178
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Grading Styles and Instructor Attitudes

, &
Pages 57-64 | Published online: 07 Aug 2010

References

  • Ames, R. 1975. Teachers' attributions of responsibility: Some unexpected nondefensive effects. Journal of Educational Psychology 67 (5): 668-76.
  • Anglin, P. M., and R. Meng. 2000. Evidence on grades and grade inflation at Ontario's universities. Canadian Public Policy 26 (3): 361-69.
  • Astin, A. W. 1998. The changing American college student: Thirty-year trends, 1966-1996. Review of Higher Education 21 (2): 115-35.
  • Bandura, A., and R. F. Walters. 1963. Social learning and personality development. New York: Hold, Rinehart, and Winston.
  • Birk, L. 2000. Grade inflation: What's really behind all those A's? Harvard Education Letter Research Online. January/February, http://www.edletter.org/past/issues/2000-jf/grades.shtml
  • Bruhn, J. G., H. Bunce III, and R. C. Greaser. 1978. Correlations of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator with other personality and achievement variables. Psychological Reports 43:771-76.
  • Bombardieri, M. 2004. Princeton plan seeks to ease grade inflation. Boston Globe, April 8.
  • Borg, M. O., and S. L. Shapiro. 1996. Personality type and student performance in principles of economics. Journal of Economic Education 27 (1): 3-25.
  • Brennan, K. A., and J. K. Bosson. 1998. Attachment style differences in attitudes toward and reactions to feedback from romantic partners: An exploration of the relational bases of self-esteem. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 24 (7): 699-714.
  • Caspersz, D., M. Wu, and J. Skene. 2002. The influence of gender and country-of-origin effects on student processes in team projects. Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australia 98-105.
  • Centra, J. A. 2003. Will teachers receive higher student evaluations by giving higher grades and less course work? Research in Higher Education 44 (5): 495-519.
  • Charkins, R. J., D. M. O'Toole, and J. N. Wetzel. 1985. Linking teacher and student learning style with student achievement and attitudes. Journal of Economic Education 16 (2): 111-20.
  • Corcoran, K., and J. Fischer, eds. 2000. Measures for clinical practice: A sourcebook. 3rd ed. New York: Free Press.
  • Crowl, T. K. 1984. Grading behavior and teachers' need for social approval. Education 104 (3): 291-95.
  • Crowne, D. P., and D. Marlowe. 1964. The approval motive. New York: Wiley.
  • D'Apollonia, S., and P. C. Abrami. 1997. Navigating student ratings of instruction. American Psychologist 52 (11): 1198-1208.
  • Dickson, V. A. 1994. An economic model of faculty grading practices. Journal of Economic Education 15 (3): 197-203.
  • Fedler, F., T. Counts, and K. Stoner. 1989. Adjunct profs grade higher than faculty at three schools. Journalism Educator 44 (2): 32-37.
  • Feist, J., and G. Feist. 1998. Theories of personality. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Germain, M., and T. A. Scandura. 2005. Grade inflation and student individual differences as systematic bias in faculty evaluations. Journal of Instructional Psychology 32 (1): 58-68.
  • Greenwald, A. G. 1997. Validity concerns and usefulness of student ratings of instruction. American Psychologist 52 (11): 1182-86.
  • Greenwald, A. G., and G. M. Gilmore. 1997. Grading leniency is a removable contaminant of student ratings. American Psychologist 52 (11): 1209-17.
  • Gromski, W., and D. Dolinski. 1987. Ascription of responsibility for others. Journal of Social Psychology 127 (3): 251-58.
  • Hakstian, A. R., P. Suedfeld, E. J. Ballard, and D. S. Rank. 1986. The Ascription of Responsibility Questionnaire: Development and empirical extensions. Journal of Personality Assessment 50:229-47.
  • Healy, P. 2001a. Harvard's quiet secret: Rampant grade inflation. Boston Globe, October 7, A1.
  • Healy, P. 2001b. Harvard's honors fall to the merely average. Boston Globe, October 8, B1.
  • Hebert, Y. M., L. Clemow, I. S. Ockene, G. Gaperia, E. J. Stanek III, P. A. Merriam, and J. K. Ockene. 1997. Gender differences in social desirability and social approval bias in dietary self-report. American Journal of Epidemiology 146 (12): 1046-55.
