Cost-analysis model of colonoscopy preparation using split-dose reduced-volume oral sulfate solution (OSS) and polyethylene glycol with electrolytes solution (PEG-ELS)

References

• Hillyer GC, Basch CH, Lebwohl B, et al. Shortened surveillance intervals following suboptimal bowel preparation for colonoscopy: results of a national survey. Int J Colorectal Dis 2013;28:73-81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cost of Colorectal Cancer. Cost of illness handbook. US Environmental Protection Agency, 2007
   Google Scholar
• Gruss HJ, Crockett A, Leicester RJ. Budget-impact model for colonoscopy cost calculation and comparison between 2 litre PEG + ASC and sodium picosulphate with magnesium citrate or sodium phosphate oral bowel cleaning agents. J Med Econ 2012;15:758-65
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Luo Z, Bradley CJ, Dahman BA, et al. Colon cancer treatment costs for medicare and dually eligible beneficiaries. Health Care Financ Rev 2009;31:35-50
   Google Scholar
• Cohen LB, Kastenberg DM, Mount DB, et al. Current issues in optimal bowel preparation: excerpts from a roundtable discussion among colon-cleansing experts. Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009;5(11 Suppl 19):3-11
   Google Scholar
• Rabeneck L, Paszat LF, Saskin R, et al. Association between colonoscopy rates and colorectal cancer mortality. Am J Gastroenterol 2010;105:1627-32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazarian ES, Carreira FS, Toribara NW, et al. Colonoscopy completion in a large safety net health care system. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008;6:438-42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan AO, Lee LN, Chan AC, et al. Predictive factors for colonoscopy complications. Hong Kong Med J = Xianggang yi xue za zhi/Hong Kong Acad Med 2015;21:23-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Froehlich F, Wietlisbach V, Gonvers JJ, et al. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2005;61:378-84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rex DK, Imperiale TF, Latinovich DR, et al. Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2002;97:1696-700
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harewood GC, Sharma VK, Garmo Pd. Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc 2003;58:75-9
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Horin S, Bar-Meir S, Avidan B. The impact of colon cleanliness assessment on endoscopists' recommendations for follow-up colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2007;102:2680-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rex DK, Palma JAD, Rodriguez R, et al. A randomized clinical study comparing reduced-volume oral sulfate solution with standard 4-liter sulfate-free electrolyte lavage solution as preparation for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2010;72:328-36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tepes B, Mlakar DN, Metlicar T. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy with magnesium sulphate and low-volume polyethylene glycol. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014;26:616-20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rex DK, DiPalma JA, McGowan J, et al. A comparison of oral sulfate solution with sodium picosulfate: magnesium citrate in split doses as bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2014;80:1113-23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGowan J, Cleveland M, Rex D. Comparison of oral sulfate solution regimens to 4l PEG-ELS in adult subjects undergoing colonoscopy. Am J Gastro 2013;108:S603
   Google Scholar
• Optum Health Reporting & Insights. www.optum.com. Accessed 2014
   Google Scholar
• Mai PL, Wideroff L, Greene MH, et al. Prevalence of family history of breast, colorectal, prostate, and lung cancer in a population-based study. Public Health Genomics 2010;13:495-503
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner BJ, Weiner M, Yang C, et al. Predicting adherence to colonoscopy or flexible sigmoidoscopy on the basis of physician appointment–keeping behavior. Ann Intern Med 2004;140:528-32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denberg TD, Melhado TV, Coombes JM, et al. Predictors of nonadherence to screening colonoscopy. J Gen Intern Med 2005;20:989-95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Actuarial Life Table. Social Security Administration, 2010
   Google Scholar
• United States Census. Bureau USC, 2010
   Google Scholar
• Hookey LC, Vanner S. A review of current issues underlying colon cleansing before colonoscopy. Can J Gastroenterol 2007;21:105-11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bini EJ, Rajapaksa RC, Weinshel EH. The findings and impact of nonrehydrated guaiac examination of the rectum (FINGER) study: a comparison of 2 methods of screening for colorectal cancer in asymptomatic average-risk patients. Arch Intern Med 1999;159:2022-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cohen LB. Advances in bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2015;25:183-97
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cohen SL, Einarsson JI. The role of mechanical bowel preparation in gynecologic laparoscopy. Rev Obstet Gynecol 2011;4:28-31
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hassan C, Bretthauer M, Kaminski MF, et al. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: guideline. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE), 2013. p 142-50
   Google Scholar
• Di Palma JA, Rodriguez R, McGowan J, et al. A randomized clinical study evaluating the safety and efficacy of a new, reduced-volume, oral sulfate colon-cleansing preparation for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2009;104:2275-84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacPhail ME, Hardacker KA, Tiwari A, et al. Intraprocedural cleansing work during colonoscopy and achievable rates of adequate preparation in an open-access endoscopy unit. Gastrointest Endosc 2015;81:525-30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry SG, Ness RM, Stiles RA, et al. A cost analysis of colonoscopy using microcosting and time-and-motion techniques. J Gen Intern Med 2007;22:1415-21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar