Fine Particulate Matter Emissions Inventories: Comparisons of Emissions Estimates with Observations from Recent Field Programs

References

• McMurry, P.H.; Shepherd, M.F.; Vickery, J.S., Eds.; Particulate Matter Science for Policy Makers: a NARSTO Assessment; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, U.K., 2004.
   Google Scholar
• NARSTO. Improving Emission Inventories for Effective Air Quality Management across North America; NARSTO-05-001; August 2005; available at http://www.cgenv.com/Narsto/ (accessed 2007).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Background Information on the PM Supersite Program, 2000; available at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/supersites.html (accessed 2007).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Factor Information Retrieval Data System; available at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/software/fire/index.html (accessed 2007).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. AP 42, Fifth Edition Compilation of Air Pollution Emission Factors, Volume 1: Stationary Point and Area Sources, 1995; available at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ (accessed 2007).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Locating and Estimating Air Toxic Emissions; available at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/le/ (accessed 2007).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. SPECIATE Database; available at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/software/speciate/index.html (accessed 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Hopke, P.K.; Gladney, E.S.; Gordon, G.E.; Zoller, W.H.; Jones, A.G. The Use of Multivariate Analysis to Identify Sources of Selected Elements in Boston Urban Aerosol; Atmos. Environ. 1976, 10, 1015–1025.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, G.E. Receptor Models; Environ. Sci. Technol. 1980, 14, 792–800.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, L.; Kim, E.; Hopke, P.K.; Stanier, C.O. Advanced Factor Analysis on Pittsburgh Particle Size-Distribution Data. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2004, 38 (S1), 118–132.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, E.; Hopke, P.; Edgerton, E. Improving Source Identification of Atlanta Aerosol Using Temperature Resolved Carbon Fraction in Positive Matrix Factorization; Atmos. Environ. 2004, 38, 3349–3362.
   Google Scholar
• Maykut, N. Source Apportionment of PM2.5 at an Urban IMPROVE Site in Seattle, Washington; Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37, 5135–5142.
   Google Scholar
• Schauer, J.J.; Fraser, M.P.; Cass, G.R.; Simoneit, B.R.T. Source Reconciliation of Atmospheric Gas Phase and Particulate Phase Pollutants during a Severe Photochemical Smog Episode; Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36, 3806–3814.
   Google Scholar
• Schauer, J.; Cass, G. Source Apportionment of Wintertime Gas-Phase and Particle-Phase Air Pollutants Using Organic Compounds as Tracers; Environ. Sci. Technol. 2000, 34, 1821–1832.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, M.; Cass, G.; Schauer, J.; Edgerton, E. Source Ppportionment of PM2.5 in the Southeaster United States Using Solvent-Extractable Organic Compounds as Tracers; Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36, 2361–2371.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. State and Federal Standards for Mobile Source Emissions; The National Academy Press: Washington, DC, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. 1997 Vehicle Inventory and Use Survey; available at http://www.census.gov/svsd/www/vius/products.html (accessed 2007).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. National Air Quality and Emissions Trends Report, 2003 Special Studies Edition; EPA 454/R-03-005, September 2003; available at http://www.epa.gov/air/airtrends/aqtrnd03/ (accessed 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, M.P.; Cass, G.R.; Simoneit, B.R. Gas-Phase and Particle-Phase Organic Compounds Emitted from Motor Vehicle Traffic in a Los Angeles Roadway Tunnel; Environ. Sci. Technol. 1998, 32, 2051–2060.
   Google Scholar
• McGaughey, G.R.; Desai, N.R.; Allen, D.T.; Seila, R.L.; Lonneman, W.A.; Fraser, M.P.; Harley, R.; Ivy, J.M.; Price, J.H. Analysis of Motor Vehicle Emissions in a Houston Tunnel during the Texas Air Quality Study 2000; Atmos. Environ. 2004, 38, 3363–3372.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, M.P.; Lakshmanan, K.; Fritz, S.G.; Ubanwa, B. Variation in Composition of Fine Particulate Emissions from Heavy-Duty Diesel Vehicles; J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2002, 107, 8346.
   Google Scholar
• Kirchstetter, T.; Harley, R.; Kreisberg, N.; Stoltzenburg, M.; Hering, S. On-Road Measurement of Fine Particle and Nitrogen Oxide Emissions from Light- and Heavy-Duty Vehicles; Atmos. Environ. 1999, 33, 2955–2968.
   Google Scholar
• Miguel, A.; Kirchstetter, T.; Harley, R.; Hering, S. On-Road Emissions of Particulate Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Black Carbon from Gasoline and Diesel Vehicles; Environ. Sci. Technol. 1998, 32, 450–455.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. Modeling Mobile Source Emissions; National Academy Press: Washington, DC, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, W.R.; Gertler, A.W.; Robinson, N.F.; Sagebiel, J.C.; Zielinska, B.; Bishop, G.A.; Stedman, D.H.; Zweidinger, R.B.; Ray, W.D. Real-World Automotive Emissions—Summary of Recent Tunnel Studies in the Fort McHenry and Tuscarora Mountain Tunnels; Atmos. Environ. 1996, 30, 2233–2256.
   Google Scholar
• Cicero-Fernandez, P.; Long, J.R.; Winer, A.M. Effects of Grade and Other Loads on On-Road Emissions of Hydrocarbons and Carbon Monoxide; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 1997, 47, 898–904.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. MOBILE 6.1 Particulate Emission Factor Model Technical Description, Final Report; EPA420-R-03-001, January 2003; available at http://www.epa.gov/otaq/models/mobile6/r03001.pdf (accessed 2007).
   Google Scholar
• California Air Resource Board. California Air Resource Board’s Emissions Inventory Series: EMFAC2002 the Latest Update to the On-Road Emissions Inventory; September 2002; available at http://www.arb.ca.gov/msei/on-road/briefs/2002.pdf (accessed 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Pokharel, S.; Bishop, G.; Stedman, D. An On-Road Motor Vehicle Emissions Inventory for Denver: an Efficient Alternative to Modeling; Atmos. Environ. 2002, 36, 5177–5184.
   Google Scholar
• Dreher, D.; Harley, R. A Fuel-Based Inventory for Heavy-Duty Diesel Truck Emissions; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 1998, 48, 352–358.
   Google Scholar
• Cha, S.; Carter, P.; Bradow, R. Simulation of Automobile Brake Wear Dynamics and Estimation of Emissions; SAE Trans. 1983, Paper 831036.
   Google Scholar
• Bhagwan, G.; Cadle, S.; Mulawa, P.; Groblicki, P. Brake Wear Particulate Matter Emissions; Environ. Sci. Technol. 2000, 34, 4463–4469.
   Google Scholar
• Abu-Allaban, M.; Gillies, J.; Gertler, A.; Clayton, R.; Proffitt, D. Tailpipe, Resuspended Road Dust, and Brake-Wear Emission Factors from On-Road Vehicles; Atmos. Environ. 2003, 37, 5283–5293.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics. Transportation Statistics Annual Report; Washington, DC, 2004; available at http://www.bts.gov/publications/transportation_statistics_ annual_report/2004/pdf/entire.pdf (accessed 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T.; Biswas, S;. Fine, P.M.; Geller, M.; Sioutas, C. Physical and Chemical Characteristics and Volatility of PM in the Proximity of a Light-Duty Vehicle Freeway; Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 347–357.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, Y.; Hinds, W.; Shen, S.; Sioutas, C. Seasonal and Spatial Trends in Fine Particulate Matter. Seasonal Trends of Concentration and Size Distribution of Ultrafine Particles near Major Highways in Los Angeles; Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2004, 38, 5–13.
   Google Scholar
• Schauer, J.J.; Kleeman, M.J.; Cass, G.R.; Simoneit, B.R.T. Measurement of Emissions from Air Pollution Sources. 5. C1–C32 Organic Compounds from Gasoline-Powered Motor Vehicles; Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36, 1169–1180.
