Predicting Changes in Adjustment Using Repeated Measures of Sociometric Status

References

• Boivin, M., Hymel, S., & Bukowski, W. M. (1995). The roles of social withdrawal, peer rejection, and victimization by peers in predicting loneliness and depressed mood in childhood. Development and Psychopathology, 7, 765-785.
   Google Scholar
• Cillessen, A. H. N., Bukowski, W. M., & Haselager, G. J. T. (2000). Stability of sociometric categories. In A. H. N. Cillessen & W. M. Bukowski (Eds.), Recent advances in the measurement of acceptance and rejection in the peer system (pp. 75-93). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Cillessen, A. H. N., van IJzendoorn, H. W., & Ferguson, T. J. (1991, July). Social behavioral and social adjustment differences between stable and unstable sociometric groups. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the International Society for the Study of Behavioral Development, Minneapolis, MN.
   Google Scholar
• Cillessen, A. H. N., van IJzendoorn, H. W., van Lieshout, C. F. M., & Hartup, W. W. (1992). Heterogeneity among peer-rejected boys: Subtypes and stabilities. Child Development, 63, 893-905.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Coie, J. D., & Dodge, K. A. (1983). Continuities and changes in children's social status: A five-year longitudinal study. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 29, 261-282.
   Google Scholar
• Crick, N. R., & Ladd, G. W. (1989). Nominator attrition: Does it affect the accuracy of children's sociometric classifications? Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 35, 197-207.
   Google Scholar
• DeRosier, M. E., Cillessen, A. H. N., & Coie, J. D. (1994). Group social context and children's aggressive behavior. Child Development, 65, 1068-1079.
   Google Scholar
• DeRosier, M. E., Kupersmidt, J. B., & Patterson, C. J. (1994). Children's academic and behavioral adjustment as a function of the chronicity and proximity of peer rejection. Child Development, 65, 1799-1813.
   Google Scholar
• DeRosier, M. E., & Thomas, J. M. (2003). Strengthening of sociometric prediction: Scientific advances in the assessment of children's peer relations. Child Development, 74, 1379-1392.
   Google Scholar
• Dodge, K. A., Lansford, J. E., Burks, V. S., Bates, J. E., Pettit, G. S., Fontaine, R., et al. (2003). Peer rejection and social information-processing factors in the development of aggressive behavior problems in children. Child Development, 74, 374-393.
   Google Scholar
• Haselager, G. J. T., Cillessen, A. H. N., van Lieshout, C. F. M., Riksen-Walraven, J. M. A., & Hartup, W. W. (2002). Heterogeneity among peer-rejected boys across middle childhood: Developmental pathways of social behavior. Developmental Psychology, 38, 446-456.
   Google Scholar
• Hightower, A. D., Cowen, E. L., & Spinell, A. P. (1987). The Child Rating Scale: The development of a socioemotional self-rating scale for elementary school children. School Psychology Review, 16, 239-255.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, X. L., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2005). Stability of continuous measures of sociometric status: A meta-analysis. Developmental Review, 25, 1-25.
   Google Scholar
• Kupersmidt, J. B., Coie, J. D., & Dodge, K. A. (1990). The role of poor peer relationships in the development of disorder. In S. R. Asher & J. D. Coie (Eds.), Peer rejection in childhood (pp. 274-305). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kupersmidt, J. B., & Dodge, K. A. (Eds.). (2004). Children's peer relations: From development to intervention. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Maassen, G. H., van der Linden, J. L., Goossens, F. A., & Bokhorst, J. (2000). A ratings-based approach to two-dimensional sociometric status determination. In A. H. N. Cillessen & W. M. Bukowski (Eds.), Recent advances in the measurement of acceptance and rejection in the peer system (pp. 55-74). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• McDougall, P., Hymel, S., & Vaillancourt, T. (2001). The consequences of childhood peer rejection. In M. R. Leary (Ed.), Interpersonal rejection (pp. 213-247). London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno, J. L. (1934). Who shall survive? A new approach to the problem of human interrelations. Washington, DC: Nervous and Mental Disease Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, J. G., & Asher, S. R. (1987). Peer relations and later personal adjustment: Are low-accepted children "at risk"? Psychological Bulletin, 102, 357-389.
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, G., Clawson, M. A., Dodge, K. A., & Bates, J. E. (1996). Stability and change in peer-rejected status: The role of child behavior, parenting, and family ecology. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 42, 267-294.
   Google Scholar
• Terry, R. (2000). Recent advances in measurement theory and the use of sociometric techniques. In A. H. N. Cillessen & W. M. Bukowski (Eds.), Recent advances in the measurement of acceptance and rejection in the peer system (pp. 27-53). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Underwood, M. K., Mayeux, L., Risser, S., & Harper, B. (2006). The ecstasy and the agony of collecting sociometric data in public school classrooms: Ethical challenges, community concerns, and pragmatic solutions. In B. Leadbeater, E. Banister, C. Benoit, M. Jansson, A. Marshall, & T. Riecken (Eds.), Ethical issues in community-based research with children and youth (pp. 93-110). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: York University Press.
   Google Scholar