139
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Extended Deterrence in the Taiwan Strait: Learning from Rationalist Explanations in International Relations

Pages 166-191 | Published online: 07 Aug 2010

References

  • Allison, Graham T., and Phillip Zelikow. 1999. Essence of decision: Explaining the Cuban missile crisis. 2d ed. New York: Addison-Wesley.
  • Axelrod, Robert. 1984. The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
  • Danilovic, Vesna. 2001a. The sources of threat credibility in extended deterrence. Journal of Conflict Resolution 45 (3): 341-69.
  • Danilovic, Vesna. 2001b. Conceptual and selection biases in deterrence. Journal of Conflict Resolution 45 (1): 97-125.
  • Drezner, Daniel W. 1998. Conflict expectations and the paradox of economic coercion. International Studies Quarterly 42 (4): 709-31.
  • Drezner, Daniel W. 1999. The sanctions paradox: Economic statecraft and international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Fearon, James D. 1994a. Domestic political audiences and the escalation of international disputes. American Political Science Review 88 (3): 577-92.
  • Fearon, James D. 1994b. Signaling versus the balance of power and interests: An empirical test of a crisis bargaining model. Journal of Conflict Resolution 38 (2): 236-69.
  • Fearon, James D. 1995. Rationalist explanations for war. International Organization 49 (3): 379-414.
  • Fearon, James D. 1997. Signalling foreign policy interests: Tying hands versus sinking costs. Journal of Conflict Resolution 41 (1): 68-90.
  • Fearon, James D. 1998. Commitment problems and the spread of ethnic conflict. In The international spread of ethnic conflict: Fear, diffusion, and escalation, ed. David A. Lake and Donald Rothchild. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Fearon, James D. 2002. Selection effects and deterrence. International Interactions 28: 5-29.
  • Gartzke, Erik. 1999. War is in the error term. International Organization 53 (3): 567-87.
  • Garver, John W. 1997. Face off: China, the United States, and Taiwan's democratization, Seattle: University of Washington Press.
  • Huth, Paul K. 1988a. Extended deterrence and the prevention of war. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Huth, Paul K. 1988b. Extended deterrence and the outbreak of war. American Political Science Review 82 (2): 423-43.
  • Huth, Paul K., Christopher Gelpi, and D. Scott Bennett. 1993. The escalation of great power militarized disputes: Testing rational deterrence theory and structural realism. American Political Science Review 87 (3): 609-23.
  • Huth, Paul K., and Bruce M. Russett. 1984. What makes deterrence work? Cases from 1900 to 1980. World Politics 36 (4): 496-526.
  • Huth, Paul K., and Bruce M. Russett. 1988. Deterrence failure and crisis escalation. International Studies Quarterly 32 (1): 29-45.
  • Huth, Paul K., and Bruce M. Russett. 1993. General deterrence between enduring rivals: Testing three competing models. American Political Science Review 87 (1): 61-73.
  • Jervis, Robert. 1976. Perception and misperception in international politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Kaempfer, William H., and Anton D. Lowenberg. 1988. The theory of international economic sanctions: A public choice approach. American Economic Review 78 (4): 786-94.
  • Kaempfer, William H., and Anton D. Lowenberg. 1992. International economic sanctions: A public choice perspective. Boulder, CO: Westview.
  • Kaempfer, William H., and Anton D. Lowenberg. 2000. A public choice analysis of the political economy of international sanctions. In Sanctions as economic statecraft: Theory and practice, ed. Steve Chan and A. Cooper Drury. London: Macmillan.
  • Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky, eds. 2000. Choices, values, and frames. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lebow, Richard N., and Janice G. Stein. 1990. Deterrence: The elusive dependent variable. World Politics 42 (3): 336-69.
  • Levy, Jack. 1997. Prospect theory, rational choice, and international relations. International Studies Quarterly 41 (1): 87-112.
  • Mansfield, Edward D., Helen V. Milner, and B. Peter Rosendorff. 2002. Why democracies cooperate more: Electoral control and international trade agreements. International Organization 56 (3): 477-513.
  • Mansfield, Edward D., and Jack Snyder. 1995. Democratization and the danger of war. International Security 20 (1): 5-38.
  • Martin, Lisa L. 1992. Coercive cooperation: Explaining multilateral economic sanctions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Martin, Lisa L. 1993. Credibility, costs, and institutions: Cooperation on economic sanctions. World Politics 45 (3): 406-32.
  • Mercer, Jonathan. 1996. Reputation and international politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Morgan, Patrick. 1983. Deterrence: A conceptual analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Morrow, James D. 1994. Alliances, credibility, and peacetime costs. Journal of Conflict Resolution 38 (2): 270-97.
  • Mueller, John E. 1980. The search for the "breaking point" in Vietnam: The statistics of a deadly quarrel. International Studies Quarterly 24 (4): 497-519.
  • Nossal, Kim R. 1994. Rain dancing: Sanctions in Canadian and Australian foreign policy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  • Pape, Robert A. 1997. Why economic sanctions do not work. International Security 22 (2): 90-136.
  • Pape, Robert A. 1998a. Evaluating economic sanctions. International Security 23 (2): 195-98.
  • Pape, Robert A. 1998b. Why economic sanctions still do not work. International Security 23 (1): 66-77.
  • Pevehouse, Jonathan C. 2002. With a little help from my friends? Regional organizations and the consolidation of democracy. American Journal of Political Science 46 (3): 611-26.
  • Putnam, Robert. 1988. Diplomacy and domestic politics: The logic of two-level games. International Organization 42 (1): 427-60.
  • Rosen, Steven. 1972. War power and the willingness to suffer. In Peace, war, and numbers, ed. Bruce M. Russett. New York: Sage.
  • Russett, Bruce M. 1969. Refining deterrence theory: The Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. In Theory and research on the causes of war, ed. Dean G. Pruitt and Richard C. Snyder. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Sabrosky, Alan N. 1980. Interstate alliances: Their reliability and the expansion of war. In Correlates of war II, ed. J. David Singer. New York: Free Press.
  • Schelling, Thomas C. 1966. Arms and influence. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Schwebach, Valerie L. 2000. Sanctions as signals: A line in the sand or a lack of resolve? In Sanctions as economic statecraft: Theory and practice, ed. Steve Chan and A. Cooper Drury. London: Macmillan.
  • Stolper, Thomas E. 1985. China, Taiwan, and the offshore islands: Together with an implication for outer Mongolia and Sino-Soviet relations. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
  • Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahneman. 1977. Judgment under uncertainty. Science 185 (September 27): 1124-31.
  • Wagner, R. Harrison. 1988. Economic interdependence, bargaining power, and political influence. International Organization 42 (3): 461-83.
  • Wagner, R. Harrison. 2000. Bargaining and war. American Journal of Political Science 44 (3): 469-84.
  • Walter, Barbara F. 1997. The critical barrier to civil war settlement. International Organization 51 (3): 335-64.
  • Whiting, Allen S. 1960. China crosses the Yalu: The decision to enter the Korean War. New York: Macmillan.
  • Whiting, Allen S. 1975. New light on Mao; Quemoy 1958: Mao's miscalculations. China Quarterly 62 (June): 263-70.
  • Yarbrough, Beth V., and Robert M. Yarbrough. 1986. Reciprocity, bilateralism, and economic "hostages": Self-enforcing agreements in international trade. International Studies Quarterly 30 (1): 7-21.
  • Yarbrough, Beth V., and Robert M. Yarbrough. 1992. Cooperation and governance in international trade. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.