Apportionment of Ambient Primary and Secondary Fine Particulate Matter during a 2001 Summer Intensive Study at the CMU Supersite and NETL Pittsburgh Site

References

• Turpin, B.J.; Huntzicker, J.J.; Larson, S.M.; Cass, G.R. Los Angeles Summer Midday Particulate Carbon: Primary and Secondary Aerosol; Environ. Sci. Technol. 1991, 25, 1788–1793.
   Google Scholar
• Cabada, J.C.; Pandis, S.N.; Subramanian, R.; Robinson, A.L.; Polidori, A.; Turpin, B. Estimating the Secondary Organic Aerosol Contribution to PM2.5 Using the OC to EC Ratio Method; Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2004, 38, 140–155.
   Google Scholar
• Schauer, J.J.; Cass, G.R. Source Apportionment of Wintertime Gas-Phase and Particle-Phase Air Pollutants Using Organic Compounds as Tracers; Environ. Sci. Technol. 2000, 34, 1821–1832.
   Google Scholar
• Modey, W.K. Ph.D. Dissertation; Brigham Young University: Provo, UT, August 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, R.R.; Modey, W.K.; Martello, D.V.; Lucas, L.J.; Davidson C.I.; Eatough, D.J. Apportionment of Ambient Primary and Secondary Pollutants during a 2001 Summer Study in Pittsburgh Using U.S. Environmental Protection Agency UNMIX; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 2005, 56, 1301–1319.
   Google Scholar
• Pekney, N.J.; Davidson, C.I.; Robinson, A.;, Zhou, L.; Hopke, P.; Eatough, D. (2005) Major Source Categories for PM2.5 in Pittsburgh Using PMF and UNMIX; Aerosol Sci. Technol. 40, 910–924.
   Google Scholar
• Eatough, D.J.; Anderson, R.R.; Martello, D.V.; Modey W.K.; Mangelson, N.F. Apportionment of Ambient Primary and Secondary PM2.5 during a 2001 Summer Intensive Study at the NETL Pittsburgh Site Using PMF2 and EPA UNMIX; Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2005, 40, 925–940.
   Google Scholar
• Modey, W.K.; Anderson, R.R.; Martello, D.V.; Takahama, S.; Lucas, L.J.; Davidson, C.I.; Eatough, D.J. Ambient Fine Particulate Concentrations and Chemical Composition at Two Sampling Sites in Metropolitan Pittsburgh: a 2001 Intensive Summer Study; Atmos. Environ. 2005, 38, 3165–3178.
   Google Scholar
• Lewtas, J.; Booth, D.; Pang, Y.; Reimer, S.; Eatough, D.J.; Gundel, L. Comparison of Sampling Methods for Semi-Volatile Organic Carbon (SVOM) Associated with PM2.5; Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2001, 34, 9–22.
   Google Scholar
• Modey, W.K.; Eatough, D.J. Twenty-Four-Hour PC-BOSS Air-Monitoring Results from the NETL Fine-Particulate Sampling Site in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: an Annual Perspective; Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2004, 38, 194–204.
   Google Scholar
• Wittig, A.E.; Anderson, N.J.; Khlystov, A.Y.; Pandis, S.N.; Davidson, C.I.; Robinson, A.L. Pittsburgh Air Quality Study Overview; Atmos. Environ. 2004, 38, 3107–3125.
   Google Scholar
• Subramanian, R.; Khlystov, A.Y.; Cabada, J.C.; Robinson, A.L. Positive and Negative Artifacts in Particulate Organic Carbon Measurements with Denuded and Undenuded Sampler Configurations; Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2004, 38, 27–48.
   Google Scholar
• Eatough, D.J.; Wadsworth, A.; Eatough, D.A.; Crawford, J.W.; Hansen, L.D.; Lewis, E.A. A Multi-System, Multi-Channel Diffusion Denuder Sampler for the Determination of Fine Particulate Organic Material in the Atmosphere; Atmos. Environ. 1993, 27A, 1213–1219.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, E.C.; Novakov, T. Application of Thermal Analysis to the Characterization of Organic Aerosol Particles; Sci. Total Environ. 1982, 23, 227–238.
   Google Scholar
• Mangelson, N.F.; Nielson, K.K.; Eatough, D.J.; Christensen, J.J.; Izatt, R.M.; Richards, D.O. Proton Induced X-Ray Emission Analysis of Pima Indian Autopsy Tissues; Anal. Chem. 1979, 51, 1187–1194.
   Google Scholar
• Turpin, B.J.; Lim, H.-J. Species Contributions to PM2.5 Mass Concen trations: Revisiting Common Assumptions for Estimating Organic Mass; Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2001, 35, 602–610.
   Google Scholar
• Polissar, A.V.; Hopke, P.; Malm W.C.; Sisler, J.F. Atmospheric Aerosol over Alaska. 2. Elemental Composition and Sources; J. Geophys. Res. 1998, 103, 19045–19057.
   Google Scholar
• Paatero, P. Least Squares Formulation of Robust, Non-Negative Factor Analysis; Chemomet. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1997, 37, 13–35.
   Google Scholar
• Paatero P.; Hopke P.K.; Song X.-H.; Ramadan Z. Understanding and Controlling Rotations in Factor Analytic Models; Chemomet. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2002, 60, 253–264.
   Google Scholar
• National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; available at http://www.arl.noaa.gov/ready/hysplit4.html (accessed 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Wietkamp, E.; Lipsky, E.; Robinson, A.; Anderson, N.; Leifeste, H.; Subramanian, R.; Cabada-Amaya, J.; Khlystov, A.; Stanier, C.; Lucas, L.; Takahama, S.; Wittig, B.; Davidson, C.; Pandis, S.; Polidori, A.; Lim, J.-J.; Turpin, B.; Pancras, P.; Ondov, J. Fence Line Sampling Adjacent to a Large Coke Production Facility in Pittsburgh, PA. Presented at the Association of Aerosol Research Meeting, Particulate Matter: Atmospheric Sciences, Exposure, and the Fourth Colloquium on PM and Human Health, Pittsburgh, PA, March 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, R.R.; Martello, D.V.; White, C.M.; Crist, K.C.; Kuruvilla, J.; Modey, W.K.; Eatough, D.J. The Regional Nature of PM2.5 Episodes in the Upper Ohio River Valley; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 2004, 54, 971–984.
   Google Scholar
• Grieshop, A.P.; Lipske, E.M.; Pekney, N.J.; Takahama, S.; Robinson A.L. 2005 Diesel and Gasoline Vehicle Gaseous and Fine Particle Emission Factors Measured in a Highway Tunnel in Pittsburgh, PA. Atmos. Environ. 2006, 40, 287–298.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, C.W.; Norris, G.A.; Conner, T.L.; Henry, R.C. Source Apportionment of Phoenix PM2.5 Aerosol with the UNMIX Receptor Model; J.Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 2003, 53, 325–338.
   Google Scholar
• Tang W.; Raymonds, T.; Wittig, B.; Davidson, C.; Pandis, S.; Robinson, A.; Crist, K. Spatial Variations of PM2.5 during the Pittsburgh Air Quality Study; Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2004, 38, 80–90.
   Google Scholar
• Lioy, P.J.; Zelenka, M.; Reiss, N.; Cheng, M.D.; Wilson, W. The Effects of Sampling Duration on the Ability to Resolve Source Types Using Factor Analysis; Atmos. Environ. 1989, 23, 239–254.
   Google Scholar
• Musick, D. A Summary of the Ambient Air Program for PM2.5; EM 1999, February, 17–20.
   Google Scholar