Source Apportionment of Fine Particles in Tennessee Using a Source-Oriented Model

References

• Klemm, R.J.; Mason, R.M., Jr.; Heilig, C.M.; Neas, L.M.; Dockery, D.W. Is Daily Mortality Associated Specifically with Fine Particles? Data Reconstruction and Replication of Analyses; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 2000, 50, 1215–1222.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, J.G. Visibility: Science and Regulation; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 2002, 52, 628–713.
   Google Scholar
• Slater, J.F.; Dibb, J.E.; Keim, B.D.; Talbot, R.W. Light Extinction by Fine Atmospheric Particles in the White Mountains Region of New Hampshire and Its Relationship to Air Mass Transport; Sci. Total Environ. 2002, 287, 221–239.
   Google Scholar
• National Air quality and Emissions Trends Report, 1999; EPA 454/R-01-004; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Research Triangle Park, NC, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, P.K.H., Brook, J.R.; Dabek-Zlotorzynska, E.; Mabury, S.A. Identification of the Major Sources Contributing to PM2.5 Observed in Toronto; Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37, 4831–4840.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, C.W.; Norris, G.A.; Conner, T.L.; Henry, R.C. Source Apportionment of Phoenix PM2.5 Aerosol with the Unmix Receptor Model; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 2003, 53, 325–338.
   Google Scholar
• Maykut, N.N.; Lewtas, J.; Kim, E.; Larson, T.V. Source Apportionment of PM2.5 at an Urban IMPROVE Site in Seattle, Washington; Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37, 5135–5142.
   Google Scholar
• Gertler, A.W.; Gillies, J.A.; Pierson, W.R. An Assessment of the Mobile Source Contribution to PM10 and PM2.5 in the United States; Water Air Soil Pollut. 2000, 123, 203–214.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. Research Priorities for Airborne Particulate Matter: II—Evaluating Research Progress and Updating the Portfolio; National Academy Press: Washington, DC, 1999
   Google Scholar
• Kleeman, M.J.; Hughes, L.S.; Allen, J.O.; Cass, G.R. Source Contributions to the Size and Composition Distribution of Atmospheric Particles: Southern California in September 1996; Environ. Sci. Technol. 1999, 33, 4331–4341.
   Google Scholar
• Mysliwiec, M.J.; Kleeman, M.J. Source Apportionment of Secondary Airborne Particulate Matter in a Polluted Atmosphere; Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36, 5376–5384.
   Google Scholar
• Pun, B.K.; Wu, S.Y.; Seigneur, C. Contribution of Biogenic Emissions to the Formation of Ozone and Particulate Matter in the Eastern United States; Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36, 3586–3596.
   Google Scholar
• Doraiswamy, P. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, December 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Byun, D.W.; Ching, J.K.S. Science Algorithms of the EPA MODELS-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) Modeling System; EPA/600/R-99/030; Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Nenes, A.; Pandis, S.N.; Pilinis, C. ISORROPIA: a New Thermodynamic Equilibrium Model for Multiphase Multicomponent Inorganic Aerosols; Aquatic Geochem. 1998, 4, 123–152.
   Google Scholar
• Nenes, A.; Pandis, S.N.; Pilinis, C. Continued Development and Testing of a New Thermodynamic Aerosol Module for Urban and Regional Air Quality Models; Atmos. Environ. 1999, 33, 1553–1560.
   Google Scholar
• Dudhia, J.; Bresch, J.F. A Global Version of the PSU-NCAR Mesoscale Model; Mon. Weather Rev. 2002, 130, 2989–3007.
