1,087
Views
72
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Additional Evidence on the Relationship between Class Size and Student Performance

&
Pages 311-329 | Published online: 07 Aug 2010

  • Heckman, J. J. 1979. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47 (1): 153-61.
  • Kennedy, P. E. 2003. A guide to econometrics. 5th ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Kennedy, P. E., and J. J. Siegfried. 1996. On the optimality of unequal class sizes. Economics Letters 50 (3): 299-304.
  • Becker, W. E., and J. R. Powers. 2001. Student performance, attrition, and class size given missing student data. Economics of Education Review 20 (4): 377-88.
  • Preece, P. F. W. 1987. Class size and learning: A theoretical model. Journal of Educational Research 80 (6): 377-79.
  • Becker, W. E., and W. B. Walstad. 1990. Data loss from pretest to posttest as a sample selection problem. Review of Economics and Statistics 72 (1): 184-88.
  • Bellante, D. M. 1972. A summary report on student performance in mass lecture classes of economics. Journal of Economic Education 4 (1): 53-54.
  • Bogan, E. C. 1996. Challenges in teaching large economics classes. International Advances in Economic Research 2 (1): 58-63.
  • Olsen, R. J. 1980. A least squares correction for selectivity bias. Econometrica 48 (7): 1815-20.
  • Finegan, T. A., and J. J. Siegfried. 1998. Do introductory economics students learn more if their instructor has a Ph.D.. The American Economist 42 (2): 34-46.
  • Glass, G. V., and M. L. Smith. 1979. Meta-analysis of research on class size and achievement. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis 1 (1): 2-16.
  • Greene, W. H. 2003. Econometric analysis. 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Hancock, T. M. 1996. Effects of class size on college student achievement. College Student Journal 30 (4): 479-81.
  • Hansen, L., A. Kelly, and B. Weisbrod. 1970. Economic efficiency and the distribution of benefits from college instruction. American Economic Review. Papers and Proceedings 60 (2): 364-69.
  • Kennedy, P. E., and J. J. Siegfried. 1997. Class size and achievement in introductory economics: Evidence from the TUCE III data. Economics of Education Review 16 (4): 385-94.
  • Kerkvliet, J. 1994. Cheating by economics students: A comparison of survey results. Journal of Economic Education 25 (2): 121-33.
  • Laband, D. N., and M. J. Piette. 1995. Does who teaches principles of economics matter. American Economic Review. Papers and Proceedings 85 (2): 335-38.
  • Lippman, S. A. 1990. On the optimality of equal class sizes. Economics Letters 33 (2): 193-96.
  • Lopus, J. S., and N. L. Maxwell. 1995. Teaching tools: Should we teach microeconomic principles before macroeconomic principles. Economic Inquiry 33 (2): 336-50.
  • Maddala, G. S. 1983. Limited dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Maxwell, N. L., and J. S. Lopus. 1994. The Lake Wobegon effect in student self-reported data. American Economic Review. Papers and Proceedings 84 (2): 201-05.
  • McKeachie, W. J. 1990. Research on college teaching: The historical background. Journal of Educational Psychology 82 (2): 189-200.
  • Mixon, F. G. 1996. Crime in the classroom: An extension. Journal of Economic Education 27 (3): 195-200.
  • Raimondo, H. J., L. Esposito, and I. Gershenberg. 1990. Introductory class size and student performance in intermediate theory courses. Journal of Economic Education 21 (4): 369-81.
  • Saunders, P. 1991. The third edition of the Test of Understanding in College Economics. Journal of Economic Education 22 (3): 255-72.
  • Siegfried, J. J., and P. E. Kennedy. 1995. Does pedagogy vary with class size in introductory economics. American Economic Review. Papers and Proceedings 82 (2): 347-51.
  • Walstad, W. B. 1998. Multiple choice tests for the economics course. In W. B. Walstad and P. Saunders, eds., Teaching undergraduate economics: A handbook for instructors, 287-304. New York: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.
  • Watts, M., and G. J. Lynch. 1989. The principles courses revisited. American Economic Review. Papers and Proceedings 79 (2): 236-41.
  • Siegfried, J. J., and W. B. Walstad. 1998. Research on teaching college economics. In W. B. Walstad and P. Saunders, eds., Teaching undergraduate economics: A handbook for instructors, 141-66. New York: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.
  • Slavin, R. 1990. Class size and student achievement: Is smaller better. Contemporary Education 62 (1): 6-12.
  • Toth, L. S., and L. G. Montagna. 2002. Class size and achievement in higher education: A summary of current research. College Student Journal 36 (2): 253-60.
  • Bunn, D. N., S. B. Caudill, and D. M. Gropper. 1992. Crime in the classroom: An economic analysis of undergraduate student cheating behavior. Journal of Economic Education 23 (3): 197-207.
  • Chan, N., and P. E. Kennedy. 2002. Are multiple-choice exams easier for economics students. A comparison of multiple-choice and "equivalent" constructed-response exam questions. Southern Economic Journal 68 (4): 957-71.
  • Correa, H. 1993. An economic analysis of class size and achievement in education. Education Economics 1 (2): 129-35.
  • Davidson, R., and J. G. MacKinnon. 1993. Estimation and inference in econometrics. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Mulder, J. 1990. Class size revisited: The Glass/ERS debate. Contemporary Education 62 (1): 47-49.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.