Assessing Near-Field and Downwind Impacts of Reactivity-Based Substitutions

References

• Seinfeld, J.H.; Pandis, S.N. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: from Air Pollution to Climate Change; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, A.; Milford, J.; Bergin, M.S.; McBride, S.; McNair, L.; Yang, Y.; Stockwell, W.R.; Croes, B. Urban Ozone Control and Atmospheric Reactivity of Organic Gases; Science 1995, 269, 491–495.
   Google Scholar
• McBride, S.J.; Oravetz, M.A.; Russell, A.G. Cost-Benefit and Uncertainty Issues in Using Organic Reactivity to Regulate Urban Ozone; Environ. Sci. Technol. 1997, 31, A238–A244.
   Google Scholar
• Revisions to the CA State Implementation Plan and Revision to the Definition of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)—Removal of VOC Exemptions for CA’s Aerosol Coating Products Reactivity-Based Regulation; Fed. Regist. 2005, 70(5), 53930–53935.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, W. Development of Ozone Reactivity Scales for Volatile Organic Compounds; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 1994, 44, 881–899.
   Google Scholar
• Finlayson-Pitts, B.J.; Pitts, J.N. Tropospheric Air Pollution: Ozone, Airborne Toxics, Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons, and Particles; Science 1997, 276, 1045–1052.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, W.; Atkinson, R. Computer Modeling Study of Incremental Hydrocarbon Reactivity; Environ. Sci. Technol. 1989, 23, 864–880.
   Google Scholar
• Avery, R.J. Reactivity-Based VOC Control for Solvent Products: More Efficient Ozone Reduction Strategies; Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 4845–4850.
   Google Scholar
• Croes, B.E.; Holmes, J.R.; Lloyd, A.C. Reactivity-Based Hydrocarbon Controls—Scientific Issues and Potential Regulatory Applications; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 1992, 42, 657–661.
   Google Scholar
• Dimitriades, B. Scientific Basis for the VOC Reactivity Issues Raised by Section 183(e) of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 1996, 46, 963–970.
   Google Scholar
• Luecken, D.; Mebust, M.R. Technical Challenges Involved in Implementation of VOC Reactivity-Based Control of Ozone; Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42, 1615–1622.
   Google Scholar
• Bergin, M.S.; Russell, A.; Milford, J.B. Quantification of Individual VOC Reactivity Using a Chemically Detailed, 3-Dimensional Photo-chemical Model; Environ. Sci. Technol. 1995, 29, 3029–3037.
   Google Scholar
• Updated Informative Digest, Adoption of Amendments to the Regulation for Reducing Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Aerosol Coating Products and Tables of Maximum Incremental Reactivity (MIR) Values, and Adoption of Amendments to ARB Test Method 310, “Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds in Consumer Products”; Stationary Source and Monitoring and Laboratory Divisions; California Air Resources Board: Sacramento, CA, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, L.; Thompson, T.; McDonald-Buller, E.C.; Webb, A.; Allen, D.T. Photochemical Modeling of Emissions Trading of Highly Reactive Volatile Organic Compounds in Houston, Texas. 1. Reactivity-Based Trading and Potential for Ozone Hot Spot Formation; Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41, 2095–2102.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans; Texas; Highly Reactive Volatile Organic Compound Emissions Cap and Trade Program for the Houston/ Galveston/Brazoria Ozone Nonattainment Area. Fed. Regist. 2006, 71(172), 54046–54051.
   Google Scholar
• Arunachalam, S.; Mathur, R.; Holland, A.; Lee, M.R.; Olerud, D.; Jef-fries, H. Investigation of VOC Reactivity. Assessment with Comprehensive Air Quality Modeling; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill: Chapel Hill, NC, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, W. Calculation of Reactivity Scales Using Regional Models; Draft Report prepared for the Reactivity Research Working Group by the Air Pollution Research Center and College of Engineering; Center for Environmental Research and Technology: University of California– Riverside: Riverside, CA, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, W.; Tonnesen, G.; Yarwood, G. Investigation of VOC Reactivity Effects Using Existing Regional Air Quality Models; Contract SC-20.0-UCRVOC-RRWG; American Chemistry Council: Washington, DC, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Hakami, A.; Arhami, M.; Russell, A. Further Analysis of VOC Reactivity Metrics and Scales; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Research Triangle Park, NC, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Hakami, A.; Harley, R.A.; Milford, J.B.; Odman, M.; Russell, A. Regional, Three-Dimensional Assessment of the Ozone Formation Potential of Organic Compounds; Atmos. Environ. 2004, 38, 121–134.
   Google Scholar
• Hales, J.M. The Reactivity Research Working Group—a Chronological Overview and Evaluation; North American Research Strategy for Tropospheric Ozone: Pasco, WA, 2007; 99.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone; Final Rule. Fed Regist. 2008, 73(6), 16435–16514.
