References
- Bina , O. 2007 . A critical review of the dominant lines of argumentation on the need for strategic environmental assessment . Environmental Impact Assessment Review , 27 : 585 – 606 .
- Cashmore , M. 2004 . The role of science in environmental impact assessment: process and procedure versus purpose in the development of theory . Environmental Impact Assessment Review , 24 : 403 – 426 .
- Elling , B. 1997 . Strategic environmental assessment of national policies: the Danish experience of a full concept assessment . Project Appraisal , 12 ( 3 ) : 161 – 172 .
- Elling , B. 2000 . Integration of strategic environmental assessment into regional spatial planning . Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal , 18 ( 3 ) : 233 – 243 .
- Elling , B. 2008 . Rationality and the Environment. , London : Earthscan. .
- Fischer , F. 2000 . Citizens, Experts and the Environment. , Durham , Carolina : Duke University Press. .
- Fischer , T. B. 2003 . Strategic environmental assessments in postmodern times . Environmental Impact Assessment Review , 23 ( 2 ) : 155 – 170 .
- Flyvbjerg , B. 1998 . Rationality and Power: Democracy in Practice. , Chicago : University of Chicago Press. .
- Frantzeskaki , N. and Thissen , W. 2009 . Rationality and the environment, decision-making in environmental politics and assessment: book review . Ecological Economics , 68 ( 4 ) : 1270 – 1272 .
- Habermas , J. 1984 . The Theory of Communicative Action. , Vol. 1 , Cambridge : Polity Press. .
- Hajer , M. 1996 . “ Ecological modernisation as cultural politics ” . In Risk, Environment and Modernity , Edited by: Lash , S. and Szerszynski , B. 246 – 268 . London : Sage .
- Healey , P. 1996 . The communicative turn in spatial planning theory and its implications for spatial strategy formulation . Environmental Planning B , 23 : 217 – 234 .
- Hillier , J. 1998 . “ Representation, Identity and the communicative shaping of place ” . In The Production of Public Space. , Edited by: Light , A. and Smith , J. 207 – 232 . Maryland : Rowman & Littlefield .
- Kørnøv , L. and Thissen , W. A H . 2000 . Rationality an in decision- and policy-making: implications for strategic environmental assessment . Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal , 18 ( 3 ) : 191 – 2000 .
- Lobos , V. 2008 . Modernization, rationality and pubic participation . Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal , 26 ( 3 ) : 231 – 232 .
- Marsden , S. 1998 . Importance of context in measuring the effectiveness of strategic environmental assessment . Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal , 16 : 255 – 266 .
- Nilsson , M. and Wiklund , H. 2009 . Analytical framework and tool kit for SEA follow up . Environmental Impact Assessment Review , 29 : 186 – 199 .
- Nooteboom , S. 2007 . Impact assessment procedures for sustainable development: A complexity theory perspective . Environmental Impact Assessment Review , 27 : 645 – 665 .
- Richardson , T. 1996 . Foucauldian discourse: power and truth in urban and regional policy making . European Environmental Studies , 4 : 279 – 292 .
- Richardson , T. 2004 . “ Environmental assessment and planning theory ” . In Planning for Sustainable Development: the practice and potential of Environmental Assessment. , Edited by: Hilding-Rydevik , T. and Theod , A. H. 23 – 51 . Stockholm : NordRegio .
- Runhaar , H. 2009 . Putting SEA in context: A discourse perspective on how SEA contributes to decision-making . Environmental Impact Assessment Review , 29 : 200 – 209 .
- Runhaar , H. and Driessen , P. P J . 2007 . What makes strategic environmental assessment sucsful environmental assessment? The role of context in the contribution of SEA to decision- making . Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal , 25 ( 1 ) : 2 – 14 .
- Sager , T. 1994 . Communicative Planning Theory. , Aldershot : Avebury. .
- Söderbaum , P. 2000 . Ecological Economics - A Political Economics Approach to Environment and Development. , London : Earthscan. .
- Wallington , T. , Bina , O. and Thissen , W. 2007 . Theorising strategic environmental assessment: Fresh perspectives and future challenges . Environmental Impact Assessment Review , 27 : 569 – 584 .