   Google Scholar
• Dudhia, J.; Gill, D.; Guo, Y.R.; Hansen, D.; Manning, K.; Wang, W. PSU/ NCAR Mesoscale Modeling System Tutorial Class Notes (MM5 Modeling System Version 2); National Center for Atmospheric Research: Boulder, CO, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Grell, G.A.; Dudhia, J.; Stauffer, D. A Description of the Fifth-Generation Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5). NCAR Technical Note, TN-398 + STR; National Center for Atmospheric Research: Boulder, CO, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Parkhurst, W.J.; Tanner, R.L.; Weatherford, F.P.; Valente, R.J.; Meagher, J.F. Historic PM2.5/PM10 Concentrations in the Southeastern United States—Potential Implications of the Revised Particulate Matter Standard; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 1999, 49, 1060–1067.
   Google Scholar
• Binkowski, F.S.; Roselle, S.J. Models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) Model Aerosol Component 1. Model Description; J. Geophys. Res. 2003, 108, AAC 3-1–AAC 3–18.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, R.E.; Koo, B.; Lau, S.; Tesche, T.W.; McNally, D.; Loomis, C.; Stella, G.; Tonnesen, G.; Wang, Z. VISTAS Emissions and Air Quality Modeling—Phase I Task 4cd Report: Model Performance Evaluation and Model Sensitivity Tests for Three Phase I Episodes; ENVIRON International Corporation, Alpine Geophysics LLC and CE-CERT of University of California, Riverside: Riverside, CA, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, W.T.; Miller, T.L.; Reed, G.D.; Tang, A.M.Y.; Doraiswamy, P.; Sanhueza, P. Effects of Growth in VMT and New Mobile Source Emission Standards on NOx and VOC Emissions in Tennessee, 1999–2030 (Based on Mobile6-Final Version); The University of Tennessee: Knoxville, TN, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. M.S. Thesis, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, May 2003.
   Google Scholar
• MCNC Environmental Modeling Center. Sparse Matrix Operator Kernel Emissions (SMOKE) Modeling System Version 1.4.2. User Manual; MCNC Environmental Modeling Center (now with Carolina Environmental Program at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill): Chapel Hill, NC, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Doraiswamy, P.; Davis, W.T.; Miller, T.L.; Fu, J.S. Contribution of On-road Mobile Sources to PM2.5 in Tennessee; In Proceedings of A&WMA’s 97th Annual Conference & Exhibition, Pittsburgh, PA, June 22–25, 2004; Paper 112.
   Google Scholar
• Draft Guidance for Demonstrating Attainment of Air Quality Goals for PM2.5 and Regional Haze; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Research Triangle Park, NC, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Seigneur, C. Current Status of Air Quality Models for Particulate Matter; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 2001, 51, 1508–1521.
   Google Scholar
• Schell, B.; Ackermann, I.J.; Hass, H.; Binkowski, F.S.; Ebel, A. Modeling the Formation of Secondary Organic Aerosol within a Comprehensive Air Quality Model System; J. Geophys. Res. 2001, 106, 28275–28293.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, R.E.; Koo, B.; Guenther, A.; Yarwood, G.; McNally, D.; Tesche, T.W.; Tonnesen, G.; Boylan, J.; Brewer, P. Model Sensitivity Evaluationfor Organic Carbon Using Two Multi-Pollutant Air Quality Models That Simulate Regional Haze in the Southeastern United States; Atmos. Environ. 2006, 40, 4960–4972.
   Google Scholar
• Alpert, P.; Tsidulko, M.; Stein, U. Can Sensitivity Studies Yield Absolute Comparisons for the Effects of Several Processes?; J. Atmos. Sci. 1995, 52, 597–601.
   Google Scholar
• Seinfeld, J.H.; Pandis, S.N. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: from Air Pollution to Climate Change; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Elminir, H.K. Dependence of Urban Air Pollutants on Meteorology; Sci. Total Environ. 2005, 350, 225–237.
   Google Scholar
• Mossetti, S.; Angius, S.P.; Angelino, E. Assessing the Impact of Particulate Matter Sources in the Milan Urban Area; Int. J. Environ. Pollut. 2005, 24, 247–259.
   Google Scholar
• Yun, J. M.S. Thesis, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, August 2004.
   Google Scholar