Evaluation of Particulate Matter Abatement Strategies for Almond Harvest

REFERENCES

• 2009 California Almond Acreage Report U.S. Department of Agriculture; National Agricultural Statistics Service; California Field Office Sacramento, CA, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Emission Inventory Procedural Manual Volume III: Methods for Assessing Area Source Emissions; California Air Resources Board: Sacramento, CA, 2003
   Google Scholar
• Goodrich , L.B. , Faulkner , W.B. , Capareda , S.C. , Krauter , C. and Parnell , C.B. 2009 . Particulate Matter Emission Factors from Reduced-Pass Almond Sweeping . Trans. ASABE , 52 : 1669 – 1675 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downey , D. , Giles , D.K. and Thompson , J.F. 2008 . In Situ Transmissometer Measurements for Real-Time Monitoring of Dust Discharge during Orchard Nut Harvesting . J. Environ. Qual. , 37 : 574 – 581 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faulkner , W.B. and Capareda , S.C. Effects of Sweeping Depth on Particulate Matter Emissions from Almond Harvest Operations . Trans. ASABE. , submitted for publication
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faulkner , W.B. , Goodrich , L.B. , Botlaguduru , V.S.V. , Capareda , S.C. and Parnell , C.B. 2009 . Particulate Matter Emission Factors for Almond Harvest as a Function of Harvester Speed . Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association , 59 : 943 – 949 . doi: 10.3155/1047-3289.59.8.943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Southard , R.J. , Lawson , R.J. , Studer , H.E. and Brown , M. 1997 . Modified Almond Harvester Reduces Orchard Dust . Calif. Ag. , 51 : 10 – 13 .
   Google Scholar
• Whitelock, D.P.; Armijo, C.B.; Buser, M.D.; Hughs, S.E.; Heerema, R.J. A Dust Abatement Device for Harvest. In Proceedings Western Pecan Growers Association, March 4–5, 2007, Las Cruces, NM, pp 19-22 http://www.ars.usda.gov/research/publications/publications.htm=seq_no_115=207600 (http://www.ars.usda.gov/research/publications/publications.htm=seq_no_115=207600) (Accessed: 21 December 2009 ).
   Google Scholar
• Ponpesh , P. , Giles , D.K. and Downey , D. 2010 . Mitigation of In-Orchard Dust through Modified Harvester Operation . Trans. ASABE , 53 : 1037 – 1044 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buser , M. , Parnell , C. , Shaw , B. and Lacey , R. 2007 . Particulate Matter Sampler Errors Due to the Interaction of Particle Size and Sampler Performance Characteristics: Background and Theory . Trans. ASABE , 50 : 221 – 228 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanjura , J.D. , Parnell , C.B. , Shaw , B.W. and Lacey , R.E. 2005 . Design and Evaluation of a Low-Volume Total Suspended Particulate Sampler . Trans. ASABE , 48 : 1547 – 1552 .
   Google Scholar
• Hinds , W.C. 1999 . Aerosol Technology: Properties, Behavior and Measurement of Airborne Particles , 2nd , New York : John Wiley and Sons .
   Google Scholar
• AERMOD: Description of Model Formulation; EPA-454/R-03-004; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Research Triangle Park, NC, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Faulkner , W.B. , Shaw , B.W. and Grosch , T. 2008 . Sensitivity of Two Dispersion Models (AERMOD and ISCST3) to Input Parameters for a Rural Ground-Level Area Source . Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association , 58 : 1288 – 1296 . doi: 10.3155/1047-3289.58.10.1288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar