Quality of Environmental Impact Assessment: Finnish EISs and the opinions of EIA professionals

References

• Androulidakis , I. and Karakassis , I. 2006 . Evaluation of EIA system performance in Greece using quality indicators . Environmental Impact Assessment Review , 26 : 242 – 256 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arts , J. 1998 . EIA Follow-up. On the Role of Ex-Post Evaluation in Environmental Impact Assessment. , Groningen : GeoPress. .
   Google Scholar
• Barker , A. and Wood , C. 1999 . An evaluation of EIA system performance in eight EU countries . Environmental Impact Assessment Review , 19 : 387 – 404 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beattie , R. B. 1995 . Everything you already know about EIA (but don't often admit) . Environmental Impact Assessment Review , 15 : 109 – 114 .
   Google Scholar
• Cashmore , M. , Gwilliam , R. , Morgan , R. and Bond , A. 2004 . The interminable issue of effectiveness: substantive purposes, outcomes and research challenges in the advancement of environmental impact assessment theory . Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal , 22 : 295 – 310 .
   Google Scholar
• European Commission . 2001 . European Commission's Guidance on EIA: EIS Review. , Luxembourg : Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. .
   Google Scholar
• Glasson , J. , Therivel , R. and Chadwick , A. 2005 . Introduction to Environmental Impact Assessment, , 3rd edition. , London and New York : Spon Press .
   Google Scholar
• Gray , I. and Edward-Jones , G. 2003 . A review of environmental statements in the British forest sector . Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal , 21 ( 4 ) : 303 – 312 .
   Google Scholar
• Hilden , M. , Ostamo , E. , Rahikainen , M. and Päivärinne , A.-M. 1997 . Arviointiselostusten laadun Arviointi. , Helsinki : Ympäristöopas 33. Suomen ympäristökeskuksen julkaisuja .
   Google Scholar
• Hokkanen , P. 2007 . Kansalaisosallistuminen Ympäristövaikutusten Arviointimenettelyssä. , Tampereen Yliopistopaino Oy .
   Google Scholar
• Hokkanen , P. and Polonen , I. 2006 . Kansalaisosallistuminen ympäristövaikutusten arviointimenettelyn seulontavaiheessa - tarkastelukohteena YVA-lainsäädännön uudistus . Oikeus , 35 ( 4 ) : 558 – 573 .
   Google Scholar
• Jay , S. , Jones , C. , Slinn , P. and Wood , C. 2007 . Environmental impact assessment: Retrospect and prospect . Environmental Impact Assessment Review , 27 : 287 – 300 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koskinen , J. 2006 . Jätteen Rinnakkaispolton Rooli ja Rajaehdot Suomen Jätestrategiassa. Valtakunnallinen Jätesuunnitelma Vuoteen 2016. Taustaselvitys Osa 1. Suomen ympäristökeskuksen raportteja 15/2006
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence , D. P. 2003 . Environmental Impact Assessment. Practical Solutions to Recurrent Problems. , Hoboken, New Jersey : John Wiley & Sons, Inc. .
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence , D. P. 2007 . Impact significance determination - back to basics . Environmental Impact Assessment Review , 27 : 755 – 769 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee , N. and Colley , R. 1992 . Reviewing the Quality of Environmental Statements., , 2nd edition , Manchester : Department of Planning and Landscape, University of Manchester. . Occasional paper 24
   Google Scholar
• Lee , N. , Colley , R. , Bonde , J. and Simpson , J. 1999 . Reviewing the Quality of Environmental Statements and Environmental Appraisals. , Manchester : Department of Planning and Landscape, University of Manchester. . Occasional Paper 55
   Google Scholar
• Meloni , E. 2004 . Mikä jätteenpoltossa kuumentaa tunteita? . Tekniikka ja Kunta , : 30 – 33 . 2/2004
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Environment . 2008 . The EIA support material. Available at http://www.ymparisto.fi/default.asp?node=14140&lan=fi,last accessed 15 February 2010
   Google Scholar
• Morrison-Saunders , A. and Arts , J. 2004 . Assessing Impacts: Handbook of EIA and SEA Follow-up. , London : Earthscan. .