   Google Scholar
• Cadle, S.; Mulawa, P.; Hunsanger, E.; Nelson, K.; Ragazzi, R.; Barrett, R.; Gallagher, G.; Lawson, D.; Knapp, K.; Snow, R. Composition of Light-Duty Motor Vehicle Exhaust Particulate Matter in the Denver, Colorado Area; Environ. Sci. Technol. 1999, 33, 2328–2339.
   Google Scholar
• Cadle, S.; Mulawa, P.; Hunsanger, E.; Nelson, K.; Ragazzi, R.; Barrett, R.; Gallagher, G.; Lawson, D.; Knapp, K.; Snow, R. Light-Duty Vehicle Exhaust Particulate Matter Measurement in the Denver, Colorado Area; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 1999, 49, PM-164–PM–174.
   Google Scholar
• Gillies, J.; Gertler, A.; Sagebiel, J.; Dippel, W. On-Road Particulate Matter (PM2.5 and PM10) Emissions in the Sepulveda Tunnel, Los Angeles, California; Environ. Sci. Technol. 2001, 35, 1054–1063.
   Google Scholar
• Giugliano, M.; Lonati, G.; Butelli, P.; Romele, L.; Tardivo, R.; Grosso, M. Fine Particulate (PM2.5–PM10) at Urban Sites with Different Traffic Exposure; Atmos. Environ. 2005, 39, 2421–2431.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, S.; Cocker, D., III; Miller, W.; Norbeck, J. Emission Rates of Particulate Matter and Elemental and Organic Carbon from In-Use Diesel Engines; Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38, 2544–2550.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. MOBILE 6 Vehicle Emission Modeling Software, 2005; available at http://www.epa.gov/otaq/m6.htm (accessed 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Morawska, L.; Bofinger, N.D.; Kocis, L.; Nwankwoala, A. Submicrometer and Supermicrometer Particles from Diesel Vehicle Emissions; Environ. Sci. Technol. 1998, 32, 2033–2042.
   Google Scholar
• Ristovski, Z.D.; Morawska, L.; Bofinger, N.D.; Hitchins, J. Submicrometer and Supermicrometer Particulate Emission from Spark Ignition Vehicles; Environ. Sci. Technol. 1998, 32, 3845–3852.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Air Data; available at http://www.epa.gov/air/data/geosel.html (accessed 2007).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. EPA Documentation for the Nonroad Model Criteria Air Pollutant Component of the National Emissions Inventory (NEI) for Base Years 1970–2001; Prepared by E.H. Pechan and Associates, Inc.: Durham, NC, 2005; available at ftp://ftp.epa.gov/EmisInventory/finalnei99ver3/criteria/documentation/non-road/nonroad_neimethods.pdf (accessed 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Alander, T.; Antikainen, E.; Raunemaa, T.; Elonen, E.; Rautiola, A.; Torkkell, K. Particle Emissions from a Small Two-Stroke Engine: Effects of Fuel, Lubricating Oil, and Exhaust after Treatment on Particle Characteristics; Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 151–161.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, A.; Westerholm, R. Measurement of Regulated and Unregulated Exhaust Emissions from a Lawn Mower with and without an Oxidizing Catalyst: a Comparison of Two Different Fuels; Environ. Sci. Technol. 2001, 35, 2166–2170.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. EPA Aircraft, Commercial Marine Vessel, Locomotive, and Other Nonroad Components, Volume I: Methodology; Prepared by Eastern Research Group: Morrisville, NC, 2003; available at ftp://ftp.epa.gov/pub/EmisInventory/finalnei99ver3/criteria/documentation/nonroad/99nonroad_vol1_oct2003.pdf (accessed 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Corbett, J. Emissions from Ships in the Northwestern United States; Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36, 1299–1306.
   Google Scholar
• Corbett, J.; Koehler, H. Updated Emissions from Ocean Shipping; J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2003, 108, 148–227, 9–1–9–13.
