Advanced search
Publication Cover
Archives of Environmental & Occupational Health Volume 63, 2008 - Issue 1
Submit an article Journal homepage
172
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

The Peer-Review Process and Its Relationship With Environmental and Occupational Health

Derek R. Smith DrMedSc, PhD, MPH, MHSc Archives of Environmental & Occupational Health
&
Tee L. Guidotti MD, MPH Archives of Environmental & Occupational Health
Pages 3-7 | Published online: 07 Aug 2010

References

  • Rocha B. Trouble with peer review. Nat Immunol. 2001;2:277.
  • Smith R. Opening up BMJ peer review. BMJ. 1999;318:4-5.
  • Szklo M. Quality of scientific articles. Rev Saude Publica. 2006;40:30-35.
  • Lawrence PA. The politics of publication. Nature. 2003;422:259-261.
  • Curfman GD, Drazen JM. Too close to call. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:832.
  • Schachat AP. Peers review, editors decide, and then what? Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143:677-678.
  • Campion EW, Curfman GD, Drazen JM. Tracking the peer-review process. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:1485-1486.
  • Lumley J, Daly J. The reviewing process. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2003;27:479-480.
  • Lock S. Peer review weighed in the balance. BMJ. 1982;285:1224-1226.
  • Pros and cons of open peer review [editorial]. Nat Neurosci. 1999;2:197-198.
  • Hobson J. Reviewing peer review in occupational medicine. Occup Med. 2002;52:437-438.
  • Weller AC. Editorial peer review in US medical journals. JAMA. 1990;263-1344-1347.
  • Rennie D. Freedom and responsibility in medical publication: setting the balance right. JAMA. 1998;280:300-302.
  • Cho MK, Justice AC, Winker MA, et al. Masking author identity in peer review: what factors influence masking success? PEER Investigators. JAMA. 1998;280:243-245.
  • Justice AC, Cho MK, Winker MA, Berlin JA, Rennie D. Does masking author identity improve peer review quality? A randomized controlled trial. PEER Investigators. JAMA. 1998;280:240-242.
  • Schroter S, Tite L, Hutchings A, Black N. Differences in review quality and recommendations for publication between peer reviewers suggested by authors or by editors. JAMA. 2006;295:314-317.
  • Guidotti TL. The literature of environmental and occupational health (EOH) I. Appreciating diversity in the literature of EOH. Arch Environ Occup Health. 2006;61:51-52.
  • Smith DR, Takahashi K. Towards uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to journals in occupational medicine. Occup Med. 2007;57:613-614.
  • Smith DR, Leggat PA, Araki S. Emerging occupational hazards among health care workers in the new millennium. Ind Health. 2007;45:595-597.
  • International Steering Committee of Medical Editors. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. BMJ. 1978;1:1334-1336.
  • Berger E. Peer review: a castle built on sand or the bedrock of scientific publishing? Ann Emerg Med. 2006;47:157-159.
  • Wilson JD. Peer review and publication [presentation]. J Clin Investigat. 1978;61:1697-1701.
  • Burnham JC. The evolution of editorial peer review. JAMA. 1990;263-1323-1329.
  • Forscher BK. Rules for referees. Science. 1965;150:319-321.
  • Guidotti TL. The literature of EOH. II. The scientific research paper. Arch Environ Occup Health. 2006;61:99-100.
  • Callaham M, Wears RL, Weber E. Journal prestige, publication bias, and other characteristics associated with citation of published studies in peer-reviewed journals. JAMA. 2002;287-2847-2850.
  • Liesegang TJ, Shaikh M, Crook JE. The outcome of manuscripts submitted to the American Journal of Ophthalmology between 2002 and 2003. Am J Opthalmol. 2007;143:551-560.
  • Nemery B. What happens to the manuscripts that have not been accepted for publication in Occupational and Environmental Medicine? Occup Environ Med. 2001;58:604-607.
  • Smith DR. Historical development of the journal impact factor and its relevance for occupational health. Ind Health. 2007;45:730-742.
  • Weller AC. Editorial policy and the assessment of quality among medical journals. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1987;75:310-316.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.