700
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Multiple Intelligences and Reading Achievement: An Examination of the Teele Inventory of Multiple Intelligences

, &
Pages 41-52 | Published online: 07 Aug 2010

References

  • Briggs, S. R., & Cheek, J. M. (1986). The role of factor analysis in the development and evaluation of personality scales. Journal of Personality, 54, 106-148.
  • Darby, J. T., & Catterall, J. S. (1994). The fourth R: The arts and learning. Teachers College Record, 96(2), 300-321.
  • Frasier, M. M., Hunsaker, S. L., Lee, J., Finley, V. S., Frank, E., Garcia, J. H., et al. (1995). Educator's perceptions of barriers to the identification of gifted children from economically disadvantaged and limited English proficient backgrounds. Storrs: University of Connecticut, The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
  • Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. New York: Basic Books.
  • Gardner, H. (1999, July). Multiple intelligences for the new millennium. Paper presented at the Eighth International Conference on Thinking, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  • Gardner, H., & Hatch, T. (1990). Multiple intelligences go to school: Educational implications of the theory of multiple intelligences (CTE Tech. Rep. No. 4). New York: Education Development Center for Children and Technology. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 324366)
  • Geimer, M., Getz, J., Pochert, T., & Pullam, K. (2000). Improving student achievement in language arts through implementation of multiple intelligences strategies. Chicago: Saint Xavier University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED444185)
  • Gens, P., Provance, J., VanDuyne, K., & Zimmerman, K. (1998). The effects of integrating a multiple intelligence based language arts curriculum on reading comprehension of first and second grade students. Chicago: Saint Xavier University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED420840)
  • Greenhawk, J. (1997). Multiple intelligences meet standards. Educational Leadership, 55(1), 62-64.
  • Klein, P. D. (1997). Multiplying the problems of intelligence by eight: A critique of Gardner's theory. Canadian Journal of Education, 22, 377-394.
  • Krechevsky, M., & Gardner, H. (1990). Multiple intelligences, multiple chances. In D. E. Inbar (Ed.), Second chance in education (pp. 69-88). Bristol, PA: Falmer Press.
  • Kuzniewski, F., Sanders, M., Smith, G. S., Swanson, S., & Urich, C. (1998). Using multiple intelligences to increase reading comprehension in English and math. (Rep. No. CS-013-228). Chicago: Saint Xavier University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED420839)
  • MacGinitie, W. H., & MacGinitie, D. (1989). Gates-MacGinitie Reading Tests, Technical Report (3rd ed.). Chicago: Riverside Publishing Company.
  • Mettetal, G., Jordan, C., & Harper, S. (1997). Attitudes toward a multiple intelligences curriculum. Journal of Educational Research, 91, 115-122.
  • Naglieri, J. A. (1985). Matrix analogies test. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  • Plucker, J. A., Callahan, C. M., & Tomchin, E. M. (1996). Wherefore art thou, multiple intelligences? Alternative assessment for identifying talent in ethnically diverse and low income students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40(2), 81-92.
  • Reid, C., Romanoff, B., Algozzine, B., & Udall, A. (2000). An evaluation of alternative screening procedures. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 23, 378-396.
  • Sarouphim, K. M. (2000). Internal structure of DISCOVER: A performance-based assessment. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 23(3), 314-327.
  • Shearer, B. C. (1997). Development and validation of a multiple intelligences scale for children. Kent, OH: Multiple Intelligences Research and Consulting, Inc. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED415475)
  • Teele, S. (1992). Teele inventory of multiple intelligences. Redlands, CA: Sue Teele and Associates.
  • Teele, S. (1995). The multiple intelligences school: A place for all students to succeed. Redlands, CA: Citrograph.
  • Teele, S. (1996). Redesigning the educational system to enable all students to succeed. National Association of Secondary School Principals, NASSP Bulletin, 80, 65-75.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.