   Google Scholar
• Morrison-Saunders , A. and Cappelluti , J. 2001 . Practitioner perspectives on what influences EIA quality . Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal , 19 ( 4 ) : 321 – 325 .
   Google Scholar
• Mostert , E. 1995 . Commissions for Environmental Impact Assessment; Their Contribution to the Effectiveness of Environmental Impact Assessment. , Delft : Delft University Press. .
   Google Scholar
• Pinho , P. , Rodrigo , M. and Monterosso , A. 2007 . The quality of Portuguese Environmental Impact Studies: The case of small hydropower projects . Environmental Impact Assessment Review , 27 : 189 – 205 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polonen , I. 2006 . Quality control and the substantive influence of environmental impact assessment in Finland . Environmental Impact Assessment Review , 26 : 481 – 491 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polonen , I. 2007 . Ympäristövaikutusten Arviointimenettely. Tutkimus YVA-menettelyn oikeudellisesta asemasta ja kehittämistarpeista ympäristöllisen vaikuttavuuden näkökulmasta. Suomalaisen Lakimiesyhdistyksen julkaisuja, A-sarja No. 280. Helsinki
   Google Scholar
• Ross , W. A. , Morrison-Saunders , A. and Marshall , R. 2006 . Common sense in environmental impact assessment: it is not as common as it should be . Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal , 24 ( 1 ) : 3 – 22 .
   Google Scholar
• Saarikoski , H. 2000 . Environmental impact assessment (EIA) as collaborative learning process . Environmental Impact Assessment Review , 20 : 681 – 700 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler , B. 1996 . International Study of the Effectiveness of Environmental Assessment. Environmental Assessment in a Changing World: Evaluating Practice to Improve Performance. Available at http://www.iaia.org/publicdocuments/EIA/EAE/EAE_IOE.PDF,last accessed 15 February 2010
   Google Scholar
• Sandham , L. and Pretorius , H. 2008 . A review of EIA report quality in the North West province of South Africa . Environmental Impact Assessment Review , 28 : 229 – 240 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snell , T. and Cowell , R. 2005 . Scoping in environmental impact assessment: Balancing precaution and efficiency . Environmental Impact Assessment Review , 26 : 359 – 376 .
   Google Scholar
• Steinemann , A. 2001 . Improving alternatives for environmental impact assessment . Environmental Impact Assessment Review , 21 : 3 – 21 .
   Google Scholar
• Turtiainen , M. 2001 . YVA:n laadun arvioiminen ja laadun kehittyminen . Ympäristö- ja Terveys-lehti , 6/2001 : 60 – 65 .
   Google Scholar
• Waldeck , S. , Morrison-Saunders , A. and Annandale , D. 2003 . Effectiveness of non-legal EIA guidance from the perspective of consultants in Western Australia . Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal , 21 ( 3 ) : 251 – 256 .
   Google Scholar
• Wathern , P. 1988 . “ An introductory guide to EIA ” . In Environmental Impact Assessment. Theory and Pratice , Edited by: Wathern , P. London and New York : Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Weston , J. 2000 . EIA, decision-making theory and screening and scoping in UK practice . Journal of Environmental Planning and Management , 43 ( 2 ) : 185 – 203 .
   Google Scholar
• Wood , C. 2003 . Environmental Impact Assessment. A Comparative Review, , 2nd edition. , Essex : Pearson Education Ltd .
   Google Scholar
• Wood , G. , Glasson , J. and Becker , J. 2005 . EIA scoping in England and Wales: Practitioner approaches, perspectives and constraints . Environmental Impact Assessment Review , 26 : 221 – 241 .
   Google Scholar