Comparison of the Industrial Source Complex and AERMOD Dispersion Models: Case Study for Human Health Risk Assessment

References

• 40 CFR Part 51: Revision to the Guideline on Air Quality Models: Adoption of a Preferred General Purpose (Flat and Complex Terrain) Dispersion Model and Other Revisions. Fed. Regist. 2005, 70(216), 68218–68261.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, D.J.; Spanton, A.M.; Bennett, M.; Dunkerley, F.; Griffiths, R.F.; Fisher, B.E.A.; Timmis, R.J. Evaluation of New Generation Atmospheric Dispersion Models; Int. J. Environ. Pollut. 2002, 18, 22–32.
   Google Scholar
• Hanna, S.R.; Egan, B.A.; Purdum, J.; Wagler, J. Evaluation of the ADMS, AERMOD, and ISC3 Dispersion Models with the OPTEX, Duke Forest, Kincaid, Indianapolis and Lovett Field Datasets; Int. J. Environ. Pollut. 2001, 16, 301–314.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, J.S.; Carruthers, D.; Stocker, J.; Paumier, J. Application of ASTM D6589 to Evaluate Dispersion Model Performance; Int. J. Environ. Pollut. 2003, 20, 4–10.
   Google Scholar
• Radonjic, Z.; Garisto, N. Dispersion Modeling, Comparison to Available Data and Model Inter-Comparison at Pickering Nuclear Generating Station (PNGS) Using ISCST3, ISC-Prime, AERMOD, and CALPUFF; In Proceedings of A&WMA’s Air Quality Modeling: New Methods for a New Reality; A&WMA: Pittsburgh, PA, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Ramakrishnan, D.; Zwicke, G.; Wall, D.; Remsberg, A.M, Jr. A Performance Comparison of AERMOD vs. Current Guideline Models in a Real World Scenario; In Proceedings of A&WMA’s Guideline on Air Quality Models: The Path Forward; A&WMA: Pittsburgh, PA, 2003; Paper 03-A–27.
   Google Scholar
• Sax, T.; Isakov, V. A Case Study for Assessing Uncertainty in Local-Scale Regulatory Air Quality Modeling Applications; Atmos. Environ. 2003, 37, 3481–3489.
   Google Scholar
• Schulze, R.H. Procedures Used by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) to Develop and Adopt Newer Dispersion Models; Int. J. Environ. Pollut. 2001, 16, 483–494.
   Google Scholar
• Schulze, R.H.; Dai, W.; Otto, C.M. Managing Air Quality during Regulatory Changes; Int. J. Environ. Pollut. 2003, 20, 121–127.
   Google Scholar
• Tarde, J.A.; Westbrook, J.A. Air Quality Modeling in a Highly Industrialized Valley Regime: a Comparison of AERMOD-PRIME to ISCST-PRIME and ISCST3 Results for PM10 Emissions. In Air & Waste Management Association’s Guideline on Air Quality Models: the Path Forward; A&WMA: Pittsburgh, PA, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, S.G.; Cimorelli, A.J.; Paine, R.J.; Brode, R.W.; Weil, J.C.; Venkatram, A.; Wilson, R.B.; Lee, R.F.; Peters, W.D. AERMOD. A Dispersion Model for Industrial Source Applications; Part II: Model Performance Against 17 Field Study Databases; J. Appl. Meteorol. 2005, 44, 694–708.
   Google Scholar
• Brownell, F.W. Clean Air Act. In Environmental Law Handbook, 16th ed.; Sullivan, T., Ed.; Government Institutes: Rockville, MD, 2001, Chapter 5, pp 218–222.
   Google Scholar
• User’s Guide for the Industrial Source Complex (ISC3) Dispersion Models Volume I: User Instructions; EPA-454/B-95-003a; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards: Research Triangle Park, NC, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Boubel, R.W.; Fox, D.L.; Turner, D.B.; Stern, A.C. Fundamentals of Air Pollution, 3rd ed.; Academic: San Diego, CA, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Users Guide to the Building Profile Input Program (BPIP); EPA-454/R-93-038; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards: Research Triangle Park, NC, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Compendium of Reports from the Peer Review Process for AERMOD; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards: Research Triangle Park, NC, 2002; available at http://www.epa.gov/scram001/7thconf/aermod/dockrpt.pdf (accessed 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Sorbjan, Z. Air Pollution Meteorology. In Air Quality Modeling—Theories, Methodologies, Computational Techniques, and Available Databases and Software. Vol. 1: Fundamentals; Zannetti, P., Ed.; EnviroComp Institute and A&WMA: Pittsburgh, PA, 2003; Chapter 4, pp 37–100.
   Google Scholar
• Revised Draft User’s Guide for the AERMOD Meteorological Preprocessor (AERMET); U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards: Research Triangle Park, NC, 1998; available at http://www.epa.gov/scram001/7thconf/aermod/aermetug.pdf (accessed 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Paine, R.J.; Lew, F. Consequence Analysis for ISC-PRIME, Prepared for the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), Palo Alto, CA; EPRI Publications No. TR-2460026, National Technical Information Service (NTIS) Publications No. PB98-156516; U.S. Department of Commerce, NTIS: Springfield, VA, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Schulman, L.L.; Strimaitis, D.G.; Scire, J.S. Addendum to ISC3 User’s Guide. The Plume Rise and Building Downwash Model, 1997; available at http://www.epa.gov/scram001/7thconf/iscprime/useguide.pdf (accessed 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Trinity Consultants. BREEZE ISC and AERMOD Users Guide, Version 3.5. Trinity Consultants: Dallas, TX, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Air Toxics Risk Assessment Reference Library, Vol. 1: Technical Resource Manual; EPA-453-K-04-001A. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards: Research Triangle Park, NC, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. Science and Judgement in Risk Assessment; National Academies: Washington, DC, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Beychok, M.R. Fundamentals of Stack Gas Dispersion, 3rd ed. Newport Beach, CA, 1994.
   Google Scholar