Individual Differences in Metacognitive Responsiveness: Cognitive and Personality Correlates

References

• Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessments, 4, 26-42.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Fox, C. R. (1995). Weighing risk and uncertainty. Psychological Review, 102, 269-283.
   Google Scholar
• Neuberg, S. L., & Newsome, J. T. (1993). Personal need for structure: Individual differences in the desire for simpler structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 113-131.
   Google Scholar
• Pitz, G. F., & Sachs, N. J. (1984). Judgment and decision: Theory and application. Annual Review of Psychology, 35, 139-163.
   Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I., & Raichle, M. E. (1994). Images of mind. New York: Scientific American Books.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, D., & Tversky, A. (2002). The weighing of evidence and determinants of confidence. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 230-249). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2003). Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: The contributions of goal-neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 47-70.
   Google Scholar
• Keren, G. (1991). Calibration and probability judgments: Conceptual and methodological issues. Acta Psychologica, 77, 217-273.
   Google Scholar
• Liberman, V. (2004). Local and global judgments of confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30, 729-732.
   Google Scholar
• McClelland, A. G. R., & Bolger, F. (1994). The calibration of subjective probabilities: Theories and models 1980-1993. In G. Wright & P. Ayton (Eds.), Subjective probability (pp. 453-482). Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, T. O. (1984). A comparison of current measures of accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 109-133.
   Google Scholar
• Neuberg, S. L., Judice, T. N., & West, S. G. (1997). What the Need for Closure Scale measures and what it does not: Toward differentiating among related epistemic motives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1396-1412.
   Google Scholar
• Shuper, P. A., Sorrentino, R. M., Otsubo, Y., Hodson, G., & Walker, A. M. (2004). A theory of uncertainty orientation: Implications for the study of individual differences within and across cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 460-480.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. D., Shields, W. E., Schull, J., & Washburn, D. A. (1997). The uncertain response in humans and animals. Cognition, 62, 75-97.
   Google Scholar
• Blackwood, N., ffytche, D., Simmons, A., Bentall, R., Murray, R., & Howard, R. (2004). The cerebellum and decision making under uncertainty. Cognitive Brain Research, 20, 46-53.
   Google Scholar
• Bless, H., & Forgas, J. P. (2000). The message within: The role of subjective experience in social cognition and behavior. New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Broadbent, D. E., Cooper, P. F., & FitzGerald, P. (1982). The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ) and its correlates. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 21, 1-16.
   Google Scholar
• Brouwers, M. C., Sorrentino, R. M., Roney, C. J. R., & Hanna, S. E. (2004). Predicting the impact of trauma disclosure on physiological responses: How cognitive style challenges our ideas about coping. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23, 697-715.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. S. (1991). A review of the tip-of-the-tongue experience. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 204-223.
   Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116-131.
   Google Scholar
• Farmer, R., & Sundberg, N. D. (1986). Boredom proneness: The development and correlates of a new scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 50, 4-17.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. D., Shields, W. E., & Washburn, D. A. (2003). The comparative psychology of uncertainty monitoring and metacognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26, 317-373.
   Google Scholar
• Sorrentino, R. M., & Roney, C. J. R. (2000). The uncertain mind: Individual differences in facing the unknown. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, M. M., Naccarato, M. E., Parker, K. C. H., & Moskowitz, G. B. (2001). The personal need for structure and personal fear of invalidity measures: Historical perspectives, current applications, and future directions. In G. B. Moskowitz (Ed.), Cognitive social psychology: The Princeton symposium on the legacy and future of social cognition (pp. 19-39). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• van Mourik, R., Oosterlaan, J., & Sergeant, J. A. (2005). The Stroop revisited: A metaanalysis of interference control in AD/HD. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 46, 150-165.
   Google Scholar
• Washburn, D. A. (1994). Stroop-like effects for monkeys and humans: Processing speed or strength of association? Psychological Science, 5, 375-379.
   Google Scholar
• Washburn, D. A., & Putney, R. T. (1997). Assessment software for attention profiles.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, D. M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1049-1062.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131.
   Google Scholar
• West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (1997). The domain specificity and generality of over-confidence: Individual differences in performance estimation bias. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 387-392.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, B. C., & Wanley, A. (2003). Adults' versus children's performance on the Stroop task: Interference and facilitation. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 475-485.
   Google Scholar