76
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Phonological and Orthographic Coding Skills in Adult Readers

Pages 267-280 | Published online: 07 Aug 2010

References

  • Annett, M. (1970). A classification of hand preference by association analysis. British Journal of Psychology, 61, 303-321.
  • Woodcock, R. W. (1998). Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests-Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
  • Kimura, D. (1999). Sex and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Bruck, M. (1992). Persistence of dyslexics' phonological deficits. Developmental Psychology, 28, 874-886.
  • Bruck, M. (1990). Word-recognition skills in adults with childhood diagnoses of dyslexia. Developmental Psychology, 26, 439-454.
  • Bruck, M. (1998). Outcomes of adults with childhood histories of dyslexia. In C. Hulme & R. M. Joshi (Eds.), Reading and spelling: Development and disorders (pp. 179-200). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Chateau, D., & Jared, D. (2000). Exposure to print and word recognition processes. Memory & Cognition, 28, 143-153.
  • Cohen, J., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). Psyscope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using MacIntosh computers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25, 257-271.
  • Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dualroute and parallel-distributed processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100, 589-608.
  • Jastak, S., & Wilkinson, G. S. (1984). The Wide-Range Achievement Test-Revised. Wilmington, DE: Jastak.
  • Lennox, C., & Siegel, L. S. (1998). Phonological and orthographic processes in good and poor spellers. In C. Hulme & R. M. Joshi (Eds.), Reading and spelling: Development and disorders (pp. 395-404). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Liberman, I. Y., Shankweiler, D., & Liberman, A. (1989). The alphabetic principle and learning to read. In D. Shankweiler & Liberman (Eds.), Phonology and reading disability: Solving the reading puzzle (pp. 1-34). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Lukatela, G., & Turvey, M. T. (1994). Visual access is initially phonological: Evidence from associative priming by words, homophones, and pseudohomophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 107-128.
  • Luo, C. R., Johnson, R. A., Gallo, D. A. (1998). Automatic activation of phonological information in reading: Evidence from the semantic relatedness decision task. Memory & Cognition, 26, 833-843.
  • Majeres, R. L. (1999). Sex differences in phonological processing: Speeded matching and word reading. Memory & Cognition, 27, 246-253.
  • McCusker, L. X., Hillinger, M. L., & Bias, R. C. (1981). Phonological recoding and reading. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 217-245.
  • Olson, R. K., Kliegel, R., Davidson, B., & Foltz, G. (1985). Individual and developmental differences in reading disability. In G. E. MacKinnon & T. G. Waller (Eds.), Reading research: Advances in theory and practice (Vol. 4, pp. 1-64). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Pennington, B., McCabe, S. D., Lefly, D. L., Bookman, M, O., Kimberling, W. J., & Lubs, H. A. (1986). Spelling errors in adults with a form of familial dyslexia. Child Development, 57, 1001-1013.
  • Perfetti, C. A., & Bell, L. C. (1991). Phonemic activation during first 40 ms of word identification: Evidence from backward masking and priming. Journal of Memory & Language, 30, 473-485.
  • Shafrir, U., & Siegel, L. S. (1994). Preference for visual scanning versus phonological rehearsal in university students with reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 583-588.
  • Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151-218.
  • Share, D. L., & Stanovich, K. E. (1995). Cognitive processes in early reading development: Accommodating individual differences into a model of acquisition. Issues in Education: Contributions From Educational Psychology, 1, 1-57.
  • Siegel, L. S., Share, D., & Geva, E. (1995). Evidence for superior orthographic skills in dyslexics. Psychological Science, 6, 250-254.
  • Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360-406.
  • Stanovich, K. E., & Siegel, L. S. (1994). Phenotypic performance profile of children with reading disabilities: A regression-based test of the phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 24-53.
  • Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1989). Exposure to print and orthographic processing. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 402-433.
  • Shaywitz, S. E., Escobar, M. D., Shaywitz, B. A., & Fletcher, J. M. (1992). Evidence that dyslexia may represent the lower tail of a normal distribution of reading ability. The New England Journal of Medicine, 326, 145-150.
  • Siegel, L. S. (1994). Phonological processing deficits as the basis of developmental dyslexia: Implications for remediation. In G. Humphries & J. Riddoch (Eds.), Cognitive neuropsychology and cognitive rehabilitation (pp. 392-400). Hove, England: Erlbaum.
  • Manis, F. R., Custodio, R., & Szeszulski, P. A. (1993). Development of phonological and orthographic skill: A 2-year longitudinal study of dyslexic children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 56, 64-86.
  • McBride-Chang, C., Manis, F. R., Seidenberg, M. S., Custodio, R. G., & Doi, L. M. (1993). Print exposure as a predictor of word reading and reading comprehension in disabled and nondisabled readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 230-238.
  • Ehri, L. C. (1998). Grapheme-phoneme knowledge is essential for learning to read words in English. In J. Metsala & L. Ehri (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 3-40). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Frost, R. (1998). Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: True issues and false trails. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 71-99.
  • Gilger, J. W. (1992). Using self-report and parental-report survey data to assess past and present academic achievement in adults and children. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 13, 235-256.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.