Source Identifications of Airborne Fine Particles Using Positive Matrix Factorization and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Positive Matrix Factorization

References

• Mar, T.F.; Norris, G.A.; Koenig, J.Q.; Larson, T.V. Associations between Air Pollution and Mortality in Phoenix; Environ. Health Perspect. 2000, 108, 347–353.
   Google Scholar
• Laden, F.; Neas, L.M.; Dockery, D.W.; Schwartz, J. Association of Fine Particulate Matter from Different Sources with Daily Mortality in Six US Cities; Environ. Health Perspect. 2000, 108, 941–947.
   Google Scholar
• Sarnat, J.A.; Koutrakis, P.; Suh, H. Assessing the Relationship between Personal Particulate and Gaseous Exposures of Senior Citizens Living in Baltimore, MD; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 2000, 50, 1184–1198.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, J.; Laden, F. The Concentration-Response Relationship between PM2 . 5and Daily Deaths; Environ. Health Perspect. 2002, 110, 1025–1029.
   Google Scholar
• Dominici, F.; Zanoetti, A.; Zeger, S.L.; Schwartz, J.; Samet, J.M. Hierarchical Bivariate Time Series Models: a Combined Analysis of the Effects of Particulate Matter on Morbidity and Mortality; Biostatistics 2004, 5, 341–360.
   Google Scholar
• Paatero, P. Least Square Formulation of Robust Non-Negative Factor Analysis; Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Systems 1997, 37, 23–35.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, S.; Rahn, K.A.; Arimoto, R. Testing and Optimization Two Factor-Analysis Techniques on Aerosol at Narragansett, Rhode Island; Atmos. Environ. 1999, 33, 2169–2185.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, R.D. Workshop on UNMIX and PMF as Applied to PM2.5 ; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, 2000; pp 2493–2505.
   Google Scholar
• Qin, Y.; Oduyemi, K.; Chan, L.Y. Comparative Testing of PMF and CFA Models; Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Systems 2002, 61, 75–87.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, E.; Hopke, P.K.; Larson, T.V.; Covert, D.S. Analysis of Ambient Particle Size Distributions Using Positive Matrix Factorization and Unmix; Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38, 202–209.
   Google Scholar
• Xie, Y.L.; Hopke, P.K.; Paatero, P.; Barrie, L.A.; Li, S.M. Identification of Source Nature and Seasonal Variations of Arctic Aerosol by Positive Matrix Factorization; J. Atmos. Sci. 1999, 56, 249–260.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, E.; Chun, C.K.; Paatero, P. Application of Positive Matrix Factorization in Source Apportionment of Particulate Pollutants; Atmos. Environ. 1999, 33, 3201–3212.
   Google Scholar
• Chueinta, W.; Hopke, P.K.; Paatero, P. Investigation of Sources of Atmospheric Aerosol at Urban and Suburban Residential Area in Thailand by Positive Matrix Factorization; Atmos. Environ. 2000, 34, 3319–3329.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, P.H.; Brook, J.; Zynska, E.-Z.; Mabury, S. Identification of the Major Sources Contributing to PM2 . 5Observed in Toronto; Environ.Sci. Technol. 2003, 37, 4831–4840.
   Google Scholar
• Hien, P.D.; Bac, V.T.; Thinh, N.T.H. Investigation of Sulfate and Nitrate Formation on Mineral Dust Particles by Receptor Modeling; Atmos. Environ. 2005, 39, 7231–7239.
   Google Scholar
• Ramadan, Z.; Song, X.H.; Hopke, P.K. Identification of Sources of Phoenix Aerosol by Positive Matrix Factorization; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 2000, 50, 1308–1320.
   Google Scholar
• Polissar, A.V.; Hopke, P.K.; Poirot, R.L. Atmospheric Aerosol over Vermont: Chemical Composition and Sources; Environ. Sci. Technol. 2001, 35, 4604–4621.
   Google Scholar
• Song, X.H.; Polissar, A.V.; Hopke, P.K. Source of Fine Particle Composition in the Northeastern US; Atmos. Environ. 2001, 35, 5277–5286.