   Google Scholar
• Eastern Research Group Inc. and Starcrest Consulting Group, LLC. Development of a Revised Emissions Inventory for Construction Equipment in the Houston-Galveston Ozone Non-Attainment Area, Final Report. Prepared for the Houston-Galveston Area Council and the TNRCC Area and Mobile Source Emissions Assessment Section, April 2000; available at http://www.tceq.state.tx.us/assets/public/implementation/air/sip/sipdocs/2000-12-HGB/00011sipapb_ado.pdf (accessed 2007).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Seasonal and Monthly Activity Allocation Fractions for Non-Road Engine Emissions Model; EPA420-P-04-004, April 2004; available at http://www.epa.gov/otaq/models/nonrdmdl/nonrdmdl2004/420p04004.pdf (accessed 2007).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Weekday and Weekend Day Temporal Allocation of Activity in the Draft NONROAD2004 Model; EPA420-P-04-015, April 2004; available at http://www.epa.gov/otaq/models/nonrdmdl/nonrdmdl2004/420p04015.pdf (accessed 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Liang, F.; Lu, M.; Keener, T.; Liu, Z.; Khang, S. The Organic Composition of Diesel Particulate Matter, Diesel Fuel and Engine Oil of a Non-Road Diesel Generator; J. Environ. Monit. 2005, 7, 983–988.
   Google Scholar
• Magnusson, R.; Nilsson, C.; Andersson, K.; Andersson, B.; Gieling, R.; Wiberg, K.; Ostman, C.; Rannug, U. Determination of Chemical Composition and Mutagenicity in Particles from Chainsaw Exhaust. Experimental Set-Up, Stability and Results from Two Different Fuels; Environ. Technol. 2000, 21, 819–829.
   Google Scholar
• Vickery, J. Conceptual Models of PM for North American Regions; In Particulate Matter Science for Policy Makers, a NARSTO Assessment Part 2; 2003, Chapter 10. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, U.K., 2004.
   Google Scholar
• AIRS Database; April 12, 2001. In Federal Reference Method Summaries. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• AIRS Database: Speciation Data; April 2001. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC (as cited in Ref. 59, NARSTO Assessment).
   Google Scholar
• AIRS Database; May 9, 2001. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC (as cited in Ref. 59, NARSTO Assessment).
   Google Scholar
• Mysliwiec, M.; Kleeman, M. Source Apportionment of Secondary Airborne Particulate Matter in a Polluted Atmosphere; Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36, 5376–5384.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, M.P.; Yue, Z.W.; Buzcu, B. Source Apportionment of Fine Particulate Matter in Houston, TX, Using Organic Molecular Markers; Atmos. Environ. 2003, 37, 2117–2123.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, C.A.; Norris, G.A.; Conner, T.L.; Henry, R.C. Source Apportionment of Phoenix PM2.5 Aerosol with the Unmix Receptor Model; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 2003, 53, 325–338.
   Google Scholar
• California Air Resource Board. Bay Area Air Quality Management District Source Methodology for Commercial Charbroiling and Deep Fat Frying Emissions, 2001; available at http://www.arb.ca.gov/ei/areasrc/districtmeth/BayArea/99SS029.pdf (accessed 2007).
   Google Scholar
• California Air Resource Board. Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District Source Methodology for Commercial Charbroiling and Deep Fat Frying Emission, 2002; available at http://www.arb.ca.gov/ei/areasrc/districtmeth/Sac/AS_COOK02_690.pdf (accessed 2007).
   Google Scholar
• California Air Resources Board. Top 25 Emissions Report; available at http://www.arb.ca.gov/app/emsinv/t25cat/cat_top25.php (accessed 2007) and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. National Emissions Inventory for Commercial Cooking, 2004; available at http://www.epa.gov/ttnchie1/conference/ei13/pointarea/roe.pdf (accessed 2007).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Documentation for the Draft 2002 Nonpoint Source National Emission Inventory for Criteria and Hazardous Air Pollutants (March 2005 version); EPA Contract No. 68-D-02-063; Prepared by E.H. Pechan and Associates: Durham, NC, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Kleeman, M.; Schauer, J.; Cass, G. Size and Composition Distribution of Fine Particulate Matter Emitted from Wood Burning, Meat Char-broiling, and Cigarettes; Environ. Sci. Technol. 1999, 33, 3516–3523.
