effects of cognitive distortion and depression on disability in rheumatoid arthritis. Res Nurs Health 1991;14:439–46.
  • Ravenson TA, Schiaffino KM, Majerovitz SD, Gibofsky A. Social support as a double-edged sword. Soc Sci Med 1992;33:807–13.
  • Krol B, Sanderman R, Suurmeijer T. Social support, rheumatoid arthritis and quality of life: concepts, measurement and research. Patient Educ Couns 1993;20:101–20.
  • Walsh WB, Betz NE. Tests and assessment. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice Hall; 1985. pp. 46–73.
  • Fowler FJ. Improving survey questions: design and evaluation. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 1995. pp. 138–55.
  • Ishihara Y, Konno T, Hiki K. Effects of rehabilitation in rheumatoid arthritis (in Japanese). In: Ministry of Health and Welfare. Report of the grant study on chronic diseases, rheumatoid arthritis 1993–1994. Tokyo: Ministry of Health and Welfare; 1994. pp. 198–200.
  • Kutsuna T. Study on the QOL among RA patients (in Japanese). In: Ministry of Health and Welfare. Report of the grant study on chronic diseases, rheumatoid arthritis 1992–1993. Tokyo: Ministry of Health and Welfare; 1993. pp. 252–4.
  • Sato H, Hashimoto A, Kondo H, Ishihara Y, Akizuki M, Kutsuna T, et al. Assessment of the Japanese AIMS2 with the relation-ships between the AIMS2 scores and various laboratory tests (in Japanese). In: Ministry of Health and Welfare. Report of the grant study on chronic diseases, rheumatoid arthritis 1993–1994. Tokyo: Ministry of Health and Welfare; 1994. pp. 179–83.
  • Blalock SJ, Vellis BM, Vellis FtF, Sauter SH. Self-evaluation processes and adjustment to rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1988;31:1245–51.
  • Lankveld W, Naring G, Staak C, Bosch PP, Putte L. Stress caused by rheumatoid arthritis: relation among subjective stressors of the disease, disease status and well-being. J Behav Med 1993;16:309–21.
  • Sato H, Araki S, Hashimoto A, Moroi Y, Kondo H, Ishihara Y, et al. Quality of life, subjective health status and health and life satisfaction in rheumatoid arthritis (in Japanese). Jpn J Pub Health 1995;42:743–54.
  • Anderson KO, Bradley LA, Young LD, McDaniel LK, Wise CM. Rheumatoid arthritis: review of psychological factors related to etiology, effects and treatment. Psychol Bull 1985;98:358–87.
  • Spiegel JS, Leake B, Spiegel TM, Paulus HE, Kane RL, Ward NB, et al. What are we measuring?: an examination of self-reported functional status measures. Arthritis Rheum 1988;31:721–8.
  • Young D. Psychological factors in rheumatoid arthritis. J Consult Clin Psychol 1992;60:619–27.
  • Fitzpatric R, Ziebland S, Jenkinson C, Mowat A, Mowat A. A comparison of the sensitivity to change of several health status instruments in rheumatoid arthritis. J Ftheumatol 1993;20:429–36.
  • Bendtsen P, Hoernquist JO. Change and status in quality of life in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Qual Life Res 1992;1:297–305.
  • Sato H, Hashimoto A, Kondo H, Ishihara Y, Akizuki M, Kutsuna T, et al. Changes in quality of life by therapeutic measures in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a preliminary report (in Japa-nese). In: Ministry of Health and Welfare. Report of the grant study on chronic diseases, rheumatoid arthritis 1994–1995. Tokyo: Ministry of Health and Welfare; 1995. pp. 179–86.
  • Ren XS, Kazis L, Meenan FtF. Short-form arthritis impact measurement scales 2: tests of reliability and validity among patients with osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res 1999;12: 163–71.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.