Source Apportionment of Fine Particulate Matter in Phoenix, AZ, Using Positive Matrix Factorization

References

• Dockery, D.W.; Pope, C.A., III. Acute Respiratory Effects of Particulate Air Pollution; Annu. Rev. Public Health 1994, 15, 107–132.
   Google Scholar
• Dockery, D.W.; Pope, C.A.; Xu, X.P.; Spengler, J.D.; Ware, J.H.; Fay, M.E.; Ferris, B.G.; Speizer, F.E. An Association between Air Pollution and Mortality in Six U.S. Cities; New Engl. J. Med. 1993, 329, 1753–1759.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, J.; Lurmann, F.; Winer, A.; Lu, R.; Turco, R.; Funk, T. Development of an Individual Exposure Model for Application to the Southern California Children’s Health Study; Atmos. Environ. 2005, 39, 259–273.
   Google Scholar
• Gilliland, F.; Avol, E.; Kinney, P.; Jerret, M.; Dvonch, T.; Lurmann, F.; Buckley, T.; Breysse, P.; Keeler, J.; De Villiers, T.; McConnell, R. Air Pollution Exposure Assessment for Epidemiologic Studies of Pregnant Women and Children: Lessons Learned from the Centers for Children’s Environmental Health and Disease Prevention Research; Environ. Health Perspect. 2005, 113, 1447–1454.
   Google Scholar
• Malm, W.C.; Schichtel, B.A.; Pitchford, M.L.; Ashbaugh, L.L.; Eldred, R.A. Spatial and Monthly Trends in Speciated Fine Particle Concentration in the United States; J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. February 12, 2004, 109, D03306, doi: 10.1029/2003JD003739.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, J.G. 2002 Critical Review—Visibility: Science and regulation; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 2002, 52, 628–713.
   Google Scholar
• Delucchi, M.A.; Murphy, J.J.; McCubbin, D.R. The Health and Visibility Cost of Air Pollution: a Comparison of Estimation Methods; J. Environ. Manage. 2002, 64, 139–152.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Highway Vehicle Emission Estimates-II; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air and Radiation, Office of Mobile Sources, National Vehicle and Fuels Emission Laboratory: Ann Arbor, MI, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Ramadan, Z.; Song, X.-H.; Hopke, P.K. Identification of Sources of Phoenix Aerosol by Positive Matrix Factorization; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 2000, 50, 1308–1320.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, C.W.; Norris, G.A.; Conner, T.L.; Henry, R.C. Source Apportionment of Phoenix PM2 . 5 Aerosol with the Unmix Receptor Model; J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 2003, 53, 325–338.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhns, H.; Green, M.; Pitchford, M.; Vasconcelos, L.; White, W.; Mirabella, V. Attribution of Particulate Sulfur in the Grand Canyon to Specific Point Sources Using Tracer-Aerosol Gradient Interpretive Technique (TAGIT); J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 1999, 49, 906–915.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) Program; 2004; available at http://www.epa.gov/tri (accessed 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Watson, J.G.; Chow, J.C.; Lurmann, F.W.; Musarra, S.P. Ammonium Nitrate, Nitric Acid, and Ammonia Equilibrium in Wintertime Phoenix, Arizona; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 1994, 44, 405–412.
   Google Scholar
• Zanini, G.; Berico, M.; Monforti, F.; Vitali, L.; Zambonelli, S.; Chiavarini, S.; Georgiadis, T.; Nardino, M. Concentration Measurement in a Road Tunnel as a Method to Assess “Real-World” Vehicles Exhaust Emissions; Atmos. Environ. 2006, 40, 1242–1254.
   Google Scholar
• Lowenthal, D.H.; Zielinska, B.; Chow, J.C.; Watson, J.G.; Gautam, M.; Ferguson, D.H.; Neuroth, G.R.; Stevens, K.D. Characterization of Heavy-Duty Diesel Vehicle Emissions; Atmos. Environ. 1994, 28, 731–744.
   Google Scholar
• Schauer, J.J.; Cass, G.R. Source Apportionment of Wintertime Gas-Phase and Particle-Phase Air Pollutants Using Organic Compounds as Tracers; Environ. Sci. Technol. 2000, 34, 1821–1832.