  • Hegtvedt, K. A., E. A. Thompson, and K. S. Cook. 1993. Power and equity: What counts in attributions for exchange outcomes? Social Psychology Quarterly 56 (2): 100-19.
  • Hittner, J. B. 1997. A preliminary analysis of the perceived risks of misusing multiple substances, trait anxiety, and approval motivation. Journal of Psychology 131 (5): 501-11.
  • Kamber, R., and M. Biggs. 2002. Grade conflation: A question of credibility. Chronicle Review, April 12, 14.
  • Keirsey, D., and M. Bates. 1984. Please understand me: Character and temperament types. Del Mar, CA: Prometheus Nemesis.
  • L'Heureux-Barrett, T., and J. L. Barnes-Farrell. 1991. Overcoming gender bias in reward allocation. Psychology of Women Quarterly 15 (1): 127-39.
  • Lien, M. 2004. Grade inflation not a concern for professors. Phoenix, March 25. http://phoenix.swarthmore.edu/2004/2004-03-25/news/13862
  • Lopez, F. G. 2001. Adult attachment orientations, self-other boundary regulation, and splitting tendencies in a college sample. Journal of Counseling Psychology 48 (4): 440-46.
  • Marsh, H. W., and L. A. Roche. 1997. Making students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective: The critical issues of validity, bias, and utility. American Psychologist 52 (11): 1187-97.
  • Martin, H. J. 1984. A revised measure of approval motivation and its relationship to social desirability. Journal of Personality Assessment 48 (5): 508-20.
  • Matteucci, M. C., and P. Gosling. 2004. Italian and French teachers faced with pupils' academic failure: The "norm of effort." European Journal of Psychology of Education 19 (2): 147-67.
  • McArthur, R. C. 1999. A comparison of grading patterns between full-and part-time humanities faculty: A preliminary study. Community College Review 27 (3): 65-87.
  • McKeachie, W. J. 1997. Student ratings: The validity of use. American Psychologist 52 (11): 1218-25.
  • Mitchell, C. L. 1987. Relationship of femininity, masculinity, and gender to attribution of responsibility. Sex Roles 16 (3-4): 151-63.
  • Moulton, P., M. Moulton, and S. Roach. 1998. Eating disorders: A means for seeking approval? Eating Disorders 6 (4): 319-27.
  • Mukai, T., A. Kambara, and Y. Sasaki. 1998. Body dissatisfaction, need for social approval, and eating disturbances among Japanese and American college women. Sex Roles 39 (9): 751-63.
  • Rudolph, K. D., M. S. Caldwell, and C. S. Conley. 2005. Need for approval and children's well-being. Child Development 76 (2): 309-23.
  • Sabot, R., and J. Wakeman-Linn. 1991. Grade inflation and course choice. Journal of Economic Perspectives 5 (1): 159-70.
  • Skinner, B. 1938. The behavior of organisms. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
  • Stratton, R. W., S. C. Myers, and R. H. King. 1994. Faculty behavior, grades, and student evaluations. Journal of Economic Education 25 (1): 5-15.
  • Stricker, L. J., H. Schiffman, and J. Ross. 1965. Prediction of college performance with the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Educational and Psychological Measurement 25 (4): 1081-97.
  • Tang, S. 1999. Student evaluation of teachers: Effects of grading at college level. Journal of Research and Development in Education 32 (2): 84-88.
  • Thornton, B., M. A. Robbins, and J. A. Johnson. 1981. Social perception of the rape victim's culpability: The influence on respondents' personal-environmental causal attribution tendencies. Human Relations 34 (3): 225-37.
  • Trentham, S., and L. Larwood. 2001. Power and gender influences on responsibility attributions: The case of disagreements in relationships. Journal of Social Psychology 141 (6): 730-51.
  • Wei, M., B. Mallinckrodt, L. Larson, and R. Zakalik. 2005. Adult attachment, depressive symptoms, and validation from self versus others. Journal of Counseling Psychology 42 (3): 368-77.
  • Weiner, B. 1974. Achievement motivation and attribution theory. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
  • Weiner, B. 1986. An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  • Ziegert, A. L. 2000. The role of personality temperament and student learning in principles of economics: Further evidence. Journal of Economic Education 31 (4): 307-22.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.