   Google Scholar
• Maykut, N.N.; Lewtas, J.; Kim, E.; Larson, T.V. Source Apportionment of PM2.5at an Urban IMPROVE Site in Seattle, WA; Environ. Sci.Technol. 2003, 37, 5135–5142.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, E.; Hopke, P.K. Source Apportionment of Fine Particles at Washington, DC Utilizing Temperature Resolved Carbon Fractions; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 2004; 54, 773–785.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, E.; Hopke, P.K;. Identification of Fine Particle Sources in Mid- Atlantic US Area; Water Air Soil Pollut. 2005, 168, 391–421.
   Google Scholar
• Paatero, P. The Multilinear Engine—a Table Driven, Least Square Program for Solving Multilinear Problems, Including the N-Way Parallel Factor Analysis Model; J. Comput. Graphic. Stat. 1999, 8, 854–888.
   Google Scholar
• Ramadan, Z.; Eickhout, B.; Song, X.H.; Buydens, L.; Hopke, P.K. Comparison of Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) and Multilinear Engine (ME-2) for the Source Apportionment of Particulate Pollutants; Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Systems 2003, 66, 15–28.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, E.; Hopke, P.K.; Larson, T.V.; Maykut, N.N.; Lewtas, J. Factor Analysis of Seattle Fine Particles; Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2004, 38, 724–738.
   Google Scholar
• Yli-Tuomi, T.; Hopke, P.K.; Paatero, P.; Basumia, M.S.; Landsberger, S.L.; Viisanen, Y.; Paatero, J. Atmospheric Aerosol over Finnish Arctic: Source Analysis by the Multilinear Engine and the Potential Source Contribution Function; Atmos. Environ. 2003, 37, 4381–4392.
   Google Scholar
• Paatero, P.; Hopke, P.K. Utilizing Wind Direction and Wind Speed as Independent Variables in Multilinear Receptor Modeling Studies; Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Systems 2002, 60, 25–41.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, E.; Hopke, P.K.; Paatero, P.; Edgerton, E.S. Incorporation of Parametric Factors into Multilinear Receptor Model Studies of Atlanta Aerosol; Atmos. Environ. 2003, 37, 5009–5021.
   Google Scholar
• Eberly, S. EPA PMF Version 1.1 (Beta Version); 2005; available at http://www.epa.gov/heasd/products/pmf/pmf.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Birch, M.E.; Cary, R.A. Elemental Carbon-Based Method for Monitoring Occupational Exposures to Particulate Diesel Exhaust; Aerosol Sci. Technol. 1996, 25, 221–241.
   Google Scholar
• RTI. Quality Assurance Projects Plan Chemical Speciation of PM2.5Filter Samples; available at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/files/ambient/pm25/spec/rtiqap.pdf (accessed 2004).
   Google Scholar
• Tolocka, M.P.; Solomon, P.A.; Mitchell, W.; Norris, G.A.; Gemmill, D.B.; Wiener, R.W.; Vanderpool, R.W.; Homolya, J.B.; Rice, J. East Versus West in the US: Chemical Characteristics of PM2 . 5during the Winter of 1999; Aerosol Sci. Technol. 1999, 34, 88–96.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, E.; Hopke, P.K.; Qin, Y. Estimation of Organic Carbon Blank Values and Error Structures of the Speciation Trends Network Data for Source Apportionments; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 2005, 55, 1190–1199.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, E.; Hopke, P.K.; Edgerton, E.S. Source Identification of Atlanta Aaerosol by Positive Matrix Factorization; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 2003, 53, 731–739.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, R.C. Current Factor Analysis Models Are Ill-Posed; Atmos. Environ. 1987, 21, 1815–1820.
   Google Scholar
• Paatero, P.; Hopke, P.K. Discarding or Downweighting High-Noise Variables in Factor Analytic Models; Anal. Chim. Acta 2003, 490, 277–289.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, R.C. Multivariate Receptor Modeling by N Dimensional Edge Detection. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Systems 2003, 65,179–189.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, C.L.; Hanson, R.J. Solving Least Square Problems; Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, D.; Hopke, P.K. The Use of Constrained Least-Squares to Solve the Chemical Mass Balance Problem; Atmos. Environ. 1989, 23, 2143–2150.
   Google Scholar