- Allais, M. 1953. Fondements d'une théorie positive des choix comportant un risque et critique des postulats et axioms de L'Ecole Americane [English translation]. Dordrecht: Reidel.
- Friedman, M. 1957. A theory of consumption. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Allais, M. 1979. The foundations of a positive theory of choice involving risk and a criticism of the postulates and axioms of the American school. In Expected utility hypotheses and the Allais paradox, eds. M. Allais and O. Hagan, 27-148. Dordrecht: Reidel.
- Becker, W. E. 1998. Engaging students in quantitative analysis with the academic and popular press. In Teaching economics to undergraduates: Alternatives to chalk and talk, eds. W. Becker and M. Watts, 241-67. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
- Friedman, M. 1992. Communication: Do old fallacies ever die. Journal of Economic Literature 30 (December): 2129-32.
- Friedman, M., and A. Schwartz. 1991. Alternative approaches to analyzing economic data: Appendix. American Economic Review 81 (March): 39-49.
- Greene, W. H. 2003. Econometric analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.: Prentice-Hall.
- Becker, W. E., and W. H. Greene. 2004. Bringing contemporary quantitative methods into the undergraduate computer classroom. In The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: Contributions of research universities, eds. W. Becker and M. Andrews, 99-128. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
- Bollerslev, T., and E. Ghysels. 1996. Periodic autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 14 (2): 139-51.
- Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. 1979. Intuitive prediction: Biases and corrective procedures. TIMS Studies in Management Science 12: 313-27.
- Krueger, A. 2000. Economic scene: Children smart enough to get into elite schools may not need to bother. New York Times, April 27.
- Meghir, C. 2004. A retrospective on Friedman's theory of permanent income. Working Paper 04/01. Institute for Fiscal Studies, London.
- Cochrane, D., and G. Orcutt. 1949. Application of least squares regression to relationships containing autocorrelated error terms. Journal of the American Statistical Association 44 (245): 32-61.
- Colander, D. 2004. Caveat lector: Living with the 15 percent rule. Australasian Journal of Economics Education 1 (1): 30-40.
- Dale, S. B., and A. Krueger. 2002. Estimating the payoff to attending a more selective college: An application of selection on observables and unobservables. Quarterly Journal of Economics 117 (4) November: 1491-528.
- Econometric Software, Inc. 2002. NLOGIT, Version 3.0. Plainview, NY.
- Engle, R., and C. Granger. 1987. Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica 55 (2): 251-76.
- Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1982. Intuitive prediction: Biases and corrective procedures. In Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases, eds. D. Kahneman and A. Tversky. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- von Neumann, J., and O. Morgenstern. 1944. Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Wainer, H. 2000. Visual revelations: Kelley's paradox. Chance 13 (Winter): 47-48.
- Heckman, J. 1979. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47 (1): 153-62.
- McFadden, D. 1974. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In Frontiers in econometrics. ed. P. Zarembka, 105-42. New York: Academic Press.
- Mroz, T. 1987. The sensitivity of an empirical model of married women's hours of work to economic and statistical assumptions. Econometrica 55 (4): 765-99.
- Hausman, J. 1978. Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica 46 (6): 1251-71.
- Train, K. 2003. Discrete choice methods with simulation, 75-78. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Starmer, C. 2000. Developments in non-expected utility theory: The hunt for a descriptive theory of choice under risk. Journal of Economic Literature 38 (June): 332-82.
- Sharpe, W. F. 1985. Investment. 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- List, J. 2003. Does market experience eliminate market anomalies. Quarterly Journal of Economics 118 (February): 41-71.
Using the Nobel Laureates in Economics to Teach Quantitative Methods
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.