   Google Scholar
• Kleeman, M.J.; Schauer, J.J.; Cass, G.R. Size and Composition Distribution of Fine Particulate Matter Emitted from Motor Vehicles; Environ. Sci. Technol. 2000, 34, 1132–1142.
   Google Scholar
• Schauer, J.J.; Kleeman, M.J.; Cass, G.R.; Simoneit, B.R.T. Measurement of Emissions from Air Pollution Sources. 2. C1 through C30 Organic Compounds from Medium Duty Diesel Trucks; Environ. Sci. Technol. 1999, 33, 1578–1587.
   Google Scholar
• Chow, J.C.; Watson, J.G.; Pritchett, L.C.; Pierson, W.R.; Frazier, C.A.; Purcell, R.G. The DRI Thermal/Optical Reflectance Carbon Analysis System: Description, Evaluation and Applications in U.S. Air Quality Studies; Atmos. Environ. 1993, 27A, 1185–1201.
   Google Scholar
• Chow, J.C.; Watson, J.G.; Chen, L.-W.A.; Paredes-Miranda, G.; Chang,M.-C.O.; Trimble, D.; Fung, K.; Zhang, H.; Yu, J.Z. Refining Temperature Measures in Thermal/Optical Carbon Analysis; Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2005, 5, 4477–4505.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, J.G.; Chow, J.C.; Chen, L.-W.A. Summary of Organic and Elemental Carbon/Black Carbon Analysis Methods and Intercompari-sons; Aerosol Air Qual. 2005, 5, 65–102.
   Google Scholar
• Chow, J.C.; Watson, J.G.; Crow, D.; Lowenthal, D.H.; Merrifield, T. Comparison of IMPROVE and NIOSH Carbon Measurements; Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2001, 34, 23–34.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, E.; Hopke, P.K.; Edgerton, E.S. Source Identification of Atlanta Aerosol by Positive Matrix Factorization; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 2003, 53, 731–739.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, E.; Hopke, P.K. Improving Source Apportionment of Fine Particles in the Eastern United States Utilizing Temperature-Resolved Carbon Fractions; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 2005, 55, 1456–1463.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, E.; Hopke, P.K.; Edgerton, E.S. Improving Source Identification of Atlanta Aerosol Using Temperature Resolved Carbon Fractions in Positive Matrix Factorization; Atmos. Environ. 2004, 38, 3349–3362.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, R.C. History and Fundamentals of Multivariate Air Quality Receptor Models; Chemometrics Intell. Lab. Systems 1997, 37, 525–530.
   Google Scholar
• Malm, W.C.; Sisler, J.F.; Huffman, D.; Eldred, R.A.; Cahill, T.A. Spatial and Seasonal Trends in Particulate Concentration and Optical Extinction in the United States; J. Geophys. Res. 1994, 99, 1347–1370.
   Google Scholar
• Colorado State University. Overview of IMPROVE and Visibility. IMPROVE, 2004; available at http://vista.cira.colostate.edu/improve/Overview/Overview.htm (accessed 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Sisler, J.F.; Malm, W.C. Interpretation of Trends of PM2.5 and Reconstructed Visibility from the IMPROVE Network; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 2000, 50, 775–789.
   Google Scholar
• Colorado State University. Standard Aerosol-Type Equations. IMPROVE; available at http://vista.cira.colostate.edu/improve/Tools/AerTypeEqs.htm (accessed 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Kim, E.; Hopke, P.K. Improving Source Identification of Fine Particles in a Rural Northeastern U.S. Area Utilizing Temperature-Resolved Carbon Fractions; J. Geophys. Res. 2004, 109, D09204.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J.H.; Yoshida, Y.; Turpin, B.J.; Hopke, P.K.; Poirot, R.L.; Lioy, P.J.; Oxley, J.C. Identification of Sources Contributing to Mid-Atlantic Regional Aerosol; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 2002, 52, 1186–1205.
   Google Scholar
• Polissar, A.V.; Hopke, P.K.; Poirot, R.L. Atmospheric Aerosol over Vermont: Chemical Composition and Sources; Environ. Sci. Technol. 2001, 35, 4604–4621.