   Google Scholar
• Hakami, A.; Bergin, M.S.; Russell, A. Ozone Formation Potential of Organic Compounds in the Eastern United States: a Comparison of Episodes, Inventories, and Domains; Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38, 6748–6759.
   Google Scholar
• Byun, D.; Schere, K. Review of the Governing Equations, Computational Algorithms, and Other Components of the Models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) Modeling System; Appl. Mech. Rev. 2006, 59, 51–78.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, W. Implementation of the SAPRC-99 Chemical Mechanism into the Models-3 Framework; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, W. P. L. SAPRC Atmospheric Chemical Mechanisms and VOC Reactivity Scales; College of Engineering Center for Environmental Research and Technology; University of California–Riverside: Riverside, CA, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, Y.; Talat Odman, M.; Russell, A. Mass Conservation in the Community Multiscale Air Quality Model; Atmos. Environ. 2006, 40, 1199–1204.
   Google Scholar
• Cohan, D.S.; Hakami, A.; Hu, Y.; Russell, A. Nonlinear Response of Ozone to Emissions: Source Apportionment and Sensitivity Analysis; Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 6739–6748.
   Google Scholar
• Dunker, A.; Yarwood, G.; Ortmann, J.; Wilson, G. Comparison of Source Apportionment and Source Sensitivity of Ozone in a Three-Dimensional Air Quality Model; Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36, 2953–2964.
   Google Scholar
• Napelenok, S.; Cohan, D.; Hu, Y.; Russell, A. Decoupled Direct 3D Sensitivity Analysis for Particulate Matter (DDM-3D/PM); Atmos. Environ. 2006, 40, 6112–6121.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., Wilkinson, J.G.; Russell, A. Fast, Direct Sensitivity Analysis of Multidimensional Photochemical Models; Environ. Sci. Technol 1997, 31, 2859–2868.
   Google Scholar
• Grell, G.; Dudhia, J.; Stauffer, D. A Description of the Fifth-Generation Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model: MM5; NCAR Technical Note 398[H11001]STR; National Center for Atmospheric Research: Boulder, CO, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Pleim, J.; Xiu, A. Development and Testing of a Surface Flux and Planetary Boundary Layer Model for Application in Mesoscale Models; J. Appl. Meteorol. 1995, 34, 16–32.
   Google Scholar
• Xiu, A.; Pleim J. Development of a Land Surface Model. Part I: Application in a Mesoscale Meteorological Model; J. Appl. Meteorol. 2001, 40, 192–209.
   Google Scholar
• Carolina Environmental Program. Sparse Matrix Operator Kernel Emissions Modeling System (SMOKE) Version 2.5 User’s Manual; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill: Chapel Hill, NC, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Documentation of the Revised 2002 Base Year, Revised 2018, and Initial 2009 Emission Inventories for VISTAS, Visibility Improvement State and Tribal Association of the Southeast (VISTAS); MACTEC: Alpharetta, GA, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• SPECIATE Version 3.2; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Final Regulation Order for Reducing the Ozone Formed from Aerosol Coating Product Emissions; California Air Resources Board: Sacramento, CA, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• The California Low-Emission Vehicle Regulations. Fed. Regist. 2007, 72(170), 50650–50652.
   Google Scholar
• Bessagnet, B.; Rouïl, L. Ambient Ozone Simulations in Response to VOC Emission Control Scenarios; INERIS-DRC-No. 76910-LRo-No. 159; Institut National de l’Environment Industriel et des Risques: Verneuil-en-Halatte (Oise), France, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Zaleski, R. ExxonMobil Biomedical Sciences, Inc.: Annandale, NJ. Personal communication, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, W. University of California–Riverside, Riverside, CA. Personal communication, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, L.; Milford, J.B.; Carter, W. Uncertainty Analysis of Chamber-Derived Incremental Reactivity Estimates for n-Butyl Acetate and 2-Butoxyethanol; Atmos. Environ. 2002, 36, 115–135.
   Google Scholar
• Requirements for Preparation, Adoption, and Submittal of Implementation Plans. CFR, Part 51, Title 40, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, W.P.L. Development of the SAPRC-07 Chemical Mechanism and Updated Ozone Reactivity Scales; California Air Resources Board: Sacramento, CA, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone; Final Rule. Fed. Regist. 2008, 73(60), 16435–16514.
   Google Scholar
• Emery, C.; Tai, E.; Yarwood, G. Enhanced Meteorological Modeling and Performance Evaluation for Two Texas Ozone Episodes; Final Report for The Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission: Austin, TX, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Hanna, S.; Yang, R. Evaluations of Mesoscale Models’ Simulations of Near-Surface Winds, Temperature Gradients, and Mixing Depths; J. Appl. Meteorol. 2001, 40, 1095–1104.
   Google Scholar