Development and validation of a new instrument to evaluate the ease of use of patient-controlled analgesic modalities for postoperative patients

References

• American Society of Anesthesiologists. Practical guidelines for acute pain management in the perioperative setting. Park Ridge, IL, 2003
   Google Scholar
• American Pain Society. Principles of Analgesic Use in the Treatment of Acute Pain and Cancer Pain. Glenview, IL, 2003
   Google Scholar
• American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Acute Pain Management. Practice guidelines for acute pain management in the perioperative setting. A report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Pain Management, Acute Pain Section. Anesthesiology 1995;82:1071-1081
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon DB, Dahl JL, Miaskowski C, American Pain Society recommendations for improving the quality of acute and cancer pain management: American Pain Society Quality of Care Task Force. Arch Intern Med 2005;165:1574-1580
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Pain Assessment and Management: An Organizational Approach. Oakbrook, IL: JCAHO, 2000
   Google Scholar
• Rathmell JP, Wu CL, Sinatra RS, Acute post-surgical pain management: a critical appraisal of current practice. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2006;31:1-42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolin SJ, Cashman JN, Bland JM. Effectiveness of acute postoperative pain management: I. Evidence from published data. Br J Anaesth 2002;89:409-423
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmann KA. Recent developments in patient-controlled analgesia. J Pain Symptom Manage 2005;29:S72-89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen PP, Chui PT, Ma M, Gin T. A prospective survey of patients after cessation of patient-controlled analgesia. Anesth Analg 2001;92:224-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen HH, Yeh ML, Yang HJ. Testing the impact of a multimedia video CD of patient-controlled analgesia on pain knowledge and pain relief in patients receiving surgery. Int J Med Inform 2005;74:437-445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chumbley GM, Ward L, Hall GM, Salmon P. Pre-operative information and patient-controlled analgesia: much ado about nothing. Anaesthesia 2004;59:354-358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu CL, Cohen SR, Richman JM, Efficacy of postoperative patient-controlled and continuous infusion epidural analgesia versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with opioids: a meta-analysis. Anesthesiology 2005;103:1079-1088
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu CL, Rowlingson AJ, Partin AW, Correlation of postoperative pain to quality of recovery in the immediate postoperative period. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2005;30:516-522
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bainbridge D, Martin JE, Cheng DC. Patient-controlled versus nurse-controlled analgesia after cardiac surgery – a meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth 2006;53:492-499
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sawaki Y, Parker RK, White PF. Patient and nurse evaluation of patient-controlled analgesia delivery systems for postoperative pain management. J Pain Symptom Manage 1992;7:443-453
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosati J, Gallagher M, Shook B, Evaluation of an oral patient-controlled analgesia device for pain management in oncology inpatients. J Support Oncol 2007;5:443-448
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gan TJ, Gordon DB, Bolge SC, Allen JG. Patient-controlled analgesia: patient and nurse satisfaction with intravenous delivery systems and expected satisfaction with transdermal delivery systems. Curr Med Res Opin 2007;23:2507-2516
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turk DC, Dworkin RH, Burke LB, Developing patient-reported outcome measures for pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain 2006;125:208-215
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu SS, Wu CL. The effect of analgesic technique on postoperative patient-reported outcomes including analgesia: a systematic review. Anesth Analg 2007;105:789-808
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rothman M, Vallow S, Damaraju CV, Hewitt DJ. Using the patient global assessment of the method of pain control to assess new analgesic modalities in clinical trials. Curr Med Res Opin 2009;25:1433-1443
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daut RL, Cleeland CS, Flanery RC. Development of the Wisconsin Brief Pain Questionnaire to assess pain in cancer and other diseases. Pain 1983;17:197-210
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware JE Jr., Snyder MK, Wright WR, Defining and measuring patient satisfaction with medical care. Eval Program Plann 1983;6:247-263
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988
   Google Scholar
• Mendoza TR, Chen C, Brugger A, The utility and validity of the modified brief pain inventory in a multiple-dose postoperative analgesic trial. Clin J Pain 2004;20:357-362
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendoza TR, Chen C, Brugger A, Lessons learned from a multiple-dose post-operative analgesic trial. Pain 2004;109:103-109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ochroch EA, Gottschalk A, Augoustides JG, Pain and physical function are similar following axillary, muscle-sparing vs posterolateral thoracotomy. Chest 2005;128:2664-2670
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Juniper E, Guyatt G, Jaeschke R. How to develop and validate a new health-related quality of life instrument. In: Spilker B, ed. Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven, 1996
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Guidance for Industry. Patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims. Silver Springs, MD: FDA, 2006
   Google Scholar
• Heitz JW, Witkowski TA, Viscusi ER. New and emerging analgesics and analgesic technologies for acute pain management. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2009;22:608-617
   PubMedGoogle Scholar