   Google Scholar
• Hildemann, L.; Markowski, G.; Cass, G. Chemical Composition of Emissions from Urban Sources of Fine Organic Aerosol; Environ. Sci. Technol. 1991, 25, 744–759.
   Google Scholar
• Schauer, J.; Kleeman, M.; Cass, G.; Simoneit, B. Measurement of Emissions from Air Pollution Sources. 1. C1–C20 Organic Compounds from Meat Charbroiling; Environ. Sci. Technol. 1999, 33, 1566–1577.
   Google Scholar
• Schauer, J.; Kleeman, M.; Cass, G.; Simoneit, B. Measurement of Emissions from Air Pollution Sources. 4. C1–C27 Organic Compounds from Cooking with Seed Oils; Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36, 567–575.
   Google Scholar
• Schauer, J.; Kleeman, M.; Cass, G.; Simoneit, B. Measurement of Emissions from Air Pollution Sources. 3. C1–C29 Organic Compounds from Fireplace Combustion of Wood; Environ. Sci. Technol. 2001, 35, 1716–1728.
   Google Scholar
• Rogge, W.; Hildemann, L.; Mazurek, M.; Cass, G. Sources of Fine Organic Aerosol. 9. Pine, Oak, Synthetic Log Combustion in Residential Fireplaces; Environ. Sci. Technol. 1998, 32, 12–22.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, A.; Fraser, M.; Anderson, S.; Allen, D.T. Air Pollution Emissions Associated with Forest, Grassland and Agricultural Burning in Texas; Atmos. Environ. 2002, 36, 3779–3792.
   Google Scholar
• Wiedinmyer, C.; Quayle, B.; Geron, C.; Belote, A.; McKenzie, D.; Zhang, X.; O’Niell, S.O.; Wynne, K.K. Estimating Emissions from Fires in North America for Air Quality Modeling; Atmos. Environ. 2006, 40, 3419–3432.
   Google Scholar
• Junquera, V.; Russell, M.M.; Vizuete, W.; Kimura, Y.; Allen, D. Wild-fires in Eastern Texas in August and September 2000: Emissions, Aircraft Measurements and Impact on Photochemistry; Atmos. Environ. 2005, 39, 4983–4996.
   Google Scholar
• MODIS Fire and Thermal Anomalies Guide; Louis Giglio, Science Systems and Applications Inc., Lanham, MD; available at http://modis-fire.umd.edu/MOD14.asp (accessed 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Giglio, L.; Descloitres, J.; Justice, C.O.; Kaufman, Y.J. An Enhanced Contextual Fire Detection Algorithm for MODIS; Remote Sensing Environ. 2003, 87, 273–282.
   Google Scholar
• Mendoza, A.; Garcia, M.R.; Vela, P.; Lozano, D.F.; Allen, D. Trace Gases and Particulate Matter Emissions from Wildfires and Agricultural Burning in Northeastern Mexico during the 2000 Fire Season; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 2005, 55, 1797–1808.
   Google Scholar
• Mullet, I. Comparison of Satellite Estimates and Incident Reports of Fires; University of Texas; in preparation.
   Google Scholar
• Hays, M.D.; Geron, C.D.; Linna, K.J.; Smith, D.; Schauer, J.J. Speciation of Gas-Phase and Fine Particulate Matter Emissions from Burning of Foliar Fuels; Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36, 2281–2295.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, P.K.; Murphy, D.M.; Cziczo, D.J.; Thomson, D.S.; de Gouw, J.A.; Warneke, C.; Holloway, J.; Jost, H.-J.; Hubler, G. Biomass-Burning Particle Measurements: Characteristic Composition and Chemical Processing; J. Geophys. Res. 2005, 109, D23S27.
   Google Scholar
• Etyemezian, V.; Kuhns, H.; Gillies, J.; Chow, J.; Hendrickson, K.; McGown, M.; Pitchford, M. Vehicle-Based Road Dust Emission Measurement (III): Effect of Speed, Traffic Volume, Location, and Season on PM10 Road Dust Emissions in the Treasure Valley, ID; Atmos. Environ. 2003, 37, 4583–4593.
   Google Scholar
• Carvacho, O.; Ashbaugh, L.; Brown, M.; Flocchini, R. Relationship between San Joaquin Valley Soil Texture and PM10 Emissions Potential Using the UC Davis Dust Resuspension Test Chamber; Trans. ASAE 2001, 44, 1603–1608.
   Google Scholar
• Gillies, J.; Etyemezian, V.; Kuhns, H.; Nikolic, D.; Gillette, D. Effect of Vehicle Characteristics on Unpaved Road Dust Emissions; Atmos. Environ. 2005, 39, 2341–2347.
   Google Scholar
• Kinsey, J.; Linna, K.; Squier, W.; Muleski, G.; Cowherd, C., Jr. Characterization of the Fugitives Particle Emissions from Construction Mud/Dirt Carryout; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 2004, 54, 1394–1404.
   Google Scholar
• Morey, J.; Niemeier, D.; Limanond, T. Statistical Framework Using GIS to Estimate Unpaved Road Vehicle Miles Traveled for PM10 Emissions Inventories; J. Urban Plan. Dev. 2004, 130, 2, 83–93.
   Google Scholar
• Kidwell, C.; Ondov, J. Elemental Analysis of Sub-Hourly Ambient Aerosol Collections; Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2004, 38, 205–218.
   Google Scholar
• Vega, E.; Mugica, V.; Reyes, E.; Sanchez, G.; Chow, J.; Watson, J. Chemical Composition of Fugitive Dust Emitters in Mexico City; Atmos. Environ. 2001, 35, 4033–4029.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, K.; Lee, S.; Chow, J.; Watson, J. Characterization of the PM10 and PM2.5 Source Profiles for Fugitive Dust in Hong Kong; Atmos. Environ. 2003, 37, 1023–1032.
   Google Scholar
• Rogge, W.; Medeiros, P.; Simoneit, B. Organic Marker Compounds for Surface Soil and Fugitive Dust from Open Lot Dairies and Cattle Feedlots; Atmos. Environ. 2006, 40, 27–29.
   Google Scholar
• Etyemezian, V.; Ahonen, S.; Djordje, N.; Gillette, D.; Veranth, J. Deposition and Removal of Fugitive Dust in the Arid Southwest United States: Measurements and Model Results; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 2004, 54, 1099–1111.
   Google Scholar
• Malm, W.; Schichtel, B.; Pitchford, M.; Ashbaugh, L.; Eldred, R. Spatial and Monthly Trends in Speciated Fine Particle Concentrations in the United States; J. Geophys. Res. 2004, 109, D03306.
   Google Scholar
• Countess, R.J.; Barnard, W.R.; Claiborn, C.S.; Gillette, D.A.; Latimer, D.A.; Pace, T.G.; Watson, J.G. Methodology for Estimating Fugitive Windblown and Mechanically Resuspended Road Dust Emissions Applicable for Regional Scale Air Quality Modeling; Report No. 30203-9; Western Regional Air Partnership: Denver, CO, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Veranth, J.; Seshadri, G.; Pardyjak, E. Vehicle-Generated Fugitive Dust Transport: Analytic Models and Field Study; Atmos. Environ. 2003, 37, 2295–2303.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Titles and Documentation for PM Profiles, 2005; available at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/emch/speciation/index.html (accessed 2007).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Recommendations for the Update and Improvement of Existing PM2.5 Split Factors; Memo from Pacific Environmental Services to the EPA Emissions Factor and Inventory Group, 2003; available at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/emch/speciation/PM_2.5split_task2_finalmemo.pdf (accessed 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Carnegie Mellon University. CMU Ammonia Inventory for the United States; available at www.cmu.edu/ammonia (accessed 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Gilliland, A.B.; Appel, K.W.; Pinder, R.W.; Dennis, R.L. Seasonal NH3 Emissions for the Continental United States: Inverse Model Estimation and Evaluation; Atmos. Environ. 2006, 40, 4986–4998.