   Google Scholar
• Poirot, R.L.; Wishinski, P.R.; Hopke, P.K.; Polissar, A.V. Comparative Application of Multiple Receptor Methods to Identify Aerosol Sources in Northern Vermont; Environ. Sci. Technol. 2001, 35, 4622–4636.
   Google Scholar
• Yakovleva, E.; Hopke, P.K.; Wallace, L. Receptor Modeling Assessment of Particle Total Exposure Assessment Methodology Data; Environ. Sci. Technol. 1999, 33, 3645–3652.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, L.; Kim, E.; Hopke, P.K.; Stanier, C.O.; Pandis, S. Advanced Factor Analysis on Pittsburgh Particle Size-Distribution Data; Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2004, 38, 118–132.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, W.; Hopke, P.K.; Karl, T. Source Identification of Volatile Organic Compounds in Houston, TX; Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38, 1338–1347.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S.G.; Frankel, A.; Hafner, H.R. Source Apportionment of VOCs in the Los Angeles Area Using Positive Matrix Factorization; Atmos. Environ. 2007, 41, 227–237.
   Google Scholar
• Pekney, N.J.; Davidson, C.I.; Robinson, A.; Zhou, L.; Hopke, P.; Eatough, D.; Rogge, W.F. Major Source Categories for PM2.5 in Pittsburgh Using PMF and UNMIX; Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 910–924.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, I.; Hopke, P.K. Comparison of Source Apportionments of Fine Particulate Matter at Two San Jose Speciation Trends Network Sites; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 2006, 56, 1287–1300.
   Google Scholar
• Song, X.H.; Polissar, A.V.; Hopke, P.K. Sources of Fine Particle Composition in the Northeastern U.S.; Atmos. Environ. 2001, 35, 5277–5286.
   Google Scholar
• Paatero, P. Least Squares Formulation of Robust Non-Negative Factor Analysis; Chemometrics Intell. Lab. Systems 1997, 37, 23–35.
   Google Scholar
• Paatero, P.; Tapper, U. Positive Matrix Factorization: a Non-Negative Factor Model with Optimal Utilization of Error Estimates of Data Values; Environmetrics 1994, 5, 111–126.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, J.G.; Chow, J.C.; Pace, T.G. Receptor modeling for air quality management. In Chemical Mass Balance; Hopke, P.K., Ed.; Elsevier Press: New York, 1991; pp 83–116.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, R.C.; Lewis, C.W.; Hopke, P.K.; Williamson, H.J. Review of Receptor Model Fundamentals; Atmos. Environ. 1984, 18, 1507–1515.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, J.G.; Robinson, J.F.; Chow, J.C.; Henry, R.C.; Kim, B.M.; Pace, T.G.; Meyer, E.L.; Nguyen, Q. The USEPA/DRI Chemical Mass Balance Receptor Model, CMB 7.0; Environ. Soft. 1990, 5, 38–49.
   Google Scholar
• Hopke, P.K. A Guide to Positive Matrix Factorization; Prepared for Positive Matrix Factorization Program, Potsdam, NY, by the Department of Chemistry, Clarkson University: Potsdam, NY, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Eberly, S. EPA PMF 1.1 User’s Guide; Prepared by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Exposure Research Laboratory: Research Triangle Park, NC, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Paatero, P. The Multilinear Engine—a Table-Driven, Least Squares Program for Solving Multilinear Problems, Including the N-Way Parallel Factor Analysis Model; J. Graph. Stat. 1999, 8, 854–888.
   Google Scholar
• Ashbaugh, L.L.; Malm, W.C.; Sader, W.Z. A Residence Time Probability Analysis of Sulfur Concentrations at Grand Canyon National Park; Atmos. Environ. 1985, 19, 1263–1270.
   Google Scholar
• Draxler, R.R.; Hess, G.D. Description of the HYSPLIT 4 Modeling System; ERL ARL-224; Technical Memorandum by National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration: Silver Spring, MD, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• McCoy, J.; Johnston, K. Using ArcGIS Spatial Analyst; ESRI: Redlands, CA, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Cressie, N.A.C. Statistics for Spatial Data; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York, NY, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, D.; Sass-Kortsak, A.; Purdham, J.T.; Dales, R.E.; Brook, J.R. Sources of Personal Exposure to Fine Particles in Toronto, Canada; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 2005, 55, 1134–1146.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, E.; Hopke, P.K.; Pinto, J.P.; Wilson, W.E. Spatial Variability of Fine Particle Mass, Components, and Source Contributions during the Regional Air Pollution Study in St. Louis; Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 4172–4179.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, L.M. Aerosol Organic-Mass-to-Organic-Carbon Ratio Measurements; Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37, 2982–2987.
   Google Scholar
• Countess, R.J.; Wolff, G.T.; Cadle, S.H. The Denver Winter Aerosol: a Comprehensive Chemical Characterization; J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 1980, 30, 1194–1200.
   Google Scholar
• Japar, S.M.; Szkarlat, A.C.; Pierson, W.R. The Determination of the Optical Properties of Airborne Particle Emissions from Diesel Vehicles; Sci. Total Environ. 1984, 36, 121–130.
   Google Scholar
• Turpin, B.J.; Huntzicker, J.J.; Larson, S.M.; Cass, G.R. Los Angeles Summer Midday Particulate Carbon-Primary and Secondary Aerosol; Environ. Sci. Technol. 1991, 25, 1788–1793.
   Google Scholar
• Turpin, B. J.; Lim, H.-J. Species Contribution to PM2.5 Mass Concentrations: Revisiting Common Assumptions for Estimating Organic Mass; Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2001, 35, 602–610.
   Google Scholar
• Bae, M.S.; Schauer, J.J.; Turner, J.R. Estimation of the Monthly Average Ratios of Organic Mass to Organic Carbon for Fine Particulate Matter at an Urban Site; Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 1123–1139.
   Google Scholar
• Paatero, P.; Hopke, P.K.; Begum, B.A.; Biswas, S.W. A Graphical Diagnostic Method for Assessing the Rotation in Factor Analytical Models of Atmospheric Pollution; Atmos. Environ. 2005, 39, 193–201.
   Google Scholar
• Fine, P.M.; Cass, G.R.; Simoneit, B.R.T. Chemical Characterization of Fine Particle Emissions from the Fireplace Combustion of Wood Types Grown in the Midwestern and Western United States; Environ. Eng. Sci. 2004, 21, 387–409.
   Google Scholar
• Poirot, R. Tracers of Opportunity: Potassium; 1998; available at http://capita.wustl.edu/PMFine/Workgroup/SourceAttribution/Reports/In-progress/potass/Kcover.htm (accessed 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Schauer, J.J.; Kleeman, M.J.; Cass, G.R.; Simoneit, B.R.T. Measurement of Emissions from Air Pollution Sources. 3. C1 through C29 Organic Compounds from Fireplace Combustion of Wood; Environ. Sci. Technol. 2001, 35, 1716–1728.
   Google Scholar
• Chinkin, L.R.; Coe, D.L.; Funk, T.H.; Hafner, H.R.; Roberts, P.T.; Ryan, P.A.; Lawson, D.R. Weekday Versus Weekend Activity Patterns for Ozone Precursor Emissions in California’s South Coast Air Basin; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 2003, 53, 829–843.
   Google Scholar
• Blanchard, C.L.; Tanenbaum, S.J. Differences between Weekday and Weekend Air Pollutant Levels in Southern California; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 2003, 53, 816–828.
   Google Scholar
• Bae, M.S.; Schauer, J.J.; DeMinter, J.T.; Turner, J.R. Hourly and Daily Patterns of Particle-Phase Organic and Elemental Carbon Concentrations in the Urban Atmosphere; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 2004, 54, 823–833.
   Google Scholar
• Fujita, E.M.; Campbell, D.E.; Zielinska, B.; Sagebiel, J.C.; Bowen, J.L.; Goliff, W.S.; Stockwell, W.R.; Lawson, D.R. Diurnal and Weekday Variations in the Source Contributions of Ozone Precursors in California’s South Coast Air Basin; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 2003, 53, 844–863.
   Google Scholar
• Marr, L.C.; Harley, R.A. Modeling the Effect of Weekday-Weekend Differences in Motor Vehicle Emissions on Photochemical Air Pollution in Central California; Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36, 4099–4106.
   Google Scholar
• Hammerle, R.H.; Korniski, T.J.; Weir, J.E.; Chladek, E.; Gierczak, C.A.; Chase, R.E.; Hurley, R.E. Effect of Mileage Accumulations on Particulate Emissions from Vehicles Using Gasoline with Methylcyclopentadienyl Manganese Tricarbonyl; Technical Paper No. 920731; Society of Automotive Engineers: Warrendale, PA, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Sisler, J.F. Spatial and Seasonal Patterns and Long-Term Variability of the Composition of the Haze in the United States: an Analysis of Data from the IMPROVE Network; Report Prepared by Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere: Fort Collins, CO, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, P.A.; Moyers, J.L. A Chemical Characterization of Winter-time Haze in Phoenix, Arizona; Atmos. Environ. 1986, 20, 207–213.
   Google Scholar
• Katrinak, K.A.; Anderson, J.R.; Buseck, P.R. Individual Particle Types in the Aerosol of Phoenix, Arizona; Environ. Sci. Technol. 1995, 29, 321–329.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, W.; Hopke, P.K. Source Apportionment for Ambient Particles in the San Gorgonio Wilderness; Atmos. Environ. 2004, 38, 5901–5910.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, E.; Hopke, P.K. Source Apportionment of Fine Particles at Washington, DC, Utilizing Temperature-Resolved Carbon Fractions; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 2004, 54, 773–785.
   Google Scholar
• Chow, J.C.; Watson, J.G.; Kuhns, H.; Etyemezian, V.; Lowenthal, D.H.; Crow, D.; Kohl, S.D.; Engelbrecht, J.P.; Green, M.C. Source Profiles for Industrial, Mobile, and Area Sources in the Big Bend Regional Aerosol Visibility and Observational Study; Chemosphere 2004, 54, 185–208.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, J.G.; Chow, J.C.; Lowenthal, D.H.; Pritchett, L.C.; Frazier, C.A.; Neuroth, G.R.; Robbins, R. Differences in the Carbon Composition of Source Profiles for Diesel- and Gasoline-Powered Vehicles; Atmos. Environ. 1994, 28, 2493–2505.
   Google Scholar
• Hildemann, L.M.; Markowski, G.R.; Cass, G.R. Chemical Composition of Emissions from Urban Sources of Fine Organic Aerosol; Environ. Sci. Technol. 1991, 25, 744–759.
   Google Scholar
• Fine, P.M.; Shen, S.; Sioutas, C. Inferring the Sources of Fine and Ultrafine Particulate Matter at Downwind Receptor Sites in the Los Angeles Basin Using Multiple Continuous Measurements; Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2004, 38, 182–195.
   Google Scholar
• DeMore, W.G.; Sander, S.P.; Golden, D.M.; Hampson, R.F.; Kurylo, M.J.; Howard, C.J.; Ravishankara, A.R.; Kolb, C.E.; Molina, M.J. Chemical Kinetics and Photochemical Data for Use in Stratospheric Modeling; Evaluation No. 11, JRL Publication 94-26; Jet Propulsion Laboratory: Pasadena, CA, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, R.A.; Baulch, D.L.; Cox, R.A.; Hampson, R.F.; Kerr, J.A.; Troe, J. Evaluated Kinetic and Photochemical Data for Atmospheric Chemistry, Supplement IV; J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 1992, 21, 1125–1568.
   Google Scholar
• Ansari, A.S.; Pandis, S.N. Response of Inorganic PM to Precursor Concentrations; Environ. Sci. Technol. 1998, 32, 2706–2714.
   Google Scholar
• Meng, Z.; Dabdub, D.; Seinfeld, J.H. Chemical Coupling between Atmospheric Ozone and Particulate Matter; Science 1997, 227, 116–119.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2002 National Emissions Inventory Data & Documentation (updated October 23, 2006); available at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/net/2002inventory.html (accessed 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Small, M.; Germani, M.S.; Small, A.M.; Zoller, W.H. Airborne Plume Study of Emissions from the Processing of Copper Ores in Southeastern Arizona; Environ. Sci. Technol. 1981, 15, 293–299.
   Google Scholar