5,423
Views
31
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Evaluation of the environmental impact assessment system in Egypt

Pages 193-203 | Published online: 20 Feb 2012

References

  • Abul-Azm , A. G. 1999 . EIA: the Egyptian Experience Tunisia Unpublished paper presented at the Regional EIA Workshop, METAP EIA Project
  • Ahammed , R. and Harvey , N. 2004 . Evaluation of environment impact assessment procedures and practice in Bangladesh . Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal , 22 ( 1 ) : 63 – 77 .
  • Ahmad , B. and Wood , C. 2002 . A comparative evaluation of the EIA systems in Egypt, Turkey and Tunisia . Environmental Impact Assessment Review , 22 ( 3 ) : 213 – 234 .
  • Ali , O. MM . 2007 . Policy and institutional reforms for an effective EIA system in Sudan . Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management , 9 ( 1 ) : 67 – 82 .
  • Alshuwaikhat , H. M. 2005 . Strategic environmental assessment can help solve environmental impact assessment failures in developing countries . Environmental Impact Assessment Review , 25 ( 4 ) : 307 – 317 .
  • Appiah-Opoku , S. 2001 . Environmental impact assessment in developing countries: the case of Ghana . Environmental Impact Assessment Review , 21 ( 1 ) : 59 – 71 .
  • Arab Republic of Egypt . 1995 . Law No. 4 of 1994 on the Protection of the Environment and its Executive Regulations. , Cairo : Arab Republic of Egypt (ARE). .
  • Arab Republic of Egypt . 2009 . Law No. 9 of 2009 Amendment of Law No. 4 of 1994 on the Protection of the Environment and its Executive Regulations. , Cairo : Arab Republic of Egypt (ARE). .
  • Badr , E. A. , Cashmore , M. and Cobb , D. 2004 . The consideration of impacts upon the aquatic environment in environmental impact statements in England and Wales . Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management , 6 ( 1 ) : 19 – 49 .
  • Barker , A. and Wood , C. 1999 . An evaluation of EIA system performance in eight EU countries . Environmental Impact Assessment Review , 19 ( 4 ) : 387 – 404 .
  • Bernard , H. R. 2000 . Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. , London : Sage. .
  • Bryman , A. 2004 . Social research methods. , Oxford : Oxford University Press. .
  • Cashmore , M. , Christophilopoulos , E. and Cobb , D. 2002 . An evaluation of the quality of environmental impact statements in Thessaloniki, Greece . Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management , 4 ( 4 ) : 371 – 395 .
  • EEAA . 1996 . Guideline for Egyptian environmental impact assessment principles and procedures. , Cairo : Egyptian Environmental Affairs Agency (EEAA). .
  • EEAA . 2009 . Guideline for Egyptian environmental impact assessment principles and procedures, 2nd edn. , Cairo : Egyptian Environmental Affairs Agency (EEAA). .
  • El Fadl , K. and Fadel , M. El . 2004 . Comparative assessment of EIA systems in MENA countries: challenges and prospects . Environmental Impact Assessment Review , 24 ( 6 ) : 553 – 593 .
  • ESCWA . 2001 . A Study on the Evaluation of Environmental Impact Assessment in Selected ESCWA Countries. , New York : United Nations. .
  • Fuller , K. 1999 . “ Quality and quality control in environmental impact assessment ” . In Handbook of Environmental Impact Assessment, Vol. 2. Environmental Impact Assessment in Practice: Impact and Limitations , Edited by: Petts , J. 55 – 82 . Oxford : Blackwell .
  • Glasson , J. , Therivel , R. and Chadwick , A. 2005 . Introduction to Environmental Impact Assessment. , London : Spon. .
  • Jay , S. , Jones , C. , Slinn , P. and Wood , C. 2007 . Environmental impact assessment: Retrospect and prospect . Environmental Impact Assessment Review , 27 ( 4 ) : 287 – 300 .
  • METAP . 2000 . Evaluation and Future Development of the EIA System in Egypt: A Report Prepared under the METAP EIA Institutional Strengthening Project. , Manchester : Mediterranean Environmental Technical Assistance Programme (METAP), Manchester University EIA Centre. .
  • Nadeem , O. and Hameed , R. 2008 . Evaluation of environmental impact assessment system in Pakistan . Environmental Impact Assessment Review , 28 ( 8 ) : 562 – 571 .
  • Ogunba , O. A. 2004 . EIA systems in Nigeria: evolution, current practice and shortcomings . Environmental Impact Assessment Review , 24 ( 6 ) : 643 – 660 .
  • Petts , J. 1999 . “ Public participation and environmental impact assessment ” . In Handbook of Environmental Impact Assessment, Vol. 1. Environmental Impact Assessment: Process, Methods and Potential , Edited by: Petts , J. 145 – 177 . Oxford : Blackwell .
  • Polonen , I. 2006 . Quality control and the substantive influence of environmental impact assessment in Finland . Environmental Impact Assessment Review , 26 ( 5 ) : 481 – 491 .
  • Robson , C. 2002 . Real World Research: A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner-Researchers. , Oxford : Blackwell. .
  • Sadler , B. 1996 . International Study of the Effectiveness of Environmental Assessment - Environmental Assessment in a Changing World: Evaluating Practice to Improve Performance. , Canada : International Association for Impact Assessment. .
  • Sherif , Y. , Abul-Azm , A. G. and Elailah , D. Abou . 2002 . A Proposed Approach to Assessing EIA System Performance in Egypt. , The Hague : IAIA02. .
  • Simmons , R. 2001 . “ Questionnaires ” . In Researching social life , Edited by: Gilbert , N. 85 – 104 . London : Sage .
  • Vasconcelos , C. , Hamilton , A. and Barrett , P. 2000 . Public participation in EIA: A study from a Portuguese perspective . Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management , 2 ( 4 ) : 561 – 582 .
  • Wood , C. 1999 . “ Comparative evaluation of environmental impact assessment systems ” . In Handbook of Environmental Impact Assessment, Vol. 2. Environmental Impact Assessment in Practice: Impact and Limitations , Edited by: Petts , J. 10 – 34 . Oxford : Blackwell .
  • Wood , C. 2003 . Environmental impact assessment in developing countries . International Development Planning Review , 25 ( 3 ) : 301 – 321 .
  • Zeremariam , T. K. and Quinn , N. 2007 . An evaluation of environmental impact assessment in Eritrea . Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal , 25 ( 1 ) : 53 – 63 .

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.