   Google Scholar
• Corsi, R.L.; Kinney K.A.; McDonald-Buller E.; Banks J.A.; Sarwar G. Net Ammonia Emissions from Pine and Oak Forests in Texas; Prepared for Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission: Austin, TX, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Corsi, R.; Banks J.; Kinney K.; Sarwar, M.G. Non-Point Source Emissions in Texas: Estimation Methods, Pitfalls, Corrections, and Comparisons; Prepared for Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission, Austin, TX, Work Order No. 9880077600-14, May 2002.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. Air Emissions from Animal Feeding Operations, Current Knowledge, Future Needs; The National Academy Press: Washington, DC, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. The Scientific Basis for Estimating Air Emissions from Animal Feeding Operations, Interim Report; The National Academy Press: Washington, DC, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Goebes, M.D.; Strader, R.; Davidson, C. An Ammonia Emission Inventory for Fertilizer Application in the United States; Atmos. Environ. 2003, 37, 2539–2550.
   Google Scholar
• Sarwar, G.; Corsi, R.L.; Kinney, K.A.; Banks, J.A.; Torres, V.M.; Schmidt, C. Measurements of Ammonia Emissions from Oak and Pine Forests and Development of a Non-Industrial Ammonia Emissions Inventory in Texas; Atmos. Environ. 2005, 39, 7137–7153.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, C.M. Influence of Vegetation Types on the Intensity of Ammonia and Nitrogen Dioxide Liberation from Soil; Soil Biol. Biochem. 1973, 5, 163–166.
   Google Scholar
• Gharib, S.; Cass, G.R. Ammonia Emissions in the South Coast Air Basin 1982; Open File Report 84-2; Environmental Quality Laboratory, California Institute of Technology: Pasadena, CA, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Camire, C.; Bernier, B;. Retention de l’Azote et Evolution des Prop-prietes d’un Humus Brut de Station de pin Gris Apres Application d’Engrais Azotes; Can. J. Forest Res. 1981, 11, 51–61.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, V.G;. DeBell, D.S. Comparison of Four Methods of Measuring Volatilization Losses of Nitrogen Following Urea Fertilization of Forest Soil; Can. J. Soil Sci. 1980, 60, 549–563.
   Google Scholar
• Overrein, L.N. Lysimeter Studies on Tracer Nitrogen in Forest Soil: I Nitrogen Losses from Leaching and Volatilization after Addition of Urea-N; Soil Sci. 1968, 106, 280–290.
   Google Scholar
• Langford, A.O.; Fehsenfeld, F.C.; Zachariassen, J.; Schimel, D.S. Gaseous Ammonia Fluxes and Background Concentrations in Terrestrial Ecosystems of the United States; Global Biochem. Cycles 1992, 6, 459–483.
   Google Scholar
• Mansell, G.E.; Chitjan, M. An Improved Ammonia Inventory for the Wrap Domain; WRAP Emissions Forum, 2003. Prepared for the Western Governors’ Association, Denver, CO; available at http://pah.cert.ucr.edu/aqm/308/emissions_reports04.shtml (accessed 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Pavlovic, R.T., Nopmongcol, U., Kimura, Y., Allen, D.T. Ammonia Emissions, Concentrations and Implications for Particulate Matter Formation in Houston, Texas; Atmos. Environ. 2006, 40, S538–S551.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, D.T.; Fraser, M.P. An Overview of the Gulf Coast Aerosol Research and Characterization Study: the Houston Fine Particulate Matter Supersite; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 2006, 56, 456–466.
   Google Scholar
• Buzcu, B.; Yue, Z.W.; Fraser, M.P.; Nopmongcol, U.; Allen, D.T. Secondary Particle Formation and Evidence of Heterogeneous Chemistry during a Wood Smoke Episode in Texas; J. Geophys. Res. 2006, 111, D10S13.
   Google Scholar
• Yue, Z. W.; Fraser, M.P. Polar Organic Compounds Measured in Fine Particulate Matter during TexAQS 2000; Atmos. Environ. 2004, 38, 3253–3261.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, E.; Hopke, P.; Edgerton, E. Source Identification of Atlanta Aerosol by Positive Matrix Factorization; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 2003, 53, 731–739.
   Google Scholar
• Marmur, A.; Unal, A.; Mulholland, J.; Russell, A. Optimization-Based Source Apportionment of PM2.5 Incorporating Gas-to-Particle Ratios; Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 3245–3254.
   Google Scholar
• Marmur, A.; Park, S.-K.; Mulholland, J.; Tolbert, P.; Russell, A. SourceApportionment of PM2.5 in the Southeastern United States Using Receptor and Emissions-Based Models: Conceptual Differences and Implications for Time-Series Health Studies; Atmos. Environ. 2006, 40, 2533–2551.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, E.; Hopke, P.; Paatero, P.; Edgerton, E. Incorporation of Parametric Factors into Multilinear Receptor Model Studies of Atlanta Aerosol; Atmos. Environ. 2003, 37, 5009–5021.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, W.; Wang, Y.; Russell, A.; Edgerton, E. Atmospheric Aerosol over Two Urban-Rural Pairs in the Southeastern United States: Chemical Composition and Possible Sources; Atmos. Environ. 2005, 39, 4453–4470.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, L.-W. A.; Doddridge, B.G.; Dickerson, R.R.; Chow, J.C.; Henry, R.C. Origins of Fine Aerosol Mass in the Baltimore-Washington Corridor: Implications from Observation, Factor Analysis, and Ensemble Air Parcel Back Trajectories; Atmos. Environ. 2002, 36, 4541–4554.
   Google Scholar
• Song, X.-H.; Polissar, A.V.; Hopke, P.K. Sources of Fine Particle Composition in the Northeastern US; Atmos. Environ. 2001, 35, 5277–5286.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, E.; Hopke, P.K. Source Apportionment of Fine Particles in Washington, DC, Utilizing Temperature-Resolved Carbon Fractions; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 2004, 54, 773–785.
   Google Scholar
• Begum, B.A.; Hopke, P.K.; Zhao, W. Source Identification of Fine Particles in Washington, DC, by Expanded Factor Analysis Modeling; Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 1129–1137.
   Google Scholar
• Ogulei, D.; Hopke, P.K.; Zhou, L.; Paatero, P.; Park, S.S.; Ondov, J.M. Receptor Modeling for Multiple Time Resolved Species: the Baltimore Supersite; Atmos. Environ. 2005, 39, 3751–3762.
   Google Scholar
• Suarez, A.E.; Ondov, J.M. Ambient Aerosol Concentrations of Elements Resolved by Size and Source: Contributions of Some Cytokine-Active Metals from Coal- and Oil-Fired Power Plants; Energy Fuels 2002, 16, 562–568.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, W. Chemical Mass Balance Analysis of Air Quality Data When Unknown Pollution Sources Are Present; Atmos. Environ. 2004, 38, 4305–4317.
   Google Scholar
• Magliano, K.L.; Ranzier, A.J.; Solomon, P.A.; Watson, J.G. Chemical Mass Balance Modeling of Data from the 1995 Integrated Monitoring Study; Prepared for the California Regional PM10/PM2.5 Air Quality Study by California Air Resources Board: Sacramento, CA, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Held, T.; Ying, Q.; Kleeman, M.J.; Schauer, J.J.; Fraser, M.P. A Comparison of the UCD/CIT Air Quality Model and the CMB Source-Receptor Model for Primary Airborne Particulate Matter; Atmos. Environ. 2005, 39, 2281–2297.
   Google Scholar
• Schauer, J.J.; Rogge, W.F.; Hildemann, L.M.; Maurek, M.A.; Cass, G.R.; Simoneit, B.R.T. Source Apportionment of Airborne Particulate Matter Using Organic Compounds as Tracers; Atmos. Environ. 1996, 30, 3837–3855.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, W.; Hopke, P.K. Source Apportionment for Ambient Paritcles in the San Gorgonio Wilderness; Atmos. Environ. 2004, 38, 5901–5910.
   Google Scholar